Subject: Correct The Record Thursday September 11, 2014 Morning Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:12:58 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Thursday September 11, 2014 Morning Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*CNN: “Bernie Sanders challenges Hillary Clinton: ‘Is [she] going to say
that?’”
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/10/politics/clinton-sanders-2016/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_latest+(RSS%3A+Most+Recent)>*

"Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton communications group, took issue with
the idea that Clinton didn't address the issues Sanders had been
addressing. "Senator Sanders has a good point -- the American people always
want a campaign that includes a spirited dialogue about the issues," said
Adrienne Elrod, the group's communications director. "But Hillary has spent
her entire life turning talk into action, putting policies in place to make
lives better for all Americans.""

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “How The Right
Wing Media Is Using Chuck Todd's Interview To Dismiss Hillary Clinton
Support”
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/10/how-the-right-wing-media-is-using-chuck-todds-i/200727>*

“Right wing media have latched onto comments made by new Meet the Press
host Chuck Todd, in which he suggested that Hillary Clinton would not be a
frontrunner in 2016 if not for her gender, dismissing Clinton's support as
merely ‘enthusiasm to break the glass ceiling.’”

*Des Moines Register opinion: Kathie Obradovich: “There's nothing moderate
about Bernie Sanders”
<http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/kathie-obradovich/2014/09/11/bernie-sanders-nothing-moderate/15431047/>*

“If Sanders decides to run, he'll first have to help voters understand
exactly what's under the label. Otherwise, he'll fall flatter than
yesterday's can of New Coke.”

*Des Moines Register: “Clintons, Harkin to share stage at final steak fry”
<http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2014/09/11/tom-harkin-final-steak-fry-bill-hillary-clinton-indianola/15431763/>*

“More than 150 national and international reporters have requested
credentials, organizers said. The cable public affairs channel C-SPAN will
broadcast the event live.”

*Politico: “Benghazi panel to hear from security experts”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/benghazi-panel-security-experts-110819.html>*

“House lawmakers investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi will
hear next week from three experts on State Department recommendations
designed to increase security at U.S. consulates.”

*The Hollywood Reporter: “Clintons to Honor Leonardo DiCaprio's
Environmental Activism (Exclusive)”
<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clintons-honor-leonardo-dicaprios-environmental-731964>*

“The Clinton Global Initiative will mark its 10th anniversary with a
star-studded Manhattan gala and internationalized awards ceremony Sept. 21,
honoring, among others, Leonardo DiCaprio for his environmental activism
and the former president of Kosovo, Atifete Jahjaga, for peacemaking.”

*Huffington Post: “Wendy Davis Wants Hillary Clinton For President In 2016”
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/10/wendy-davis-hillary-clinton-2016_n_5798558.html>*

“Wendy Davis is in the middle of her campaign to become the governor of
Texas, and she's hoping she won't be the only woman assuming executive
office in the near future.”

*CNN: “Carney: Obama would give more speeches if networks would let him”
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/10/politics/carney-interview/index.html?hpt=po_c1>*

“She [Sec. Clinton] was Secretary of State for President Obama for four
years and she understands that that record that will be part of what she
runs on. Her time as Secretary of State is something she should be proud
of, and the president's record on foreign policy is something she is more
likely to embrace than anything because she was a big part of it.”

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Rand Paul Sounds Cautious
Notes After Obama’s ISIS Speech”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/10/rand-paul-sounds-cautious-notes-after-obamas-isis-speech/>*

“The nuanced remarks by Mr. Paul — the most resistant voice to foreign
intervention in the 2016 field — contrasted with the no-holds-barred attack
against Mr. Obama by a possible GOP rival, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. He called
the president’s speech ‘fundamentally unserious’ in a Fox News interview.”

*The Hill blog: Presidential Races: “Cruz: Obama-Clinton foreign policy to
blame for rise of ISIS”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/217374-cruz-obama-clinton-foreign-policy-to-blame-for-rise-of>*

“Cruz also placed the blame for the growth of the Islamic State in Iraq and
Syria on both President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton’s shoulders, a nod to the prospect of both Cruz and Clinton running
for president in 2016, as most observers expect.”

