Subject: Correct The Record Wednesday September 17, 2014 Morning Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:48:02 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Wednesday September 17, 2014 Morning Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “On Fox, Latest
‘Benghazi Bombshell’ Progresses From Baseless Speculation To Absurd
Allegations”
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/16/on-fox-latest-benghazi-bombshell-progresses-fro/200772>*

“Fox News' coverage of an evidence-free ‘bombshell’ from Benghazi
hoaxster Sharyl Attkisson took just hours to morph from a reiteration of
her claim that a disgruntled former State Department employee ‘couldn't
help but wonder’ if Hillary Clinton's staff had turned over
"scrubbed" Benghazi documents to investigators into full-blown allegations
that documents had been "destroyed" -- allegations that remain baseless.”

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “Even Some At
Fox News Are Skeptical Of Attkisson's Latest Benghazi Conspiracy Theory”
<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/16/even-some-at-fox-news-are-skeptical-of-attkisso/200779>*

“Fox News' Bill O'Reilly questioned whether the latest report from
discredited investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, which baselessly
suggested a Benghazi cover-up by State Department officials, actually
constituted a ‘scandal.’”

*Raw Story: “Jon Stewart mocks Joe Scarborough’s hypocritical rant about
Hillary Clinton”
<http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/jon-stewart-mocks-joe-scarboroughs-hypocritical-rant-about-hillary-clinton/>*

“Amid all of the speculation surrounding a possible presidential run by
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Daily Show host Jon Stewart
singled out MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough for hypocritically criticizing
Clinton’s silence on the issue.”

*The Daily Beast: “Hillary Clinton Basks in Labor’s Love: ‘This Is Like a
Homecoming!’”
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/16/hillary-clinton-basks-in-labor-s-love-this-is-like-a-homecoming.html>*

“Hillary Clinton returned home to Lower Manhattan on Tuesday night, basking
in the love of organized labor at a union hall that helped launch her
political career a decade and a half ago.”

*Newsday: “Hillary Clinton recalls 'hell' of 9/11; vows to press for
Zadroga extension”
<http://www.newsday.com/news/new-york/hillary-clinton-recalls-hell-of-9-11-vows-to-press-for-zadroga-extension-1.9331121>*

“Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Tuesday night called on
Congress to extend legislation that aids rescuers and others affected by
Ground Zero toxins, as she reflected on the ‘hell’ she witnessed one day
after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.”

*Business Insider: “Immigration Activists Just Crashed Hillary Clinton's
Speech In New York”
<http://www.businessinsider.com/immigration-activists-crash-hillary-clinton-speech-2014-9>*

“Immigration activists disrupted a speech by Hillary Clinton on Tuesday evening
at an event in New York City to benefit groups advocating on behalf of
programs and legislation to support first responders and workers affected
by the September 11th attacks.”

*Wall Street Journal opinion: Jason L. Riley: “Why Hillary Was in Iowa”
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-why-hillary-was-in-iowa-1410902756>*

“The Clintons are the party's biggest fundraisers after President Obama,
which explains more than anything else why they were in Iowa on Sunday.”

*Washington Post blog: Post Politics: “Anti-Hillary Clinton PAC launches ad
campaign to coincide with Benghazi hearing”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/09/17/anti-hillary-clinton-pac-launches-ad-campaign-to-coincide-with-benghazi-hearing/>*

“Stop Hillary PAC, a organization that says it was formed to prevent
Hillary Rodham Clinton from becoming president, launched an ad campaign
Wednesday criticizing the former secretary of state as a special House
committee prepares to hold its first hearing on the deadly attacks in
Benghazi, Libya.”

*Washington Post column: Ruth Marcus: “Hillary Clinton’s steak fry
populism”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-hillary-clintons-steak-fry-populism/2014/09/16/ea1e444e-3dc3-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html>*

“Hillary 2016 would inevitably be a far different campaign than Hillary
2008.”

*USA Today opinion: Ari Rabin-Havt, co-author of The Benghazi Hoax:
“Benghazi Select Committee hearing on right path”
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/09/16/benghazi-select-committee-public-hearing-circus-column/15734395/>*

[Subtitle:] “It will be a welcome miracle if Republicans look for
constructive solutions instead of trying to score partisan points.”

*CBS: “Will politics doom the Benghazi committee's investigation?”
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-politics-doom-the-benghazi-committees-investigation/>*

“Already, though, the focus has turned away from the ARB's recommendations.”

*Politico: “Bill Clinton to stump for New Hampshire pols”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/bill-clinton-new-hampshire-campaigning-111024.html>*

“Former President Bill Clinton is expected to campaign for Democratic
candidates next month in New Hampshire.”

*BuzzFeed: “Jon Huntsman, Independent For President?”
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/jon-huntsman-independent-for-president#2wk3999>*

“Former presidential candidate Jon Huntsman has engaged in discussions with
supporters in recent months about pursuing another White House bid — this
time as an independent, according to three sources close to Huntsman.”

