Subject: Correct The Record Thursday July 24, 2014 Morning Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:34:22 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

**

*Correct The Record Thursday July 24, 2014 Morning Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Clinton’s ‘Hard Choices’ Slips
Behind ‘Blood Feud’ in Book Battle”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/07/23/clintons-hard-choices-slips-behind-blood-feud-in-book-battle/>*

"The Warren and Geithner figures illustrate how few people are buying new
political books. Neither has sold as many books in total as Mrs. Clinton
moved in the first week “Hard Choices” was on sale."

*CNN: “Clinton, Sotomayor and Castro to attend Friday event together”
<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/23/clinton-sotomayor-and-castro-to-attend-friday-event-togethe/>*

“Hillary Clinton, Sonia Sotomayor and Julian Castro will appear together in
New York City on Friday as part of Dream Big Day at the Bronx Children's
Museum.”

*CBS (San Francisco): “Hillary Clinton Announces Kids’ Education Campaign
At UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland”
<http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/07/23/hillary-clinton-announces-kids-education-campaign-at-ucsf-benioff-childrens-hospital-oakland-talking-is-teaching-too-small-to-fail/>*

“Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stopped by an Oakland hospital
Wednesday morning to help announce a new campaign to educate low-income
children from birth, organizers said.”

*EdSource: “Clinton launches Talk, Read, Sing campaign”
<http://edsource.org/2014/clinton-launches-talk-read-sing-campaign/65713#.U9DmVPldV8E>*

“Hillary Clinton spoke to a friendly crowd at Oakland’s Benioff Children’s
Hospital on Wednesday about her new campaign (no, not that one) to get
parents to spend more time talking, singing and reading to their young
children.”

*Media Matters for America: “Fox News Pushes ‘Mistress’ Gossip With
Anti-Clinton Author Interviews”
<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/07/23/fox-news-pushes-mistress-gossip-with-anti-clint/200186>*

“Fox News is using anonymously-sourced claims from anti-Clinton authors to
inject the rumor that Bill Clinton has a mistress into the media, claims
which the network has apparently made no effort to confirm.”

*Quinnipiac University: “Obama In Slump, But Clinton Scores In Florida,
Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Rubio Narrows GOP Gap As Jeb Bush Sags”
<http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/florida/release-detail?ReleaseID=2063>*

“‘Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may be taking some criticism
recently in the news media and among some liberal Democratic precincts, but
nothing has changed among average voters in Florida where she remains queen
of the political prom,’ said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the
Quinnipiac University Poll.”

*Time: “How Hillary and Bill Clinton Raised $1.4 Billion” [w/ INTERACTIVE
CHART]
<http://time.com/3026492/how-hillary-and-bill-clinton-raised-1-4-billion/>*

[Subtitle] “Together, the Clintons have become two of the most impressive
fundraisers in American history. Use the interactive graphic to see the
many ways their supporters' money has been collected over the years.”

*Forbes: “Hillary Clinton Wants Millennials To Know She's Running For
President”
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/francesbridges/2014/07/16/celebrity-substance-taylor-swift/>*

“Clinton wants millennials to be the first to get excited about her
candidacy, because the demographic wins elections.”

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Is Courting Congress the Stuff
of Movies? Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Think So”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/07/24/is-courting-congress-the-stuff-of-movies-hillary-clinton-doesnt-think-so/>*

“One who seems to disagree is a fellow Democrat and Obama administration
alumnus who could become the 45th president: Hillary Clinton. What she says
is that presidents can never give up coaxing lawmakers from the other side,
citing her husband’s efforts as an example.”

*National Journal: “What's the Point of the Draft Elizabeth Warren
Movement?”
<http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-s-the-point-of-the-draft-elizabeth-warren-movement-20140724>*

“Why is Ready for Warren, the new group launched with much fanfare to
persuade Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts to run for president, even
necessary, when Warren already has a well-financed political operation
under her direct control?”

*MSNBC: “Joe Biden makes his pitch to black voters”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/joe-biden-makes-his-pitch-black-voters>*

“Overshadowed by Hillary Clinton at almost every turn, Vice President Joe
Biden appears to be trying to create a path to relevancy in the early
positioning for 2016 Democratic presidential primary that runs through
black voters.”

*Articles:*

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Clinton’s ‘Hard Choices’ Slips
Behind ‘Blood Feud’ in Book Battle”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/07/23/clintons-hard-choices-slips-behind-blood-feud-in-book-battle/>*

By Reid J. Epstein

July 23, 2014, 4:19 p.m. EDT

Six weeks after it began, Hillary Clinton’s “Hard Choices” tour rolls on,
stopping this week in California for discussions hosted by Facebook and
Twitter. But the book is hardly selling like gangbusters – and it’s been
outsold for three weeks in a row by Ed Klein’s “Blood Feud: The Clintons v.
the Obamas.”

Mr. Klein remains one place ahead of Mrs. Clinton on the New York Times
hardcover nonfiction bestseller list and 85 spots up on Amazon’s sales
rankings.