*New Republic: “Five Lessons for Hillary Clinton From Andrew Cuomo's
Primary Scare”
<http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119390/andrew-cuomos-primary-frights-five-lessons-hillary-clinton>*

“These lessons may not hold much relevance for Clinton if she does not face
a serious challenge from the left in 2016.”

*Articles:*

*CNN: “Bernie Sanders challenges Hillary Clinton: ‘Is [she] going to say
that?’”
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/10/politics/clinton-sanders-2016/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_latest+(RSS%3A+Most+Recent)>*

By Dan Merica

September 10, 2014

Washington (CNN) -- Bernie Sanders wants you to know he's talking about the
issues that Hillary Clinton is not.

At the end of a winding answer to a question about how he differs from
Hillary Clinton, the U.S. senator challenged the former secretary of state.

"If we do not get our act together to come up with public policy which
expands the middle class, if we don't overturn Citizens United, if we don't
move to public funding of elections, we are going to live in an oligarchic
form of society," Sanders said. "Now is Hillary Clinton going to say that?"

It was a candid moment and the closest the senator -- who is most known for
being an independent who regularly targets Wall Street and money in
politics -- came to a direct knock on Clinton's possible run at the
presidency during an interview with CNN before his upcoming trip to Iowa.
His comment about Citizens United referred to a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court
decision that opened the floodgates for outside money in politics and
ballooned the amount spent on campaigns.

It was also something that the Vermont senator quickly realized didn't
match his statement, "I am not here to attack Hillary."

"I know Hillary, I respect Hillary Clinton," Sanders said. "I knew her when
she was first lady, I certainly knew her as a colleague in the Senate. "I
don't know if Secretary Clinton is running for president and I have no idea
what she is going to be campaigning on. But I do know what I believe and
what I will be speaking about."

Sanders, who caucuses with Democrats, is trying to thread a needle.

He is little known outside liberal circles, yet the two-term senator is
openly considering a run at the presidency in 2016. He is making the trip
to Iowa this weekend and will speak in New Hampshire in a few weeks.

He is floating the idea of a run with journalists and political operatives
and saying things like,"If I choose to run."

Yet Sanders doesn't want to openly talk about Clinton and says he would
rather focus on his views on the "political," "economic" and "media"
establishments. He is attacking Clinton, something most Democrats aren't
doing, but trying to say he isn't.

Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton communications group, took issue with the
idea that Clinton didn't address the issues Sanders had been addressing.

"Senator Sanders has a good point -- the American people always want a
campaign that includes a spirited dialogue about the issues," said Adrienne
Elrod, the group's communications director. "But Hillary has spent her
entire life turning talk into action, putting policies in place to make
lives better for all Americans."

Coincidentally, Sanders' trip to Iowa this weekend comes at the same time
Clinton will be making her first trip to the critical presidential caucus
state in six years.

Clinton, who is herself openly considering a run at the presidency, will be
the headliner at the politically important Tom Harkin Steak Fry. Thousands
of guests expect to listen to her speak, flip steaks and honor Harkin, the
liberal senator who is retiring after 2014.

Sanders, on the other hand, will not be at the steak fry. He will start the
weekend with a speech at the Fighting Bob Fest, an annual meeting of
progressive speakers in Wisconsin that honors Robert "Fighting Bob" La
Follette, a longtime liberal senator from the Badger State.

Following his speech, where aides expect him to articulate his liberal
platform, Sanders will travel to Iowa for town hall-style events in
Dubuque, Waterloo and Des Moines, respectively.

For Sanders, who has done hundreds of town hall events in his home state,
the Iowa events comes with pros and cons.

Primarily, they allow the senator to get his name out there and gauge
interest in him as a candidate.

