Subject: Correct The Record Thursday September 11, 2014 Afternoon Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:59:38 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Thursday September 11, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:*

*Tweets:*

*Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: #ICYMI
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/ICYMI?src=hash>: Our new record analysis looks
at @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton>'s record on College
Affordability:
http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-on-college-affordability/ …
<http://t.co/QCTO8fGW1t> [9/10/14, 4:42 p.m. EDT
<https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/509804013865279488>]

*Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: HRC called for an investigation into
the enforcement of equal pay laws by the Bush Administration #equalpay
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/equalpay?src=hash>
http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-a-fighter-for-equal-pay/ …
<http://t.co/M5vlyxVEvX> [9/10/14, 4:21 p.m. EDT
<https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/509798786810384384>]

*Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton
<https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> has consistently advocated for
paycheck fairness. #equalpay <https://twitter.com/hashtag/equalpay?src=hash>
 http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-a-fighter-for-equal-pay/ …
<http://t.co/M5vlyxVEvX> [9/10/14, 2:59 p.m. EDT
<https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/509778141619822592>]

*Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: Hillary Clinton and Equal Pay
http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-a-fighter-for-equal-pay/ …
<http://t.co/VtaG1GaxB0> #EqualPay
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/EqualPay?src=hash> pic.twitter.com/GWRKe4ppmI
<http://t.co/GWRKe4ppmI>[9/10/14, 2:52 p.m. EDT
<https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/509776421259341824>]

*Headlines:*

*Associated Press: “Clintons Organizing 10th Annual Global Meeting”
<http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_GLOBAL_INITIATIVE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>*

“President Barack Obama will address the four-day conference in New York
City. It begins Sept. 21 with an awards ceremony hosted by television host
Seth Meyers.”

*The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Clintons to honor Leonardo DiCaprio”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/217396-clintons-to-kick-off-annual-meeting-with-star-studded-awards>*

“The Clinton Global Initiative will launch their annual meeting this month
with an awards ceremony honoring actor Leonardo DiCaprio for his
environmental work and featuring comedian Seth Meyers.”

*The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Carney: Clinton 'likely to embrace' Obama
foreign policy”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/217417-carney-clinton-likely-to-embrace-obama-foreign-policy>*

“Hillary Clinton is ‘likely to embrace’ President Obama's record on foreign
policy as a presidential candidate because she helped create and execute
it, former press secretary Jay Carney said Wednesday.”

*Weekly Standard blog: The Blog: “Bernie Sanders Challenges Hillary”
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bernie-sanders-challenges-hillary_804761.html>*

“It would be good for Mrs. Clinton, and the nation, if she should be pushed
into actually working for the nomination, rather than having it bestowed
upon her like a crown.”

*Associated Press: “Democratic National Committee visits Phoenix”
<http://azdailysun.com/news/state-and-regional/democratic-national-committee-looking-at-phoenix/article_61d4aa4e-f8dd-5121-88dc-950c60d12caa.html>*

"Phoenix is the final city that the committee is visiting and is one of
five finalists to host the event. Hosting duties would mean a huge boost to
the local economy. The 2008 Democratic National Convention brought in more
than $260 million to Denver, Stanton said."

*Washington Post blog: The Fix: “American politics haven’t been the same
since Sept. 11, 2001. Here’s why.”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/09/11/american-politics-havent-been-the-same-since-sept-11-2001-heres-why/>*

“That debate [about world affairs] will be at the center of not only the
2016 Republican primary -- where several of Paul's rivals have blasted his
views -- but also the general election fight against presumed Democratic
nominee Hillary Clinton who spent four years as President Obama's top
diplomat.”

*Articles:*

*Associated Press: “Clintons Organizing 10th Annual Global Meeting”
<http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_GLOBAL_INITIATIVE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>*

By Ken Thomas

September 11, 2014, 12:33 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Bill and Hillary Clinton are bringing together heads of
state, business leaders and actors Leonardo DiCaprio and Matt Damon for
their annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting.

President Barack Obama will address the four-day conference in New York
City. It begins Sept. 21 with an awards ceremony hosted by television host
Seth Meyers.

The former president and ex-secretary of state will address the meeting
along with daughter Chelsea Clinton, the foundation's vice chair.

Those expected to attend the 10th annual meeting include King Abdullah II
and Queen Rania of Jordan, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet
(bah-cheh-LET'), Cisco CEO John Chambers, General Motors CEO Mary Barra and
Cherie Blair, wife of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

*The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Clintons to honor Leonardo DiCaprio”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/217396-clintons-to-kick-off-annual-meeting-with-star-studded-awards>*

By Peter Sullivan

September 11, 2014, 9:59 a.m. EDT

The Clinton Global Initiative will launch their annual meeting this month
with an awards ceremony honoring actor Leonardo DiCaprio for his
environmental work and featuring comedian Seth Meyers.