Mrs. Clinton’s sales numbers have dropped dramatically each week it has
been on sale. From a first-week total of 86,000 copies sold, “Hard Choices”
moved only 10,000 copies in the week ending last Sunday, according to
Nielsen BookScan, which tracks book sales for 85% of the U.S. print market.

At the same time, Mr. Klein’s sales have held steady. He sold 17,000 copies
the first week his book was available, 20,000 each of the next two weeks
and 17,000 in the week ending Sunday.

Mrs. Clinton’s defenders are already touchy about her book sales number.
Correct the Record, which formed last year to defend Mrs. Clinton against
Republican attacks, earlier this month sent reporters a 12-point memo
detailing the book’s successes. It noted her first-week sales topped Sarah
Palin’s 2010 book “America By Heart.”

And to be sure, Mrs. Clinton has still sold more than twice as many copies
of “Hard Choices” than Mr. Klein has of his book. He’s not likely to catch
up.

Both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Klein have new competition starting this week.
Daniel Halper’s new book, “Clinton Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding
Rebuilding of a Political Machine,” is rated above both of them on Amazon’s
bestseller list as of Wednesday afternoon.

Mr. Halper’s book charts in at No. 23 on the Amazon list. Mr. Klein’s book
is No. 39. Mrs. Clinton’s is at No. 124.

*Warren vs. Geithner*

The Clinton-Klein matchup isn’t the only book battle worth watching this
summer. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and then-Treasury Secretary
Timothy Geithner were  internal enemies in the first-term Obama
administration. Both released memoirs within two weeks of each other this
spring.

Overall Ms. Warren’s sales of “A Fighting Chance” have outpaced Mr.
Geithner’s of “Stress Test” by 29,000 copies, according to Nielsen, but
neither has sold much since the first three weeks their books were
available. Mr. Geithner hasn’t sold 1,000 books in a week for a month. Ms.
Warren sold only 300 books the week ending June 29.

The Warren and Geithner figures illustrate how few people are buying new
political books. Neither has sold as many books in total as Mrs. Clinton
moved in the first week “Hard Choices” was on sale.

*CNN: “Clinton, Sotomayor and Castro to attend Friday event together”
<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/23/clinton-sotomayor-and-castro-to-attend-friday-event-togethe/>*

By Dan Merica

July 23, 2014, 3:36 p.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton, Sonia Sotomayor and Julian Castro will appear together in
New York City on Friday as part of Dream Big Day at the Bronx Children's
Museum.

Earlier this summer, Sotomayor surprised the former secretary of state
during a book signing Clinton held at a Costco in Northern Virginia. The
Supreme Court justice and Clinton shared a few words and held each others
hand while they chatted.

Castro, who served three terms as mayor of San Antonio, Texas, was recently
confirmed as the secretary of housing and urban development. He is widely
considered a rising star in the Democratic Party and some even say a
potential vice presidential candidate in 2016 – the same year polling shows
Clinton as the overwhelming frontrunner for the party's presidential
nomination.

Dream Big is a summer academic program run through the museum that uses art
to inspire 120 second and third graders from a number of different Bronx
neighborhoods.

Sotomayor, who was raised in the Bronx and jokingly says she prefers to be
referred to as “Sonia from the Bronx,” has been involved since the start of
the program five years ago and invited Clinton and Castro to attend
Friday's final
presentation, according to Carla Precht executive director of the Bronx
Children's Museum.

“She has been at our Dream Big event every year for five years,” Precht
said. “For the kids, this is their dream big celebration day.”

During the event, Precht said that students will display what they had
learned and perform for Sotomayor, Clinton and the other dignitaries.
Precht said that Sotomayor and Clinton would deliver short remarks that
will be geared towards the children.

*CBS (San Francisco): “Hillary Clinton Announces Kids’ Education Campaign
At UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland”
<http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/07/23/hillary-clinton-announces-kids-education-campaign-at-ucsf-benioff-childrens-hospital-oakland-talking-is-teaching-too-small-to-fail/>*

[No Writer Mentioned]

July 23, 2014, 12:29 p.m.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stopped by an Oakland hospital
Wednesday morning to help announce a new campaign to educate low-income
children from birth, organizers said.

The “Talking is Teaching: Talk, Read, Sing” campaign kicked off at UCSF
Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland Wednesdaymorning with Clinton and
representatives of the Bay Area Council, Children’s Hospital and Kaiser
Permanente.

The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is supporting the
campaign, intended to close the “word gap,” an apparent difference of 30
million more words that children from high-income families hear before they
are four years old compared to low-income families, officials from the Too
Small to Fail initiative said.

Too Small to Fail created the Talking is Teaching program with the help of
a $3.5 million donation from Marc Benioff, a technology CEO and
philanthropist, and his wife Lynne.

The campaign includes messages in Children’s Hospital’s lobby, waiting
rooms and exam rooms reminding parents to talk, read and sing to their
children.

The hospital will also distribute literature like a Talking is Teaching
toolkit produced by Sesame Street and a Text4Baby mobile service for
pregnant mothers that will remind them about early brain development.

They will also distribute items from a new clothing line for babies and
toddlers developed by the company Oaklandish.

A broader campaign will include radio and TV advertisements, billboards and
bus shelter ads.