"I want to find out what kind of support there is for a progressive agenda
which takes to the needs of a collapsing middle class and the growing
wealth and income inequality America," Sanders said. "It is easy to give a
good speech and get applause, it is not so easy to put together a
grassroots movement of people who are prepared to fight for change."

But they will also offer a glimpse of his uphill climb. While Sanders
speaks to small town halls, Clinton will likely be fawned over by thousands
of supporters at the most political event of the year in Iowa.

Sanders was clear to point out that he does know Harkin, the organizer of
the steak fry, "very well" and was invited "a couple of years ago to be the
guest."

But Sanders sees a bigger positive for him in attending small events and
offering a stark alternative to Clinton.

"I don't think anybody believes that anointment is a good idea, that
anybody is quote unquote entitled to a nomination or any other position,"
Sanders said. "I think what people in Iowa and through the country want to
hear is a vigorous debate about the most important issues which impact
their lives. It is not to say to somebody, 'Oh, thank you, you are going to
be anointed as our candidate.'"

*FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “How The Right
Wing Media Is Using Chuck Todd's Interview To Dismiss Hillary Clinton
Support”
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/10/how-the-right-wing-media-is-using-chuck-todds-i/200727>*

By Olivia Marshall and Sophia Tesfaye

September 18, 2014, 8:22 p.m. EDT

Right wing media have latched onto comments made by new Meet the Press host
Chuck Todd, in which he suggested that Hillary Clinton would not be a
frontrunner in 2016 if not for her gender, dismissing Clinton's support as
merely "enthusiasm to break the glass ceiling."

*Chuck Todd Says Clinton Would Not Be A Frontrunner "If She Were Running To
Be The Second Woman President"*

*Chuck Todd Doubts Hillary Clinton Would Be Frontrunner If She Were Not
Running As The First Woman President.* Chuck Todd, host of NBC's Meet the
Press, appeared on the September 9 edition of PBS' Charlie Rose Show and
said that if Hillary Clinton "were running to be the second woman
president, I think she would not even be considered a frontrunner. She'd
just be considered another candidate":

CHARLIE ROSE: You think her chances have increased or slightly decreased
since -- over the last year?

CHUCK TODD: I put it this way: If she were running to be the second woman
president, I think she would not even be considered a frontrunner. She'd be
just considered another candidate.

I think the -- one thing I think that Washington media gets wrong: There is
a Clinton fatigue problem, but it's in the press corps. I think there is
much less Clinton fatigue in the Democratic Party than there is in the
press corps. Which, by the way, is going to be a separate challenge for
her. The press that's going to cover her is going to cover her with less
enthusiasm and more skepticism than the way Democratic activists are going
to embrace her and be enthusiastic about her.

All that said, she is naturally not the populist liberal that I think the
Democratic Party would like to have. And she's naturally not the -- I don't
want to say isolationist, but she's not somebody who wants a more reserved
foreign policy. She's much more hawkish than where the Democratic Party is
on foreign policy, and she's much more pro-business than where the
Democratic Party is.

So, position wise -- I would argue she's kind of out of step of where the
Democratic Party is going to be in 2016, but I think the enthusiasm to
break that glass ceiling may allow her to overcome those other issues.
[PBS, Charlie Rose Show, 9/9/14]

*Right Wing Media Use Todd's Comments To Denigrate Clinton's Support As
Gender-Based*

*Limbaugh: "Chuck Gets It Right," If Clinton Weren't Female, "Nobody Would
Care."* On the September 9 edition of his radio show, Rush Limbaugh
paraphrased Todd as saying "if it weren't for the fact that she's female,
nobody would care." He added that Democrats want a woman president because
she would be "unassailable":

LIMBAUGH: Well there's F. Chuck saying, "Hey, if it weren't for the fact
that she's female, nobody would care. If there had already been a woman
president, she wouldn't be the frontrunner, nobody cares, it's not a big
deal. She's out of step." That's what I mean. Liberals today getting up
watching their icons on the news, the New York Times, NBC, "Whoa, whoa,
whoa, wait a minute. Hillary out of step?" Yep. But then you see F. Chuck
gets it right. The enthusiasm to break that glass ceiling. The Democrats'
first woman, means she'd be unassailable.