*Articles:*

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “On Fox, Latest
‘Benghazi Bombshell’ Progresses From Baseless Speculation To Absurd
Allegations”
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/16/on-fox-latest-benghazi-bombshell-progresses-fro/200772>*

By Olivia Kittel

September 16, 2014

*Fox News' coverage of an evidence-free "bombshell" from Benghazi
hoaxster Sharyl Attkisson took just hours to morph from a reiteration of
her claim that a disgruntled former State Department employee "couldn't
help but wonder" if Hillary Clinton's staff had turned over
"scrubbed" Benghazi documents to investigators into full-blown allegations
that documents had been "destroyed" -- allegations that remain baseless.*

*Attkisson Hypes Baseless Claim That State Department Covered Up Damaging
Benghazi Documents*

*Attkisson Highlights Speculation That State Department Staff Removed
Damaging Benghazi Documents.* On September 15, Attkisson
forwarded disgruntled former State Department employee Raymond Maxwell's
unsupported allegation that "Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an
operation to 'separate' damaging documents before they were turned over to
the Accountability Review Board (ARB) investigating security lapses
surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in
Benghazi, Libya." According to Attkisson's report, Maxwell claimed to
have observed an "after-hours" document sorting session at which a State
Department office director "close to Clinton's top advisers" told staff to
separate out Benghazi documents "that might put anybody in the Near Eastern
Affairs front office or the seventh floor in a bad light." [The Daily
Signal, *9/15/14*
<http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/>
]

*Maxwell Did Not Claim Claim Documents Were Withheld, Just That He
"Couldn't Help But Wonder" If They Were. *Attkisson's report noted that
Maxwell didn't stay to observe the full document sorting process, but
simply reviewed a separated stack of documents that "included pre-attack
telegrams and cables between the U.S. embassy in Tripoli and State
Department headquarters" and later "couldn't help but wonder" if the ARB
investigation had been skewed. From Attkisson's report:

In May 2013, when critics questioned the ARB's investigation as not
thorough enough, co-chairmen Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Adm. Mike
Mullen responded that "we had unfettered access to everyone and everything
including all the documentation we needed."

Maxwell says when he heard that statement, he couldn't help but wonder if
the ARB -- perhaps unknowingly -- had received from his bureau a scrubbed
set of documents with the most damaging material missing. [The Daily
Signal, *9/15/14*
<http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/>
]

*Rep. Cummings: Maxwell Didn't Raise Allegation During Interview With House
Oversight Committee.* Slate's Dave Weigel reported that Elijah Cummings,
the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which has extensively
investigated the attacks in Benghazi, pointed out that Maxwell did not
mention the allegation during an interview with the committee:

"Maxwell was interviewed by our committee, the Oversight and Government
Reform Committee," said Cummings. He was called by Chairman Issa as a
witness. And he never talked about this. He had plenty of opportunities to
do it. But keep in mind, we have allegations seeming to come out every
week. Mr. Schiff just talked about the three contractors, who also have
been interviewed, and suddenly they come out with these 'stand down'
allegations. But again, Mr. Maxwell did not bring those allegations to our
attention when we interviewed him extensively. Extensively." [Slate,
*9/16/14*
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/09/16/democrats_baffled_by_new_benghazi_whistleblower_s_accusations.html>
]

*Successive Fox News Reports Exaggerate Attkisson's Allegations*

*Fox News' America's Newsroom: "Some Wonder If This Could Be A Smoking Gun
Of A Potential Cover-Up." *The September 15 edition of Fox News' *America's
Newsroom* quickly highlighted Attkisson's claims, calling them a "bombshell
development, they say." Fox News correspondent Doug McKelway called the
report "powerful," but was careful to characterize the details as
"accusations." He said members of the Benghazi Select Committee "are going
to want to probe this information deeply" ahead of the first committee
hearing. Host Eric Shawn concluded the segment by noting that "some wonder
if this could be a smoking gun of a potential cover-up." Meanwhile, an
on-air graphic reiterated Attkisson's basic claim:

[Fox News, *America's Newsroom*, *9/15/14*
<http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2014/09/15/36769/fnc-an-20140915-smokinggun>
]

*Fox News' On The Record: "Clinton Allies Removed Politically Damaging
Docs." *Attkisson appeared on the September 15 edition of Fox News' *On The
Record* to discuss what host Greta Van Susteren called "stunning new
allegations in the Benghazi investigation." Van Susteren asked Attkisson
whether Maxwell knows "what was removed, what Congress didn't see, any
documents that were taken out?" Though Attkisson acknowledged that Maxwell
does not know of any documents withheld from the investigation, an on-air
graphic claimed more definitively that "Clinton Allies Removed Politically
Damaging Docs":

[Fox News, *On The Record*, *9/15/14*
<http://mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/09/16/36774/fnc-otr-20140915-benghazibombshell1>
]

*Fox News' Fox & Friends: "They're Scrubbing The Documents. Anything That
Makes Hillary Clinton Look Bad, They're Taking Out." *The September 16
edition of *Fox & Friends* took Attkisson's claims further, describing
her "explosive new revelations" as "a scandal down in D.C. that threatens
to derail Hillary Rodham Clinton." Co-host Steve Doocy summarized the
story: "State Department was told, 'put all the documents together, we're
going to send them to the review board.' He, Mr. Maxwell walks in on a
weekend, odd hours, and there, one of the people that works for him --
they're scrubbing the documents. Anything that makes Hillary Clinton look
bad, they're taking out." Appearing as a guest on the show, Attkisson noted
that references to the State Department's "seventh floor" in her report
refered to Hillary Clinton and her top advisers -- which Doocy
reinterpreted in order to claim that orders to separate damaging documents
"apparently came from the seventh floor." During the segment, an on-air
graphic said simply, "Documents Destroyed":

[Fox News, *Fox & Friends*, *9/16/14*
<http://mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/09/16/36775/fnc-ff-20140916-benghazibombshell2>
]

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “Even Some At
Fox News Are Skeptical Of Attkisson's Latest Benghazi Conspiracy Theory”
<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/16/even-some-at-fox-news-are-skeptical-of-attkisso/200779>*

By Sophia Tesfaye

September 16, 2014, 10:41 p.m. EDT

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly questioned whether the latest report from
discredited investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, which baselessly
suggested a Benghazi cover-up by State Department officials, actually
constituted a "scandal."