Kaiser Permanente will also distribute materials to all new parents of
children born at its Oakland hospital and all children during well-baby
visits.

Too Small to Fail said a survey conducted of low-income parents,
grandparents and caregivers of low-income children in Oakland indicated 43
percent of them told a story to their child daily, 49 percent sang to their
child daily, and 42 percent played a non-electronic game and 52 percent
read a book each day.

Talking, singing and reading to very young children can have a huge impact
on their developing minds, which will reach 80 percent of their capacity by
the time they are three years old, according to the organization.

*EdSource: “Clinton launches Talk, Read, Sing campaign”
<http://edsource.org/2014/clinton-launches-talk-read-sing-campaign/65713#.U9DmVPldV8E>*

By Lillian Mongeau

July 23, 2014

Hillary Clinton spoke to a friendly crowd at Oakland’s Benioff Children’s
Hospital on Wednesday about her new campaign (no, not that one) to get
parents to spend more time talking, singing and reading to their young
children.

“Brain research is showing us how important the first years of life are,”
Clinton said, “and how much a simple activity can help build brains.”

Oakland will be the second city – the first was Tulsa, Oklahoma – to
receive a concentrated dose of messaging about the importance of verbally
engaging infants and toddlers. As part of the “Talking is Teaching: Talk
Read Sing” campaign, residents can expect a multimedia campaign featuring
television commercials, a radio spot, billboards and bus station ads. Local
retailer Oaklandish will also be launching a new clothing line for babies
that includes onesies that read, “Let’s talk about hands and feet,” and
baby blankets proclaiming, “Let’s talk about bedtime.” For every item
purchased, Oaklandish will donate one item to a family in need.

A targeted campaign to reach new parents will launch at the Benioff
Children’s Hospital and through Kaiser Permanante. Benioff and Kaiser
Permanente will distribute the onesies and other materials informing
parents about the importance of talking to their children regularly. New
parents will also have the opportunity to sign up for a free mobile health
service called Text4baby that will send them prompts and information about
how to enhance their child’s vocabulary development. The children’s
hospital campaign is set to last for three years and will be funded largely
by a $3.5 million gift from Lynne and Marc Benioff. The Kaiser campaign is
working with the Clinton Global Initiative to provide materials.

Studies have found a gap of 30 million words between the vocabularies of
4-year-old children growing up in low-income homes and those growing up in
homes headed by professional, college-educated parents. Clinton pointed out
that though gaps are found among families with different income levels,
that doesn’t have to be true. Talking and singing to children is free and
something all parents can engage in, she said.

However, research has found that many parents from  lower-income
backgrounds doubt their ability to help their children do well in school,
which could lead to lower engagement among parents. Starting school with
fewer words sets kids at an immediate disadvantage that can continue
throughout their public school careers, according to researchers.

“The word gap leads to the achievement gap,” Clinton said. “We want parents
and caregivers to feel that starting today, they can help (their children).”

A host of local agencies, including the Bay Area Council and Next
Generation, a nonprofit focused on early childhood education and climate
change, will be involved in supporting the new campaign. The Oakland
campaign is part of a larger initiative called Too Small to Fail, which is
spearheaded by Clinton and funded by The Clinton Foundation.

*Media Matters for America: “Fox News Pushes ‘Mistress’ Gossip With
Anti-Clinton Author Interviews”
<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/07/23/fox-news-pushes-mistress-gossip-with-anti-clint/200186>*

By Matt Gertz

July 23, 2014, 2:44 p.m. EDT

Fox News is using anonymously-sourced claims from anti-Clinton authors to
inject the rumor that Bill Clinton has a mistress into the media, claims
which the network has apparently made no effort to confirm.

Weekly Standard online editor Daniel Halper pushed the rumor in his new
book, Clinton Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine based
solely on anonymous sources, who he claimed told him the former president
was engaging in "reckless" behavior with a mistress. On July 21, The New
York Post gossip section Page Six reported that conservative author Ronald
Kessler will make similar claims in his forthcoming The First Family
Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of The Presidents,
apparently also based on anonymous sources.

While the rest of the media has largely ignored the anonymously-sourced
gossip, Fox has been using interviews with Halper to promote these claims.
Fox apparently has not attempted to confirm the gossip before promoting it
on the network's airwaves.

Fox host Megyn Kelly asked Halper about Kessler's report -- which she noted
was "unconfirmed" -- during a July 21 interview promoting Halper's book:

KELLY: On the mistress front there was a report from Breitbart -- it's
actually from a new Ron Kessler book -- saying that Bill Clinton allegedly
had some affair partner who they call the energizer bunny with whom he is
still seeing, unconfirmed. You know, these ladies, whatever. Did you
interview any of these?

HALPER: I interviewed some. And I can tell you aides told me that they had
to advise Bill Clinton in the 2008 election not to bring his mistress on
the campaign trail. So he is still engaging in reckless behavior.

As Media Matters has noted, Kelly's reputation allows her to provide a
"veneer of legitimacy" that other Fox hosts cannot offer.

Fox & Friends co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck also asked Halper during a July
22 interview how the "talk that there is still a mistress in play here"
could affect a potential Hillary Clinton presidential run:

HASSELBECK: There has been some talk that there is still a mistress in play
here. If that were to be the case, how would that affect Hillary's run in
2016?