The 8th annual Clinton Global Citizen Awards ceremony will take place in
New York City on Sept. 21 and feature musical performances from Aloe Blacc,
Natalie Merchant and Jason Mraz, the Clinton Global Initiative announced on
Wednesday.

It will be a star-studded opening to a conference that Former President
Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and their daughter Chelsea have built up into
a forum for discussing ideas on climate change, education and women's
rights.

Republicans have long criticized the Clintons, and Democrats in general, as
being too close to Hollywood, but the former first family have never shied
from their entertainment industry ties.

“Hollywood, likewise, relies on collaboration to bring creative visions to
life and has been an excellent partner to the foundation across a number of
our efforts,” Chelsea Clinton told The Hollywood Reporter, which
exclusively reported details of the awards show on Wednesday.

"My family is grateful that some of the most talented, caring and engaged
artists in entertainment will help us shine a light on this year’s Clinton
Global Citizen Award honorees and their extraordinary commitments and work
to strengthen communities around the world," she added.

With Hillary Clinton weighing a 2016 presidential bid, the support of
Hollywood could provide her with a fundraising advantage.

President Obama will also be speaking at the annual meeting, placing his
relationship with Hillary Clinton under scrutiny. Obama has praised his
former secretary of State, but Clinton has, in recent weeks, attempted to
distance herself from some of the president’s policies.

Other speakers include Mary Barra, the CEO of General Motors, who has had
to deal with controversy over deaths linked to a faulty ignition switch in
GM cars. Actor Matt Damon, co-founder of water.org, will also be speaking.

DiCaprio is being honored for launching the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation,
an environmental organization.

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, actress Eva Longoria and
former American Idol judge Randy Jackson, who will serve as music director,
will also attend the opening awards ceremony.

*The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Carney: Clinton 'likely to embrace' Obama
foreign policy”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/217417-carney-clinton-likely-to-embrace-obama-foreign-policy>*

By Justin Sink

September 11, 2014, 11:21 a.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton is "likely to embrace" President Obama's record on foreign
policy as a presidential candidate because she helped create and execute
it, former press secretary Jay Carney said Wednesday.

"She was secretary of state for President Obama for four years and she
understands that record will be part of what she runs on," Carney, hired
Wednesday as a contributor to CNN, told the network. "Her time as secretary
of state is something she should be proud of, and the president's record on
foreign policy is something she is more likely to embrace than anything
because she was a big part of it."

Earlier this summer, Clinton suggested in an interview with the Atlantic
that Obama’s restrained approach to the civil war in Syria had created a
vacuum that enabled the rise the Islamic State terror group.

She also criticized the president's frequently cited foreign policy mantra
of "don't do stupid stuff," saying the motto was not “an organizing
principle” worthy of “great nations.”

Although a spokesman for the former New York senator said the comments were
not intended as an attack, and Clinton said subsequently she was proud to
have served with Obama, those close to the favorite for the 2016 Democratic
nomination sought again this week to draw a distinction between their
foreign policy leadership style.

“You never want to be a Monday morning quarterback on these issues because
who knows how things would ultimately turn out, but Obama has been passive
on these issues,” one former Clinton aide told The Hill. “She would have
taken a more aggressive approach.”

Carney told CNN that Clinton "will figure out if she decides to run" how to
balance embracing and distancing herself from the president.

The former White House spokesman described Obama as "certainly close to
former Secretary Clinton and to President Clinton."

*Weekly Standard blog: The Blog: “Bernie Sanders Challenges Hillary”
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bernie-sanders-challenges-hillary_804761.html>*

By Geoffrey Norman

September 11, 2014, 12:22 p.m. EDT

Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont has been making coy about running for
President.  He will be visiting Iowa this weekend and yesterday, as CNN
reports, he established some distance between himself and Hillary Clinton,
the nominee in waiting.

“‘If we do not get our act together to come up with public policy which
expands the middle class, if we don't overturn Citizens United, if we don't
move to public funding of elections, we are going to live in an oligarchic
form of society,’ Sanders said. ‘Now is Hillary Clinton going to say that?’”

Mrs. Clinton has the money, the name recognition, the support of the media,
and everything, it seems, except a willingness or ability to say or write
(even with the help of ghost writers) anything interesting or original.  If
she runs – and she has promised to let us know by the end of the year –
then it will be a long and unedifying campaign.