On the September 16 edition of his Fox News show, host Bill O'Reilly
invited Attkisson to discuss her "troubling accusations against former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton" from "a disgruntled former State
Department official." After Attkisson confirmed that her source had not
witnessed such actions himself, O'Reilly dismissed the conspiracy
explaining that "If no documents were removed, scrubbed, if they weren't
taken out or destroyed, then I don't know if there is any scandal":

[VIDEO]

Later during the segment, Fox correspondent James Rosen reported that
Attkisson's source had previously failed to disclose this accusation of a
cover-up and that his account "bears a lot of further investigation before
it can be deemed credible":

ROSEN: One point about this matter, Democrats on the House Oversight
committee, which has previously investigated Benghazi, have noted that Mr.
Maxwell was formally interviewed by that panel last year with a transcript
prepared and despite many opportunities to do so, Mr. Maxwell never
disclosed this shocking scene of obstruction of justice by high level state
department officials that he now claims to have witnessed. That omission on
his part at that time, along with other issues, will ensure that if and
when Mr. Maxwell testifies before the House Benghazi committee, he will
face some rough sledding in cross examination.

O'REILLY: Yeah. Why didn't you say it when you had the first opportunity?
Yeah, I got it.

ROSEN: Yes now, all of this is not to say that what Mr. Maxwell claims to
have witnessed never happen, just that it bears a lot of further
investigation before it can be deemed credible.

*Raw Story: “Jon Stewart mocks Joe Scarborough’s hypocritical rant about
Hillary Clinton”
<http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/jon-stewart-mocks-joe-scarboroughs-hypocritical-rant-about-hillary-clinton/>*

By Arturo Garcia

September 16, 2014

Amid all of the speculation surrounding a possible presidential run by
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Daily Show host Jon Stewart
singled out MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough for hypocritically criticizing
Clinton’s silence on the issue.

Scarborough complained on Monday that Clinton, who recently visited Iowa
for Sen. Tom Harkin’s (D-IA) “Steak Fry” event, has been “on a glorified
book tour” looking for people to ask her if she’s running so she can say
she doesn’t know, describing it as “why Americans hate politics.”

“I don’t want to see you eating steak,” Scarborough said angrily. “If
you’re gonna run, just say you’re gonna run and stop playing games.”

But Stewart showed footage of Scarborough doing much the same thing, with
his own book promotion event in New Hampshire this past March getting the
benefit of a “presidential campaign patina,” right down to the Morning Joe
host dodging a question about his own political ambitions and saying he
hadn’t ruled out running in 2016.

“If you’re gonna run, just say you’re gonna run and stop playing games,”
Stewart exclaimed, turning Scarborough’s words against him.

For his part, Stewart admitted he was interested in one potential
candidate: the squirrel who made an appearance during an ABC News interview
with Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) aired over the weekend.

“It’s just really f*cking hard to focus,” Stewart said after showing the
squirrel running behind Sanders. “Given the choice between Bernie Sanders
and squirrel! you gotta go with squirrel!”

Watch Stewart’s commentary, as posted online on Tuesday, below.

[VIDEO]

*The Daily Beast: “Hillary Clinton Basks in Labor’s Love: ‘This Is Like a
Homecoming!’”
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/16/hillary-clinton-basks-in-labor-s-love-this-is-like-a-homecoming.html>*

By David Freedlander

September 16, 2014

[Subtitle:] The 9/11 first responders’ law Clinton championed expires in
2016, and on Tuesday night, she headlined a fundraiser at a union hall to
expand it, calling labor ‘my principal ally.’

Hillary Clinton returned home to Lower Manhattan on Tuesday night, basking
in the love of organized labor at a union hall that helped launch her
political career a decade and a half ago.

“This is like a homecoming!” Clinton exclaimed at the headquarters of the
United Federation of Teachers.

The event that brought the former of secretary of state back to the city
was a fundraiser for a group pushing to expand a law that provided health
benefits for aid workers who assisted in the cleanup of the World Trade
Center after 9/11. Those attacks occurred in Clinton’s first year as a
United States senator from New York, just as she was emerging as a
political figure in her own right. She spent the next six years working to
pass a bill that would eventually become the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act, which provided $4.2 billion in for first responders to
the attacks suffering from the effects of toxic dust.

The law is set to expire in 2016, just as Clinton is likely to be in the
heat of a presidential campaign—a date advocates for the bill pushed for,
hoping that it would mean more attention to their cause.

Her appearance at UFT headquarters, according to John Feal, a demolition
supervisor at ground zero who had his foot amputated when a piece of steel
fell on him during the cleanup and who led the effort to get federal
benefits to the workers there, is a sign that Clinton, “owns this now.”

“I am going to hold her to what she says here tonight,” he said.

Mostly, though, Clinton praised the forces of organized labor that pushed
for the bill—and which would likely motor any potential presidential
campaign she may mount.