HALPER: I'm sure it is and I'm sure there are more stories and more
scandals to emerge. I try to cover as many -- you know, you have to make --
when you cover the Clintons, you have to make hard choices about which
scandals and which mistresses to cover. So I have made mine in the book.

Fox and the right-wing media have been largely alone in promoting Halper's
book. In fact, the Weekly Standard writer complains in a July 22 Politico
Magazine piece that his reporting has been "all but ignored by the
mainstream media" and attributes this to media fears of retribution from
the Clintons. That conspiracy drew mockery from reporters, with BuzzFeed's
Ben Smith tweeting, "Oh stop complaining and break some news" and The
Hill's Niall Stanage commenting that the Politico piece was likely a
"calculated part of his book's promotion."

It's no wonder that Halper is being met with derision outside of the
right-wing bubble. His book is a combination of old news and questionable
anecdotes from sources speaking anonymously "out of fear of retribution or
attack from ruthless Clinton aides," according to the author.

For example, Halper promotes a confusing, poorly-sourced, anonymous account
to accuse former President Clinton of attempting to rape an unnamed woman
in the 1970s. The claim from a "friend" of the woman, who apparently
related the story to advisers to Monica Lewinsky in the 1990s, who later
passed the story to Halper, who published it without attempting to verify
any part of it. In another instance, Halper baselessly posits that
Clinton's serious December 2012 injury may have been the result of hitting
her head after falling down drunk. Invoking a "rumor" from "bloggers and
websites" that Clinton drinks heavily, Halper points to "one well-known
Clinton hater" for the claim the injury was the result of drinking --
again, citing no names.

Similarly, reviewers of Kessler's previous books have criticized the former
chief Washington correspondent for the right-wing website Newsmax for
peddling trashy gossip. His writing has been described as
"speculation-filled," relying on "gossip, innuendo and secondary sources,"
and "filled with ... Page Six tidbits" (the last coming from his own
publisher). Kessler has accused Hillary Clinton of "pathological lying" and
pushed the conspiracy theory that she drove Vince Foster to suicide.

*Quinnipiac University: “Obama In Slump, But Clinton Scores In Florida,
Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Rubio Narrows GOP Gap As Jeb Bush Sags”
<http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/florida/release-detail?ReleaseID=2063>*

[No Writer Mentioned]

July 24, 2014

Even though President Barack Obama remains stuck in a swamp in Florida,
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dominates the 2016 presidential
landscape, sweeping the Democratic field and topping former Gov. Jeb Bush
and other possible Republican contenders by margins of 7 to 21 percentage
points, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.

Gov. Bush gets 21 percent in a Republican presidential primary in Florida,
followed by Sen. Marco Rubio with 18 percent, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas
with 10 percent, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky with 8 percent, former
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee with 7 percent and New Jersey Gov. Christopher
Christie with 6 percent. No other candidate tops 5 percent and 13 percent
of Republicans remain undecided.

This compares with results of a May 1 survey by the independent Quinnipiac
(KWIN-uh- pe-ack) University, showing Bush leading the Republican pack with
27 percent, followed by Paul with 14 percent and Rubio with 11 percent.

Secretary Clinton takes 67 percent of Democratic presidential primary
voters, compared to 64 percent May 1, followed by Vice President Joseph
Biden and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts with 8 percent each.
Another 11 percent are undecided.

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may be taking some criticism
recently in the news media and among some liberal Democratic precincts, but
nothing has changed among average voters in Florida where she remains queen
of the political prom," said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the
Quinnipiac University Poll.

"Two-thirds of Democrats say she is their candidate for 2016 and none of
the others even makes it into double digits. Sunshine Staters are on top
when Florida Republicans are asked their top 2016 choice, but former Gov.
Jeb Bush slips a little and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio just about caught up with
him."

Florida voters back Clinton over Bush 49 - 42 percent in the 2016 White
House race. The Democrat tops other Republicans by wider margins:

53 - 39 percent over Rubio;

53 - 37 percent over Paul;

54 - 33 percent over Christie;

51 - 38 percent over U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.

Independent voters back Clinton over Bush by a narrow 45 - 41 percent.
Against other Republicans, her lead among independent voters is 16 to 20
percentage points.

Clinton's lead among women runs from 56 - 36 percent over Bush to 61 - 28
percent over Christie.

Florida voters give Clinton a 58 - 38 percent favorability rating, compared
to 48 - 37 percent for Bush, 43 - 35 percent for Rubio, 32 - 28 percent for
Paul, 35 - 36 percent for Christie and 33 - 30 percent for Ryan.

"Secretary Clinton leads the Republicans against whom she is matched by
double digits with the exception of former Gov. Bush who trails her by 7
points," Brown said. "Inside the Beltway they may be talking about Mrs.
Clinton's potential weaknesses should she run in 2016. But at this point in
Florida, the nation's largest presidential swing state, her assets
overwhelm any vulnerabilities." President Obama's Approval

Florida voters give President Obama a negative 44 - 52 percent job approval
rating, compared to a negative 46 - 50 percent May 1. Negative ratings are
7 - 92 percent among Republicans and 40 - 54 percent among independent
voters, while Democrats approve 84 - 13 percent. Men give a negative 38 -
59 percent rating, compared to women's slightly positive 49 - 46 percent.