You can't criticize the first woman or you'll be a sexist, just like you
can't criticize the first black American president because that makes you a
racist. And then they'll come up with an Hispanic nominee in 2020 or 2024.
That's what they're going to try. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush
Limbaugh Show, 9/9/14]

*Weekly Standard: Todd Said Hillary "Wouldn't Be A Frontrunner" If She
Weren't Running As First Woman President. *The Weekly Standard highlighted
Todd's comments under the headline: "Todd: Hillary Wouldn't Be Frontrunner
'If She Were Running to Be the Second Woman President'." [Weekly Standard,
9/9/14]

*Media Research Center: "Chuck Todd: Hillary 2016 Obstacle? Liberal Media
Is Sick Of Her."* MRC's Geoffrey Dickens said Todd's comments "handicapped
Hillary Clinton's 2016 prospects" and said that he "stunningly predicted
one of Clinton's biggest obstacles would be the liberal media." He
continued:

However, Todd admitted those hurdles may not be enough to stop Clinton this
time around because "the enthusiasm to break that glass ceiling may allow
her to overcome those other issues." And when Rose noted that "part of the
reason she lost to Obama...was she did not have that historical narrative
which was as powerful as his was in 2008," Todd responded: "This time hers
seems that kind of powerful. It does feel that powerful. [Media Research
Center, 9/9/14]

*Des Moines Register opinion: Kathie Obradovich: “There's nothing moderate
about Bernie Sanders”
<http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/kathie-obradovich/2014/09/11/bernie-sanders-nothing-moderate/15431047/>*

By Kathie Obradovich

September 10, 2014, 11:29 p.m. CDT

WASHINGTON – Every candidate for president has to tell voters who he or she
is. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, should he decide to run, will also have to
explain what he is. He's New Coke, or what New Coke could have been without
the colossal marketing failure that now defines that soft drink launch.

Sanders, 73, of Vermont, is longest-serving independent in the U.S. Senate.
He caucuses with the Democrats. But, as with New Coke, what it says on the
label is nothing like what's in the can. Voters may read "independent" as
"moderate," which is far off the mark for a guy who prefers the term
"Democratic socialist."

There's nothing moderate about Sanders. He speaks of income inequality in
the country as "immoral" and "dangerous. He calls for a massive government
infrastructure rebuilding program to create jobs, plus raising the minimum
wage even higher than the proposed $10.10 per hour.

He explains the phrase "Democratic socialist" by describing attributes of
the democratic socialist states in Scandinavia: government-provided health,
free college educations, generous family leave for new parents.

That means higher taxes — and Sanders has called for increasing estate
taxes for the wealthiest Americans — but he notes Norway and Denmark rank
among the happiest countries on Earth.

This weekend, Sanders is making his second trip to Iowa since May, when he
headlined the Clinton County Democrats' spring fundraising dinner. This
weekend, he'll share airspace with Bill and Hillary Clinton, who will
headline the Harkin Steak Fry on Sunday.

I stopped by Sanders' Senate office in Washington on Monday to inquire
about his intentions. First of all, he's still not sure whether he'll run
for president. "I'm thinking about it. It's obviously a huge undertaking
and I want to make sure that I think it through. It's a very, very big
decision," he said.

Sanders says if he runs, he won't be running against Hillary Clinton, per
se, assuming she runs. But he does draw contrasts. "I know that I voted
against the war in Iraq. It's one of the better votes that I've ever cast,"
he said. Clinton voted to go to war in Iraq, a position that still rankles
with many Democrats.

One of Sanders' first really big decisions would be whether to run as a
Democrat. "It has some advantages and some disadvantages, either route –
running as an independent or running in the Democratic caucus," he said.
"That's something I have to talk to a whole lot of people about if I do
decide to run."