“It is absolutely imperative to recognize the key role that organized labor
played in the very beginning. It was your members, you lost janitors and
security guards and workers,” she said. “It was organized labor that came
to the forefront.”

“Organized labor was my principal ally,” Clinton added.

And labor, or New York labor at least, signaled that it would be ready for
Clinton, too, should she decide to mount another presidential campaign.

“In Mrs. Clinton, we have someone who will stand with us and will fight
with us,” said Mario Cilento, president of the New York chapter of the
AFL-CIO.

Clinton recognized several of her former constituents among the couple of
hundred people in the audience and said that as a globe-trotting secretary
of state she longed to return to New York.

On the nearly million miles worth of plane rides she took in those four
years, she said she would occasionally shut her eyes “and dream about being
home.”

Clinton’s speech was marred at its conclusion by a handful of protesters
who disrupted the proceedings to call attention to President Obama’s policy
on deportations of illegal immigrants.

Shouting, “Unafraid! Undocumented” they were quickly shuffled out. Out in
the lobby, one of the protesters explained that they staged the
demonstration to ask the secretary, “Is she going to continue the policy of
Obama and continue to deport our families? Our communities cannot wait any
longer.”

Clinton, meanwhile, spent several minutes greeting audience members along
the rope line and posing for cellphone selfies. (“This is going to be on
Instagram in 30 seconds,” said one young woman after securing her
cheek-to-cheek shot alongside the possible next president of the United
States.)

Several of the well-wishers were recognized with a “Great to see you
again!” from the former senator, and they responded meekly with a “Great to
see you, as well.”

Clinton was asked about the protesters, who at least waited until she was
finished speaking to make their case. The former secretary of state ignored
the question.

*Newsday: “Hillary Clinton recalls 'hell' of 9/11; vows to press for
Zadroga extension”
<http://www.newsday.com/news/new-york/hillary-clinton-recalls-hell-of-9-11-vows-to-press-for-zadroga-extension-1.9331121>*

By Emily Ngo

September 16, 2014, 10:09 p.m. EDT

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Tuesday night called on
Congress to extend legislation that aids rescuers and others affected by
Ground Zero toxins, as she reflected on the "hell" she witnessed one day
after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

"It was just a scene out of Dante's Inferno," said Clinton, a U.S. senator
when she visited the site 13 years ago. "It was as close to hell as I can
imagine any of us experiencing."

She described breathing toxic air and seeing billowing smoke. "All you had
to do is be there, and you knew that there were going to be consequences to
the people who had survived," she said.

Clinton spoke at a lower Manhattan fundraising benefiting 9/11 Health
Watch, which monitors aid for those who fell ill after the 2001 attacks.
She said she was among the first to demand legislative action on behalf of
9/11 first-responders and others whose health was threatened. The event was
hosted at the United Federation of Teachers headquarters, and Clinton was
introduced by AFL-CIO state president Mario Cilento.

"Organized labor was my principal ally," Clinton said. Pension funds were
the only initial means of helping those who worked on "the pile," she said.

Thousands have benefited from the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act, signed into law in 2011 to monitor and treat 9/11-related
health conditions, but thousands more still need attention, Clinton said.
She urged Congress to renew the law before it expires in two years.

"The price of passage was a so-called sunset clause, and it will come due,"
she said.

She thanked New York Democratic allies in Congress, including Sen. Charles
Schumer, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler
(D-Manhattan), but also Seaford Republican Rep. Peter King for recognizing
that Zadroga isn't a "partisan issue," but rather an "American issue."

"Last week, with the anniversary, we mourned," Clinton said. "This week, we
mobilize."

As Clinton's speech ended, six immigration activists with a group called
"United We Dream" chanted "undocumented, unafraid" and were escorted out by
security officials. One protester, Mateo Tabares, 19, of Queens, whose
family is from Colombia, told reporters Clinton opposes action by President
Barack Obama to prevent deportations.

Clinton's spokesman Tuesday night did not immediately respond to a request
for comment about the protest.

*Business Insider: “Immigration Activists Just Crashed Hillary Clinton's
Speech In New York”
<http://www.businessinsider.com/immigration-activists-crash-hillary-clinton-speech-2014-9>*

By Hunter Walker

September 16, 2014, 7:46 p.m. EDT

Immigration activists disrupted a speech by Hillary Clinton on Tuesday evening
at an event in New York City to benefit groups advocating on behalf of
programs and legislation to support first responders and workers affected
by the September 11th attacks.

After Clinton's speech, the group of at least six young activists began
chanting, "Undocumented! Unafraid!" Several of them wore t-shirts that
said: "Will You Deport My Family."

The group was escorted from the room by security. One of the activists, who
said his name was Mateo Tabares, claimed he was pushed by a guard as they
were removed from the room.

"No need to push me sir!" Tabares shouted.

"I want to tell you to leave," the guard said. "What you just did is
disrespectful."

The event was held in a room at the headquarters of the United Federation
of Teachers union in Manhattan. Outside the room, Tabares told reporters
the group of activists was there to ask Clinton why she would deport their
families. Tabares said Clinton opposed action by President Barack Obama
that would prevent some deportations.

"No more deportations!" Tabares said.

Tabares said he was 19-years-old and his family was from Colombia. He also
said the activists were affiliated with the immigration reform advocacy
group United We Dream. Tabares would not tell Business Insider exactly how
the activists gained entrance to the benefit.