Voters approve 49 - 37 percent of the job Rubio is doing and give U.S. Sen.
Bill Nelson a 45 - 32 percent score.

From July 17 - 21, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,251 registered voters
with a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percentage points. The survey includes
451 Republicans and 457 Democrats, each with a margin of error of +/- 4.6
percentage points.

*Time: “How Hillary and Bill Clinton Raised $1.4 Billion” [w/ INTERACTIVE
CHART]
<http://time.com/3026492/how-hillary-and-bill-clinton-raised-1-4-billion/>*

By Alexander Ho, Pratheek Rebala, and Michael Scherer

July 24, 2014, 6:30 a.m. EDT

[Subtitle] Together, the Clintons have become two of the most impressive
fundraisers in American history. Use the interactive graphic to see the
many ways their supporters' money has been collected over the years.

There are great American political fundraisers. And then there are Hillary
and Bill Clinton, the first couple of American political fundraising. Few
in American history have collected and benefited from so much money in so
many ways over such a long period of time. Since they arrived on the
national political scene 32 years ago, the Clintons have attracted at least
$1.4 billion in contributions, according to a review of public records by
TIME and the Center for Responsive Politics.

That sum helps illustrate Hillary Clinton’s enormous advantage should she
decide to run for President in 2016. Much of the money, raised through two
Senate and three Presidential campaigns, was gathered together in small
checks by an extensive network of donors and fundraisers. Other donations
came in the form of six-figure “soft money” donations from wealthy
individuals during Bill Clinton’s presidency. A third category includes
money the couple has raised for the Clinton Foundation, the family’s global
non-profit, through speaking engagements for Bill Clinton, and through
outside political spending that benefitted the Clinton efforts.

The records also show a select group of top donors who have given in
multiple ways to the Clintons over the years. Many of these same donors,
including people like S. Daniel Abraham, founder of diet supplement company
Slim Fast, and Susie Tompkins Buell, founding of the clothing company
Espirit, have formed personal friendships with the Clintons, even as they
have continued to pursue public policy campaigns around issues like U.S.
relations with Israel and the Keystone XL pipeline.

Through the years, the Clintons have adjusted over time to the changing
rules that govern political contributions. Craig Smith, a longtime adviser
to the Clintons who is now helping to organize the Ready for Hillary PAC,
estimates that a Hillary 2016 candidacy could cost as much as $1.7 billion,
including the money raised and spent on her behalf by outside groups. That
would make the effort about 150% more expensive than the 2012 Obama effort,
an increase in line with historical norms.

The data for this analysis is drawn from three broad categories.

Campaign contributions: Direct giving to Hillary and Bill Clinton’s
campaigns for the Senate and the Presidency going back to 1992, as reported
to the Federal Election Commission. It includes both individual
contributions and money from other PACs given to either the leadership
committees or joint fundraising committees of the Clintons. These figures
also include “soft money” contributions to the Democratic National
Committee during Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign and his presidency. Those
donations were later eliminated by the 2002 campaign finance reform law.

Non-political contributions: Speaking fees collected by Bill Clinton up to
2008, and contributions to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton
Foundation. Figures for Bill Clinton’s speaking fees are based on filings
from Hillary Clinton’s tenure in the Senate. The foundation has only
released a list of donors grouped by the contribution ranges, so in all
cases the interactive assumes that each donor gave the smallest amount
possible in that category. The range of contribution, from all foundation
donors, as reported by the foundation, could go as high as $1.3 billion.

Outside spending: Independent expenditures on behalf of the Clintons, as
well as contributions to Ready for Hillary PAC, an independent super PAC
created to support Clinton in 2016, which she has told friends she grateful
to have organized on her behalf.

*Forbes: “Hillary Clinton Wants Millennials To Know She's Running For
President”
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/francesbridges/2014/07/16/celebrity-substance-taylor-swift/>*

By Frances Bridges

July 23, 2014, 7:44 p.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton is making the media rounds promoting her book, “Hard
Choices,” with interviews on ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX and NPR, where she has
discussed topics ranging from Benghazi to Monica Lewinsky. But the question
everyone wants the answer to: is Clinton running for president?

In her interviews with Diane Sawyer on ABC and Jane Pauley on CBS, Clinton
ambled around the question, saying, “I have a lot to think about” and with
her first grandchild coming in the fall, she wants to “give herself time,”
to enjoy life as it comes and make a decision at the end of the year. She
told Pauley she has not made a pros and cons list yet for running.

Of course she has made no declarations, but her most recent interview on
“The Daily Show” is her most suggestive.

Stewart was prepared with a career aptitude test, “This can you help you
decide if you even want this job”:

Do you want to work outside the home, or do you prefer a home office? “I
kind of prefer a home office.”

Do you have a favorite shape of that home office? Do you want it to have
corners? Or do you not want it to have corners? “The world is such a
complicated place, the fewer corners the better.”