Mrs. Clinton can be challenged from within her own party.  And should be.
The Sanders dare points up her vulnerability on the matters of income
inequality, her friendly relations with Wall Street, and her personal
status and style as a member of the one-percent and the elite of the
political class.  And, then, there is her record as secretary of state in
an administration whose foreign policy is in tatters. She has already
attempted to put some daylight between herself and the president but there
is only so much she can accomplish in this regard without alienating people
she will need.

It would be good for Mrs. Clinton, and the nation, if she should be pushed
into actually working for the nomination, rather than having it bestowed
upon her like a crown.

*Associated Press: “Democratic National Committee visits Phoenix”
<http://azdailysun.com/news/state-and-regional/democratic-national-committee-looking-at-phoenix/article_61d4aa4e-f8dd-5121-88dc-950c60d12caa.html>*

By Terry Tang

September 10, 2014

Friction between the Obama administration and Arizona Republican lawmakers
won't influence whether Phoenix gets picked as the site of the party's 2016
national convention, a top Democratic National Committee official said
Wednesday.

"The DNC's been to red states, blue states. We're just looking for a city
that can accommodate the requirements of a convention," DNC Chief Executive
Officer Amy Dacey said during a news conference alongside Phoenix Mayor
Greg Stanton.

Stanton said Phoenix has grown more diverse and reflective of the rest of
the country, citing its growing Latino population.

"Pretty soon, we'll be hearing around the country that 'So goes Arizona, so
goes our nation,'" Stanton said.

He also credited Gov. Jan Brewer, who famously shook her finger at
President Barack Obama during a visit to Phoenix, for writing a letter in
support of the city's bid to host the convention.

Besides the voter landscape, Stanton touted expansions Phoenix has made in
the last decade with its light rail transit system and a sky train
connecting the rail to the airport.

Phoenix is the final city that the committee is visiting and is one of five
finalists to host the event. Hosting duties would mean a huge boost to the
local economy. The 2008 Democratic National Convention brought in more than
$260 million to Denver, Stanton said.

The other cities being considered are New York, Philadelphia, Birmingham,
Alabama, and Columbus, Ohio.

The 15-member DNC group will be in Phoenix until Thursday and will look at
the US Airways Center, Chase Field and the Phoenix Convention Center — all
in the downtown area.

They also will meet with members of the Phoenix 2016 Host Committee, city
staff and business leaders as well as nonprofit and labor leaders to
discuss the bid.

Bill Clinton was the last Democrat to carry Arizona in a presidential
election in 1996 but before that, Democrats had lost every presidential
race in that state since Harry Truman in 1948.

Joe Uscinski, a political science professor at the University of Miami, has
studied how national party convention locations have affected presidential
political campaigns back to 2000. Uscinski said he doubts choosing Phoenix
will drastically push Arizona to be a bluer or even purple state.

"I don't' see them getting a bunch of Republicans in Arizona getting swayed
by the Democratic Party," Uscinski said. "All these people who supported
SB1070 or all the Jan Brewer legislation, I don't see them being like 'The
Democrats are here. I'm going to vote for whomever — Hillary Clinton or
something.'"

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz is expected to announce the host city
later this year or in early 2015.

Republicans have chosen Cleveland as the site for their 2016 national
convention.

*Washington Post blog: The Fix: “American politics haven’t been the same
since Sept. 11, 2001. Here’s why.”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/09/11/american-politics-havent-been-the-same-since-sept-11-2001-heres-why/>*

By Chris Cillizza

September 11, 2014, 12:14 p.m. EDT

 Thirteen years ago today, two planes struck the World Trade Center towers.
One smashed into the Pentagon. A fourth crashed in Pennsylvania.  While
it's a cliche to suggest that everything changed that day, it's clear that
American politics -- the art (and science) of understanding and channeling
public opinion into legislation and leadership -- has been radically
altered over the intervening years.

In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, there was a a
rally-around-the-flag effect the likes of which hadn't been seen in post
World War II America. President George W. Bush, who had struggled to move
beyond his narrow and protracted victory over Al Gore in the 2000 election,
became a massively popular figure overnight.

That chart above in many ways tracks with how the public dealt with the
attacks of Sept. 11.  After the initial burst of patriotism came the long
reckoning with what it meant that terrorists could reach us in our biggest
cities and how, whether and how much the federal government should or could
do about it. But, that broader conversation didn't happen immediately.

The 2002 election was dominated by tough talk -- and tough attacks --
about how politicians should react to the emergent terrorist threat. The ad
that, for better or worse, typified where we were as a country was this one
run by then Rep. Saxby Chambliss (R) against Georgia Sen. Max Cleland (D).

Democrats cried foul, insisting that the ad questioned the patriotism of a
man who had lost three limbs while fighting in Vietnam.  Chambliss won.