"We were invited earlier today ... by a close friend of mine that I'm not
going to disclose their information," he said.

After the activists were removed, Clinton greeted admirers and took photos
with people who attended the event. She did not respond to multiple
questions from Business Insider about her reaction to the activists.

In her speech, Clinton called for an extension of the James Zadroga Act,
which was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2011 and provides
support programs and treatment for survivors and first responders affected
by the September 11th terrorist attacks. As a senator representing New
York, Clinton pushed for programs to support those affected by September
11th. She said the legislation was due to expire in two years due to a
"sunset clause" that she described as the "price of passage for the act."

 According to a press release announcing the event, it benefitted two
organizations: Citizens for the Extension of the James Zadroga Act and 9/11
Health Watch, Inc.

*Wall Street Journal opinion: Jason L. Riley: “Why Hillary Was in Iowa”
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-why-hillary-was-in-iowa-1410902756>*

By Jason L. Riley

September 16, 2014, 5:25 p.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton's weekend visit to Iowa understandably stirred more 2016
speculation, but the first order of business for the former first lady is
2014. And Mrs. Clinton and her husband were in the Hawkeye State because
the Democratic Senate candidate, Bruce Braley, is in trouble.

Mr. Braley and his Republican opponent, Jodi Ernst, are running for the
seat being vacated by retiring Democrat Tom Harkin. And according to a CNN
poll taken last week, Mr. Braley leads among likely voters by one point, 49
to 48. A congressman from Waterloo, Mr. Braley was the Democrats' first
choice to run for the seat. Republicans had trouble even fielding a
candidate, yet Ms. Ernst, a state senator with relatively low name I.D.,
has run a stellar campaign and made the race competitive. And so Democrats
find themselves worried about another Senate seat that they expected to
hold this year without too much trouble.

The Clintons are the party's biggest fundraisers after President Obama,
which explains more than anything else why they were in Iowa on Sunday.
Democrats will outraise Republicans this cycle, as they usually do. The
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised $7.7 million in August and
had $25 million on hand. The corresponding figures for the GOP were $6.1
million last month and $19.9 million on hand.

Democrats are counting on this funding advantage to save them in a year
when the president's popularity is down and Republican voter enthusiasm is
up. Monetizing Mrs. Clinton's star power is part of this strategy. The fact
that she was needed in Iowa, a state that Mr. Obama won comfortably in 2008
and 2012, is not a good sign for Democrats headed into November.

*Washington Post blog: Post Politics: “Anti-Hillary Clinton PAC launches ad
campaign to coincide with Benghazi hearing”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/09/17/anti-hillary-clinton-pac-launches-ad-campaign-to-coincide-with-benghazi-hearing/>*

By Sean Sullivan

September 17, 2014, 5:00 a.m. EDT

Stop Hillary PAC, a organization that says it was formed to prevent Hillary
Rodham Clinton from becoming president, launched an ad campaign
Wednesday criticizing
the former secretary of state as a special House committee prepares to hold
its first hearing on the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

The six-figure online and television ad campaign includes a 30-second
commercial that will run in the early nominating states of New Hampshire,
South Carolina and Iowa, the group told The Washington Post. The ad accuses
Clinton of not being forthcoming about the deadly 2012 attacks on a
diplomatic compound n Benghazi that claimed the lives of four Americans. It
encourages viewers to sign a "citizens subpoena" demanding Clinton testify
before the committee.

The "citizens subpoena" Web site asks people to provide their name, address
and e-mail address. PACs often ask for such information to help build their
e-mail lists for fundraising purposes and other communication.

The ad campaign marks Stop Hillary PAC's first TV commercial since its
formation in May 2013. It comes as the bipartisan House Benghazi Select
Committee, a panel headed up by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and created by
House Republican leaders, will hold its first open hearing Wednesday. The
panel will focus the hearing on a review board the State Department created
after the attack to examine government security abroad.

Clinton testified before House and Senate committees about Benghazi shortly
before she stepped down as the nation's chief diplomat in early 2012. But
some conservatives have continued to criticize her and raise questions
about what she knew.

Colorado state Sen. Ted Harvey, Stop Hillary PAC's honorary chairman, said
in an interview that his group intends to raise questions about various
aspects of Clinton's record moving forward.

"My number one goal is to make sure that Hillary Clinton is not the next
president of the United States," Harvey said.

*Washington Post column: Ruth Marcus: “Hillary Clinton’s steak fry
populism”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-hillary-clintons-steak-fry-populism/2014/09/16/ea1e444e-3dc3-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html>*

By Ruth Marcus

September 16, 2014, 7:51 p.m. EDT

The headline out of Hillary Clinton’s visit to Iowa was her flagrant
flirtation with the prospect of another presidential campaign. The more
interesting part was the shortest of sneak previews of the race she seems
increasingly certain to run.

“I’m ba-ack,” Clinton said at the start of her speech at Iowa Sen. Tom
Harkin’s 37th, and final, steak fry, a fundraiser that has helped launch
many a Democratic presidential candidate.

And that was just the start of the pre-campaign tease. She wasn’t sure,
Clinton confided, whether to accept Harkin’s invitation. “I’ve got a few
things on my mind these days,” she said, to knowing laughter. The “constant
grandchild watch,” for one. “And then, of course, there’s that other
thing.” The crowd erupted. Clinton smiled. “Well, it is true I am thinking
about it,” she allowed.