“So it sounds like, if I may,” Mr. Stewart said, “that you’ve declared
already.” Cue cheers from the audience.

Unlike other interviews, Clinton did nothing to deter speculation that she
is preparing to run, if not already running for president in 2016.

Stewart asked about the constant media scrutiny, and in particular the “We
were dead broke” comment Clinton made about their financial circumstances
after the presidency. She conceded that it was an “in artful use of words,”
then segwayed into income inequality, and her concern for young people and
the lack of opportunity.

Stewart quipped, “You know what was kind of awesome, and what says to me
that you’re running for president? How easily you went from that to income
inequality in America.”

Clinton laughed, then continued, “Six million young people between 16 and
24  are neither in school nor at work, they have given up,  I think people
don’t feel it. I think we have to change our economic and our political
system so that we can make it a reality again. I think that’s the big
business ahead of us.”

It seems odd that Clinton’s most newsworthy interview would be with a fake
news program, but “The Daily Show” leads in the coveted 18-49 age
demographic, easily beating late night competitors “The Tonight Show,” “The
Late Show With David Letterman” and second place Comedy Central cohort,
“The Colbert Report.”

In the last two elections, analysts found that millennials (ages 18 through
33) were a significant factor in President Obama’s election in 2008 and
reelection in 2012. One could argue that Obama beat Clinton for the
nomination in 2008 because his campaign targeted young people, a
demographic politicians normally do not address because of low voter turn
out. In the 2012 election, millennials made up 19% of voters.

Clinton’s suggestive “Daily Show” interview was no accident, she gave a
wink and a nod to one of the most important election demographics, saying
that their concerns are her concerns, and that addressing those struggles
is, “the big business ahead of us.”

Clinton wants millennials to be the first to get excited about her
candidacy, because the demographic wins elections. Without making a
declaration, Clinton found a way to tell young people, “I’m running for
president.”

Now the question is, will she get the millennial vote? Let me know your
predictions in the comments.

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Is Courting Congress the Stuff
of Movies? Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Think So”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/07/24/is-courting-congress-the-stuff-of-movies-hillary-clinton-doesnt-think-so/>*

By Peter Nicholas

July 24, 2014, 6:44 a.m. EDT

One of the legacies of Barack Obama‘s presidency is a certain indifference
to the messy, time-sucking work of courting Congress. Mr. Obama knows he
needs allies on Capitol Hill. Yet there’s a limit to the personal
investment he’ll make persuading lawmakers to get behind the bills he wants
passed.

One golf outing with GOP House Speaker John Boehner. OK. A second one?
We’re still waiting for that to happen.

It seems a truism that time spent getting to know one’s adversaries pays
off in politics – a people business if there ever was one. But the White
House isn’t so convinced that’s the case. A popular view in White House
circles is that the Republican opposition in Congress is so off-the-charts
obstructionist that no amount of personal charm or persuasion coming from
the Democratic president would change much of anything. So, if that’s the
case, why not play golf with your pals?

One who seems to disagree is a fellow Democrat and Obama administration
alumnus who could become the 45th president: Hillary Clinton. What she says
is that presidents can never give up coaxing lawmakers from the other side,
citing her husband’s efforts as an example. The late 1990s were a pretty
partisan time. The GOP-controlled House impeached Bill Clinton, after all.
And yet … “Bill never stopped reaching out to them,” she said last month in
Colorado.

One former White House aide doesn’t buy Mrs. Clinton’s argument. He says
the Clinton White House failed to pass a health-care overhaul in the early
1990s – something Mr. Obama achieved in his first term with Democratic
majorities in both houses.

“That’s fine for her to say. And they had experience trying to work with
them [Republicans] and going through impeachment and not getting health
care done.

“I look at (Mr. Obama’s) record and he wrung every bit of legislative
achievement out that was possible – when he was in an environment to do it.
He hasn’t given up. But he’s in an impossible situation …”

Presidential races often hinge on big, marquee issues: taxes and spending;
war and peace. Those will be front-and-center in 2016. But Mrs. Clinton is
signaling that if she does run, she may offer as a selling point her
willingness to persevere with Congress in ways Mr. Obama was reluctant to
do.

She invokes the Steven Spielberg movie “Lincoln” as an example of how a
president must embrace the sausage-making aspect of the job to achieve
worthy goals: In Lincoln’s case, passage of the 13th Amendment.

“If you’re going to get something done, you have to persuade …” she said at
the Colorado event.

“Lincoln” ended happily, with Mr. Lincoln’s arm-twisting culminating in the
passage of the amendment ending slavery.

Could anything like that happen these days? The former White House aide
offers up Camp David as an example. What would happen if Mr. Obama packed
Mr. Boehner and all the other GOP leaders in a helicopter and flew them to
Camp David for a marathon bargaining session aimed at resolving differences
over immigration, health care and job creation?

It’s the stuff of movies, isn’t it? Maybe not.

“That would likely be the worst thing for the Republican leadership in the
House and Senate with their caucus,”  the former aide said.  ”If they came
out with an agreement, a lot of their caucus would be suspicious that they
had gotten snookered and charmed by the president.