The following presidential election was, again, almost entirely dominated
by what happened on Sept. 11, 2001 -- and how to keep it from happening
again. Bush's approval ratings were sliding -- largely due to creeping
doubts about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- but the message that he
had kept the country safe since Sept. 11 was a powerful emotional appeal.
This ad, entitled "Safer, Stronger", drove home that message.

Bush won.

By the middle of the last decade, however, the country had begun to examine
the costs -- economic and psychic -- of our post-Sept. 11 approach.
Suddenly, Bush's appeals to the country's common patriotism began to ring
hollow for more and more people, and Democrats began to speak out more
forcefully on national security  matters -- including their concerns about
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Worth noting: The plummet in Bush's
approval ratings was due, yes, in part to the lack of weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq but moreso due to his handling of Hurricane Katrina,
which hit the Gulf Coast in August 2005.)

The 2006 midterms were a pivot point in the debate over what Sept. 11 meant
-- and how we should react. The round rejection of Bush and his party
signaled the doubts among large swaths of the American public as to whether
what had happened earlier in the decade was the right reaction -- or an
overreaction -- to the attacks of September 2001.  (The rethinking included
questions about the Patriot Act, which had been passed in 2001 and
reauthorized in the summer of 2005.)

Those doubts coalesced in the candidacy of then Illinois Sen. Barack Obama,
who had come to national attention when he publicly opposed the war in Iraq
-- he described it as a "dumb war" in a speech in 2002.  Obama, more so
than anyone else in the Democratic or Republican race understood that
American sentiment about how the country had reacted to Sept. 11, 2001 had
changed in the seven years since the attacks had happened.  (Former New
York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, whose entire presidential campaign was
premised on his role helping rebuild after the attacks didn't win a single
delegate.) Obama was attacked -- first in the primary by Hillary Clinton in
the famous/infamous "3 am" ad then in the general election by John McCain
-- as insufficiently experienced or committed to keeping the country safe.
It didn't work.  He won easily.

Think of those seven years as action and reaction. The country moved
strongly in one direction between 2001 and 2004 and then snapped back
strongly in the other direction between 2005 and 2008. The last six years
have been less predictable than the seven that came before them; fears
remain (as evidenced by the strong support for air strikes against ISIL)
but they are leavened by serious doubts about the institutions that we once
held dear -- from government to the church to the media.

Gallup, which regularly polls how much faith people have in institutions,
has found that  many have reached -- or approached -- all-time lows in
trust of late. Of the 17 institutions Gallup tested back in June, only
three -- the military, the police and small business -- win a majority of
peoples' trust.

That eroding trust in, well, everything, has become the defining political
reality of our time. (It's tied closely to a growing pessimism in the
public and a sense that, no, things won't always just keep getting better
for future generations.) As we have written previously, that lack of trust
-- combined with a lingering-if-back-of-the-mind unease about just how safe
we are -- has led to a sense of a country adrift, unmoored from the
realities that once governed the country and our lives, but without a new
set of principles on which to grab hold.

President Obama addressed that unease in a speech -- oddly enough -- at a
fundraiser in Seattle in late July. He said (bolding is mine):

“But whether people see what’s happening in Ukraine, and Russia’s
aggression towards its neighbors in the manner in which it’s financing and
arming separatists; to what’s happened in Syria -- the devastation that
Assad has wrought on his own people; to the failure in Iraq for Sunni and
Shia and Kurd to compromise -- although we’re trying to see if we can put
together a government that actually can function; to ongoing terrorist
threats; to what’s happening in Israel and Gaza -- part of peoples' concern
is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and
we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s
based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common
humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people.”

The rise of libertarianism -- and Rand Paul -- is a direct reaction to the
rising distrust and doubt about who we can trust and what it really means
to be an American in 2014. Paul's push for a complete overhaul of American
foreign policy toward one far more skeptical about foreign entanglements
has found considerable support from a country deeply skeptical that America
can or should play world cop. (Four in ten Americans said in a recent
NBC-Wall Street Journal poll that the U.S. should be "less active" in
world affairs as compared to 27 percent who said the country should be more
active.) That debate will be at the center of not only the 2016 Republican
primary -- where several of Paul's rivals have blasted his views -- but
also the general election fight against presumed Democratic nominee Hillary
Clinton who spent four years as President Obama's top diplomat.

That means that 15 years on from the horrific attacks of Sept. 11, 2001,
that day -- and what it meant -- will continue to be at the forefront of
the national conversation between politicians and the people they hope to
represent. The truth is that politicians, like the rest of us, continue to
grapple with how 9/11 changed us -- in ways good and bad.  That process is
ongoing.