It showed. A steak fry peroration is far from a campaign platform. Yet
there were echoes in Clinton’s remarks not only of campaign themes past;
there were also glimmerings of the arguments to come.

Hillary 2016 would inevitably be a far different campaign than Hillary
2008. Running in the aftermath of a two-term incumbent of the opposing
party is an easier task than running in the shadow of a two-term president
in whose administration you served. The first situation calls for attack
and differentiation; the second is a subtler enterprise, demanding both
support and distancing.

Back then, Clinton could run against what she called “seven years of
incompetence, cronyism and corruption.” Now, even as she presents the
midterm elections as a choice between “the guardians of gridlock and the
champions of shared opportunity and shared prosperity,” she faces the
challenge of explaining, politely, how she would do better than President
Obama at managing congressional obstructionism.

“Change is just a word if you do not have the strength and experience to
make it happen,” Clinton noted pointedly at the Iowa Democratic Party’s
Jefferson-Jackson Day dinner in November 2007 — where she was outshone,
nonetheless, by Obama. That’s a dicier argument to make today.

To look back at Clinton’s speeches seven long years ago is to be reminded
of the ways in which the world has changed — and has not. “How do we bring
the war in Iraq to the right end?” Clinton asked then. “How can we make
sure every American has access to adequate health care? How will we ensure
our children inherit a clean environment and energy independence? How can
we reduce the deficits that threaten Social Security and Medicare?”

Good questions, even now. The first, about Iraq, has taken on poignant new
relevance, and new urgency, with the emergence of the Islamic State. The
second has begun to be answered by the Affordable Care Act, but key tests
of its implementation and effectiveness await. The third, at least when it
comes to climate change, remains dangerously unresolved. And the fourth, on
deficits and entitlement spending, now goes unasked by a Democratic Party
that has concluded that deficits don’t matter and entitlement reform is
unnecessary.

Clinton 2014, at least the Clinton 2014 of the steak fry, sounded a
decidedly populist note: “We Democrats are for raising the minimum wage,
for equal pay for equal work, for making college and technical training
affordable, for growing the economy to benefit everyone — and our opponents
are not.”

There is an understandable tendency to interpret those remarks as a nod to
Democrats’ post-financial-crisis populist leanings. Maybe — certainly
Clinton wasn’t talking deficit reduction. But it is also clear, rereading
her 2007 speeches, that these are matters of long-standing concern.

Listen to Clinton in Knoxville, Iowa, in November 2007, worrying that “our
labor market is just not working for middle-class families,” that corporate
profits are soaring while workers’ wagers remain stagnant, that “the gap
between the rich and everybody else has only gotten broader.” She wasn’t
worrying about Elizabeth Warren back then.

One striking difference between then and now is the degree to which Clinton
at the steak fry invoked issues specific to women — equal pay, access to
contraception, the implications of raising the minimum wage for female
workers. No doubt, that argument reflects Democrats’ imperative to persuade
women to turn out in November.

But I suspect it also represents a coming attraction. Seven years ago,
Clinton was skittish about gender until the end, when she proclaimed 18
million cracks in the glass ceiling. If she takes another run at the
ceiling, it is likely to be more head-on.

*USA Today opinion: Ari Rabin-Havt, co-author of The Benghazi Hoax:
“Benghazi Select Committee hearing on right path”
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/09/16/benghazi-select-committee-public-hearing-circus-column/15734395/>*

By Ari Rabin-Havt

September 16, 2014, 6:50 p.m. EDT

[Subtitle:] It will be a welcome miracle if Republicans look for
constructive solutions instead of trying to score partisan points.

On Wednesday, the Benghazi Select Committee, led by Representative Trey
Gowdy (R-SC) will hold its first public hearings since forming last spring.
The topic they will focus on, "Implementation of the Accountability Review
Board [ARB] recommendations" is exactly the type of oversight Congress
should be engaged in.

From the outset it was not illogical to believe the formation of the
Benghazi Select Committee would result in nothing more than a political
circus designed to rile up the Republican base while digging deeper down
into a conspiracy rabbit hole that has distorted public conversation about
the attack two years ago on our diplomatic facility in Libya.

Wednesday's hearing though avoids the blame games, political posturing, and
conspiracies that have been a hallmark of both Republican led
investigations into Benghazi and even Trey Gowdy's previous statements. If
anything, not enough attention has been focused on the steps taken since
September 11, 2012 to secure our diplomatic facilities.

The ARB, chaired by Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullen,
two highly regarded public servants who worked for both Democratic and
Republican administrations, was extreme critical of the State Department's
handling of the attack and laid blame on "systemic failures and leadership
and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the
State Department" stating that security at the facility was "grossly
inadequate." The ARB did not attack the president or Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton leaving many on the right, in both Congress and the media,
deeply disappointed.

So far ignored in much of the public debate have been the 29
recommendations made by the ARB to improve security at diplomatic
facilities around the world.

Trey Gowdy's first hearing is asking exactly the right question – are these
recommendations being implemented with due haste. In fact in a rare show of
bipartisanship, the hearing was held at the recommendation of one of the
committee's Democrats, Adam Schiff (D-CA).

The question for the future is will Gowdy be able to continue down this
path, focusing on areas absent from oversight? Or will he cave to his
party's worst desires to relitigate long debunked conspiracy theories --
for example the suggestion that Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton issued a
stand down order on the night of the attack.