“So I know that it would make for a good movie, but it doesn’t get
legislation.”

*National Journal: “What's the Point of the Draft Elizabeth Warren
Movement?”
<http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-s-the-point-of-the-draft-elizabeth-warren-movement-20140724>*

By Scott Bland

July 24, 2014

[Subtitle:] The liberal favorite is already building a booming political
machine, while the brand-new Ready for Warren group starts from
scratch—without her approval.

The reason Ready for Hillary exists, and the reason numerous people who are
connected to Hillary Clinton have endorsed it, is simple: The super PAC is
building a sellable list of supporters of the former secretary of State,
who doesn't have a formal political operation to do preliminary work for a
2016 presidential campaign.

That raises the question: Why is Ready for Warren, the new group launched
with much fanfare to persuade Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts to run
for president, even necessary, when Warren already has a well-financed
political operation under her direct control?

Draft groups have been around as long as politics, but the ones popping up
in the super PAC era have the ability to raise big bucks while
appropriating their favored candidates' name. (Asked about the group named
after her, Warren told ABC, "I do not support this.") And while it will
take time to judge Ready for Warren's efforts, draft groups are not
guaranteed to help the candidates they support, even as they often help the
strategists and vendors working for them.

"Our main goal is to show her she has the support and there's a lot of
momentum around it," Ready for Warren campaign manager Erica Sagrans said.
"People do want her to run … we feel our job is to capture that and
organize it."

The thing is, Warren herself already has the tools to capture and organize
supporters. Nearly 1 million people follow her on Facebook. Warren has an
active website where people can sign up for email updates or donate money,
even though she isn't up for reelection. And the money—each donation from a
supporter whose name and other data are meticulously tracked—continues to
flood in: The Warren campaign raised about $300,000 in the second quarter
of 2014, while her leadership PAC, another fundraising tool, had its best
quarter ever, bringing in $600,000.

Put together, Warren's committees raised more than a touted Democratic
Senate candidate (West Virginia's Natalie Tennant) running this year, a
testament to the excitement Warren provokes among the Democratic grassroots.

Ready for Warren would channel resources elsewhere, which Sagrans says is
necessary at this point. "Our goal is to push her to run," Sagrans said.
"Giving money to her is not explicit about" that goal.

What Ready for Warren and other draft groups can do is openly talk about a
presidential run and get people thinking about it while Warren herself
repeats, "I am not running for president" endlessly.

"Her political machinery is not urging herself to run for president,"
Sagrans continued. "… We're more explicit about her running for president
as opposed to just fortifying or building her base. We want to do that, but
we want to do it in a way that talks about her as a potential candidate."

The fact is, though, the initial beneficiaries of a draft group are not
candidates; they're the people the draft group is paying. If Hillary
Clinton runs for president, her campaign will likely be able to buy or
lease the supporter list generated by Ready for Hillary's millions in
spending for a fraction of the production cost. But if Clinton doesn't, the
$8 million-plus that Ready for Hillary has already raised—using Clinton's
name and the hopes associated with it—will simply have gone to the group's
vendors and staff.

The National Draft Ben Carson for President Committee, which seeks to
persuade the conservative physician to run in 2016, has directed about 90
percent of its spending back into fundraising for itself. That means a lot
of the money raised by several direct-mail firms working for the PAC goes
right back to them, to send more mail. The group has raised $7.2 million
since last summer.

Whatever the costs of the Carson PAC's buildup efforts, campaign director
Vernon Robinson says it's all going toward a valuable resource: a
mobilized, itemized organization of Carson followers that the doctor, who
doesn't have his own political committee, doesn't have. "Building the
organization, collecting petitions, and also building our house list:
that's the three objectives," Robinson said. "Direct mail, online
fundraising, major-donor fundraising achieves those objectives. So if
you're achieving your three objectives, you're doing what you're supposed
to be doing."

"If this was a scam," Robinson continued, "I'd be in Southern Texas or
Southern Florida or Southern California in January, not Iowa." Robinson
spent 37 days in the Hawkeye State drumming up support for Carson in
December and January.

*MSNBC: “Joe Biden makes his pitch to black voters”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/joe-biden-makes-his-pitch-black-voters>*

By Alex Seitz-Wald

July 23, 2014, 5:43 p.m. EDT

Overshadowed by Hillary Clinton at almost every turn, Vice President Joe
Biden appears to be trying to create a path to relevancy in the early
positioning for 2016 Democratic presidential primary that runs through
black voters.

Biden riled up the crowd Wednesday at the NAACP convention in Las Vegas,
promoting his deep ties to “the community” and his long support for civil
rights. He’s scheduled to speak Thursday at The National Urban League’s
meeting in Ohio.

Biden has also been re-establishing connections with Democrats in South
Carolina, an early primary state where the large African-American community
can sway the Democratic vote. Even after joining the White House, Biden has
made regular visits to the Palmetto State, headlining state party
fundraisers, giving commencement addresses and even vacationing.

“Many of us believe he’s a very viable candidate, and especially in South
Carolina,” said Dick Harpootlian, the former state Democratic Party
chairman, who played golf with the vice president on his most recent visit.
Biden has maintained connections with African-American activists and
leaders in the state, Harpootlian told msnbc, and knows many of them
personally.