As Representative Schiff correctly noted "I guess time will tell whether
the committee is constructive and whether our participation on it helps it
be productive, or whether it degenerates into a circus."

*CBS: “Will politics doom the Benghazi committee's investigation?”
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-politics-doom-the-benghazi-committees-investigation/>*

By Stephanie Condon

September 17, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EDT

The Republicans in the House who spearheaded the formation of a special
Select Committee on Benghazi have insisted that their investigations into
the Sept. 11, 2012 attack won't be politically motivated. Democrats joined
the committee with the aim of keeping politics out of the effort. Still,
ahead of the committee's first public hearing, neither Democrats nor
Republicans have seemed capable of defusing one of the most
politically-charged issues in Washington.

In a show of bipartisanship, Wednesday's hearing is slated to take a more
forward-looking approach. Rather than focusing on who's to blame for the
attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya that left four Americans dead, the
committee will examine the implementation of recommendations for improved
diplomatic security that were offered up by the Accountability Review Board
(ARB), the independent body that investigated the attack.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, the chairman of the committee, "is
leading a fair, fact-based and impartial investigation," Benghazi committee
spokesman Jamal Ware said in a statement.

"Chairman Gowdy sincerely hopes that all sides will not prejudge the
outcome of the investigation--before even the Committee's first hearing,
which is on a topic suggested by the Democrats--and instead allow a
constructive and thorough investigatory process that produces a final
report on Benghazi that is beyond any doubt," Ware said.

When asked Tuesday whether he is concerned the committee is inherently
political, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, the committee's top Democrat,
declined to answer directly.

"Mr. Gowdy has told me politics will not be involved in this, but of course
we have our concerns," he said. He cited a few issues that concern
Democrats, such as the rules concerning the committee's transparency.
Still, Cummings said, "We want to make sure we zero in on several things --
the things we'll be talking about tomorrow, that is making sure our men and
women in diplomatic posts around the world are safe."

Already, though, the focus has turned away from the ARB's recommendations.

Anticipating a politicized hearing, the House Democrats on the committee on
Tuesday rolled out a web page called "Benghazi on the Record" that aims to
convince people that virtually every question about the Benghazi attack has
been answered. It includes an "asked and answered" database with questions
that have already been addressed, as well as a 133-page collection of
public documents that answer the questions in greater detail.

"Many Americans do not realize how much work has already been done
investigating the Benghazi attacks," Cummings said, noting that the ARB and
seven different congressional committees have already issued nine different
Benghazi reports.

Ware said that Gowdy is "willing to risk answering the same question twice
rather than risk it not be answered at all."

Ware pointed out that Congress has yet to receive every document it has
requested related to the attack, "it is fair to say that not all questions
have been asked and answered."

Lawmakers may have a whole new line of questioning from a report published
this week by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson on the Daily Signal, a
blog funded by the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation.

Attkisson interviewed former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell,
who was one of four State Department officials disciplined in the wake of
the Benghazi attack. Maxwell returned to the State Department after being
placed on administrative leave, though he retired last year.

Maxwell told Attkisson that a group of Clinton allies in the State
Department sifted through Benghazi-related documents before handing them
over to the ARB. He suggested they were attempting to sift out any
documents that could have been damaging to then-Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton.

"The ARB inquiry was, at best, a shoddily executed attempt at damage
control, both in Foggy Bottom and on Capitol Hill," Maxwell said.

Marie Harf, deputy spokeswoman for the State Department, defended the ARB on
Tuesday, insisting it had "full and unfettered access and direct access to
State Department employees and documents."

The ARB co-chairs, former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, had "complete authority to
reach out independently and directly to people," Harf continued. "Employees
had complete authority to reach out directly to the ARB. And they've said
themselves they had unfettered access."

She added, "I have no idea what prompted this somewhat interesting
accounting of what someone thinks they may have seen or is now saying they
saw. But the ARB has been clear. The ARB's co-chairs have been clear that
they had unfettered access."

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, a member of the House Oversight Committee,
suggested on Fox News on Monday that Maxwell told him the same story a year
ago, when congressional investigators interviewed the former State
Department employee.

However, the Benghazi report that the House Oversight Committee produced
last year doesn't mention anything about Maxwell's allegations. Cummings,
the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said Tuesday, "Mr. Maxwell did
not bring that to our attention when we interviewed him extensively."

Should Wednesday's hearing become too heated, a pair of Democrat-aligned
firms are readying the website BenghaziCommittee.com, described as a rapid
response project to fact-check and respond to the Select Committee on
Benghazi hearings.

If lawmakers are interested in keeping Wednesday's discussion nonpartisan,
there's still plenty to discuss. Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the
Brookings Institution, told CBS News that Congress could avoid the typical
"Benghazi foodfights" by focusing on the overall dilemma of the United
States' policy in Libya.

"The president himself recently acknowledged that he's been very
disappointed in where the country has gone over three years," O'Hanlon
said. "So there's no partisanship in observing that the broad policy has
failed, and that we need improvements in everything from embassy security
to rapid response forces to how we try to help the Libyans build a new
state."

Libya this year has been plagued by some of the worst violence it's seen
since dictator Muammar Qaddafi was ousted in 2011. American personnel
evacuated the country in July, and a group allied with Islamist militias
recently stood guard over the deserted U.S. embassy in Tripoli.

The committee on Wednesday will hear from Greg Starr, assistant secretary
for diplomatic security for the State Department; Mark Sullivan, chairman
of the Independent Panel on Best Practices and former U.S. Secret Service
director; and Todd Keil a member of the Independent Panel on Best Practices
and a former Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary.

*Politico: “Bill Clinton to stump for New Hampshire pols”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/bill-clinton-new-hampshire-campaigning-111024.html>*

By Katie Glueck

September 16, 2014, 5:58 p.m. EDT

Former President Bill Clinton is expected to campaign for Democratic
candidates next month in New Hampshire.

WMUR.com reported on Tuesday that Clinton will be in the Granite State,
home to the first presidential primary, on Oct. 16for a Jefferson Jackson
dinner. A spokesman for the former president subsequently confirmed the
report.

Clinton’s wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would be the
likely Democratic front-runner if she decides to make a second run for
president in 2016.

Bill Clinton is expected to stump for Democrats on the ballot, a list that
includes Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, Reps. Carol Shea-Porter and Ann McLane
Kuster, and Gov. Maggie Hassan, the report noted.

*BuzzFeed: “Jon Huntsman, Independent For President?”
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/jon-huntsman-independent-for-president#2wk3999>*

By Ruby Cramer and  McKay Coppins

September 16, 2014, 9:05 p.m. EDT

[Subtitle:] The former Utah governor has engaged with supporters and donors
in a discussion about another White House bid in 2016.

Former presidential candidate Jon Huntsman has engaged in discussions with
supporters in recent months about pursuing another White House bid — this
time as an independent, according to three sources close to Huntsman.

The former Utah governor declined to comment for the record. His daughter,
MSNBC co-host Abby Huntsman Livingston, who was a surrogate for Huntsman’s
campaign in 2012, said in an email that her father is “primarily focused on
family and private-sector endeavors.”

She added: “He has no plans to run, but in politics never say never. I know
there is a lot of pull out there for him to do something as an independent.”

The sources said Huntsman has talked with supporters and donors about an
independent candidacy, and that he appeared open to the idea.

Other friends and former aides, however, suggested that the 2016
conversations were primarily a function of Huntsman’s willingness to hear
out his supporters — not his interest in the race. Fundraising would be a
massive obstacle, one his campaign struggled with mightily in 2012. And
securing a place on a nationwide ballot is difficult — and expensive — for
any independent candidate.

“People are way out over their skis,” said Steven Bogden, the policy
director for Huntsman’s political action committee, Red Rock PAC, which was
founded last May to help test the waters for a national run but has since
gone dormant.

“Just because Huntsman loves Captain Beefheart doesn’t mean he’s taking
psychedelics,” Bogden said.

Huntsman told the Deseret News earlier this month that he was a “strong no”
on a 2016 presidential bid.

Huntsman dropped out of the Republican primary in January 2012, after a
third-place finish in New Hampshire, where he based his headquarters. About
a month later, appearing on MSNBC, he called for the rise of a “third-party
movement.”

“Someone’s going to step up at some point and say we’ve had enough of
this,” he said.

Before he quit the race, Huntsman considered going independent twice, once
in the summer and again in the fall of 2011, according to a senior member
of his campaign staff. Huntsman considered taking advantage of the
infrastructure set up by Americans Elect, a nonprofit group that hoped to
elect a third-party candidate, but his campaign ultimately dismissed the
idea as unrealistic.

Those deliberations were detailed in part in the book, Double Down: Game
Change 2012, which outlines a call from Huntsman to his campaign manager
after a September debate in Tampa, Fla. “I want to go independent,”
Huntsman reportedly said. “I think we should do it sooner rather than
later.”

Since the election, Huntsman has co-chaired a coalition of Democrats,
Republicans, and independents called “No Labels.” He also serves as
chairman of the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank. The 54-year-old
former governor was most recently the U.S. ambassador to China during
President Obama’s first term.

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  September 18 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton participates in a CAP
roundtable (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-center-for-american-progress-110874.html>
)

·  September 19 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the DNC with
Pres. Obama (CNN
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/27/politics/obama-clinton-dnc/index.html>)

·  September 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton attends CGI kickoff  (The
Hollywood Reporter
<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clintons-honor-leonardo-dicaprios-environmental-731964>
)

·  September 22 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton at CGI (CGI
<http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/public/2014/pdf/agenda.pdf>)

·  September 23 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton at CGI (CGI
<http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/public/2014/pdf/agenda.pdf>)

·  September 23 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines the Goldman Sachs
10,000 Women CGI Dinner (Twitter
<https://twitter.com/danmericaCNN/status/510157741957316609>)

·  September 29 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines fundraiser for DCCC
for NY and NJ candidates (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-new-york-fundraiser-110902.html?hp=r4>
)

·  September 29 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines another fundraiser
for DCCC (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-headline-dccc-fundraiser-110764.html?hp=l8_b1>
)

·  October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network
Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network
<http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>)

·  October 6 – Ottawa, Canada: Sec. Clinton speaks at Canada 2020 event (Ottawa
Citizen
<http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-speaking-in-ottawa-oct-6>
)

·  October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation
Annual Dinner (UNLV
<http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>)

·  October 14 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes
salesforce.com Dreamforce
conference (salesforce.com
<http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/highlights.jsp#tuesday>)

·  October 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for House
Democratic women candidates with Nancy Pelosi (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-nancy-pelosi-110387.html?hp=r7>
)

 ·  December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)