At the NAACP conference, Biden opened his remarks by crediting the civil
rights organization with his first electoral victory to the Senate in 1972.

“I got elected because of the NAACP,” he said, adding, “they didn’t check
my credentials at the door, so I’ll tell you them to you now: I am a
lifelong member of the NAACP.”

Biden went on to explain his long history of supporting civil rights, going
all the way back to his upbringing in Delaware, when he said he was “the
only Caucasian boy on the East side of Wilmington for a long time.”

“Look folks, where I come from, in Delaware, everything is about the
neighborhood,” he added, name-checking various leaders in the room with
whom he has worked.

“One of the first people to take me under his wing was Louis Redding,”
Biden said, referring to the first African-American admitted to the bar in
Delaware, who would go on to argue major civil rights cases, including
Brown v. Board of Education.

Biden went on to lay out the long sweep of history on voting rights, saying
that after decades of increasing bipartisan support for expanding the
franchise since the Voting Rights Act of 1965, progress has recently
reversed itself.

“I thought we had finally won, I really did. It’s what got me involved in
the first place, and I thought finally,” he said, pounding his fist on the
podium for emphasis. “But those days appear to be over. This is not your
father’s Republican Party. We are in a hailstorm of new attempts by states
and localities to limit ballot access.”

Biden has been one of the administration’s more vocal surrogates to the
African-American community and on the issue of voting rights. That got him
in trouble during the 2012 presidential campaign, when he told a black
audience that Republicans wanted to unshackle Wall Street and “put y’all
back in chains.”

While much has been made of Clinton’s vulnerability on the ideological
left, political scientist Tom Schaller and Slate columnist Jamelle Bouie
have pointed out that losing the black vote by a huge margin in 2008 may
have been more consequential for Clinton than losing liberals.

More than anywhere else, this potential vulnerability could play out in
South Carolina, where Clinton barely campaigned in 2008, expecting to lose
badly. Clinton will likely be very strong in New Hampshire, given both her
and her husband’s history in the Granite State. But she could be weaker in
Iowa and South Carolina, perhaps enticing someone like Biden into the race.

Last year, Biden headlined the South Carolina Democratic Party’s annual
fundraising dinner, bringing in more money than any dinner in the previous
15 years, said Harpootlian, who famously sparred with Bill Clinton in 2008.

But the Clintons themselves have deep ties in the African-American
community, which they’ve worked to repair since Hillary Clinton’s last run.
Even President Obama joked during the White House Correspondents Dinner
that Clinton had the nomination all but sewn up, brewing resentment in
Biden.

Despite all that, Biden has repeatedly dropped hints about 2016, and he has
said publicly that he’s considering a run. He told ABC’s “The View” that
he’s “uniquely qualified” to be president and drew a subtle contrast with
Clinton by highlighting his modest wealth.

“I don’t take a back seat to anyone when it comes to fighting some of the
toughest progressive battles the country has seen,” Biden told liberal
activists last week at the Netroots Nation conference in Detroit. He also
spoke last week at Generation Progress, a conference of young progressives
in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Center for American Progress.

“How old would you be if you didn’t know how old you were?” the 71-year-old
Biden rhetorically asked the NAACP crowd, paraphrasing the late baseball
great Satchel Paige. “Folks, I’m 42 years old, and I’m ready to go.”

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  ~ July 23-27 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Ameriprise
Financial Conference (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/george-w-bush-hillary-clinton-substitute-speaker-109010.html>
)

·  July 24 – NPR’s On Point: Sec. Clinton is interviewed by NPR’s John
Harwood (Twitter
<https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/492091268906754048>)

·  July 25 – New York City, NY: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Bronx Children’s
Museum Dream Big Day (CNN
<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/23/clinton-sotomayor-and-castro-to-attend-friday-event-togethe/>
)

·  July 29 – Saratoga Springs, NY: Sec. Clinton makes “Hard Choices” book
tour stop at Northshire Bookstore (Glens Falls Post-Star
<http://poststar.com/news/local/clinton-to-sign-books-in-spa-city/article_a89caca2-0b57-11e4-95a6-0019bb2963f4.html>
)

·  August 9 – Water Mill, NY: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the Clinton
Foundation at the home of George and Joan Hornig (WSJ
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/06/17/for-50000-best-dinner-seats-with-the-clintons-in-the-hamptons/>
)

·  August 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes Nexenta’s OpenSDx
Summit (BusinessWire
<http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140702005709/en/Secretary-State-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-Deliver-Keynote#.U7QoafldV8E>
)

·  September 4 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton speaks at the National Clean
Energy Summit (Solar Novis Today
<http://www.solarnovus.com/hillary-rodham-clinto-to-deliver-keynote-at-national-clean-energy-summit-7-0_N7646.html>
)

·  October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network
Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network
<http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>)

·  October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation
Annual Dinner (UNLV
<http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>)

·  ~ October 13-16 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes
salesforce.com Dreamforce
conference (salesforce.com
<http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/keynotes.jsp>)

 ·  December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)