"Look, we're going to run on an agenda which is very anti-establishment,
which is going to speak in very bold terms about taking on the billionaire
class and about proposing ideas which work for the middle class and working
families. And I have to have a sense whether there is support," he said.
"... Is there support among ordinary people for an unprecedented type of
grassroots campaign?"

He said the only way he could win is if he engages people in a new way. "We
have millions and millions of low-income, working people who don't vote,
who aren't registered to vote, don't participate in the political process.
Can we bring them into the system?"

It's easy, he said, to give great speech and say he can do that. "It
remains to be seen."

Sanders says he recognizes he would be an underdog if he runs, but he's not
interested in a campaign just to stimulate debate about progressive issues.
"So, to win, you really need a political revolution."

The Iowa caucuses are ideal, of course, for an insurgent, grassroots
candidacy to take root. But there's no caucus for independents, and Sanders
will likely face suspicion if he tries to run as a Democrat. He seems to
understand it's very difficult to engage voters who are tuned out and
turned off.

If Sanders decides to run, he'll first have to help voters understand
exactly what's under the label. Otherwise, he'll fall flatter than
yesterday's can of New Coke.

*Des Moines Register: “Clintons, Harkin to share stage at final steak fry”
<http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2014/09/11/tom-harkin-final-steak-fry-bill-hillary-clinton-indianola/15431763/>*

By Jason Noble

September 10, 2014, 11:56 p.m. CDT

You know it’s a big event when the 42nd president of the United States is
getting third billing.

Thousands of die-hard Iowa Democrats will gather Sunday on a hot-air
balloon field in Indianola for U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin’s 37th and final
political steak fry as an elected leader.

But while the hearts and minds of attendees will be sentimentally set on
Harkin, a liberal champion retiring after 40 years in Congress, the eyes of
the national political media will focus on featured guest Hillary Clinton —
the once and potentially future presidential candidate who is returning to
Iowa for the first time since her defeat in the 2008 caucuses.

Her husband — some guy named Bill Clinton — will be there, too.

By virtue of the caucuses’ place at the front of the presidential
nomination process and Hillary Clinton’s own deliberate but noncommittal
steps toward a 2016 candidacy, her presence on Sunday guarantees a
political circus.

More than 150 national and international reporters have requested
credentials, organizers said. The cable public affairs channel C-SPAN will
broadcast the event live.

National news sites are already out with stories predicting what her
message will be and how it’ll be received.

The state’s top Democratic activists and political observers predict Bill
and Hillary Clinton and the rest of the lineup will assiduously avoid talk
of 2016, focusing instead on Harkin’s legacy and the immediate task of
electing Democrats in November, including to the U.S. Senate seat he’s
vacating.

Polls show the race between Democrat Bruce Braley and Republican Joni Ernst
is a dead heat. That’s a nationally watched race as one of a handful of
contests that are critical to determining control of the Senate.

“I would imagine that what she is going to do is deflect any questions
about (2016) and talk about Tom Harkin,” said Sue Dvorsky, an activist and
former chairwoman of the Iowa Democratic Party. “That will be viewed as
coy, but I also think that it’s real. That’s why they’re coming. This isn’t
just any steak fry, and this isn’t just any event. This isn’t an event made
up to showcase the Clintons.”

Whatever Clinton says, the optics of the event shouldn’t disappoint the
national reporters and roving TV cameras looking for classic Iowa political
color and hints about 2016.

Organizers are expecting a crowd of around 5,000 — the largest since 2007,
when Clinton was a declared presidential candidate sharing the steak fry
stage with a slate of rivals that included eventual caucus winner and
two-term President Barack Obama.

And an independent group encouraging her 2016 candidacy called Ready for
Hillary will have a huge presence on Sunday, with a custom-decorated bus,
signs, T-shirts and bright-eyed organizers looking to harvest email
addresses and phone numbers from the crowd.

The group has been pushing hard for an enthusiastic turnout among
supporters of a Hillary Clinton presidency. It’s sent out numerous email
blasts encouraging their attendance and even sponsored a national contest
to fly a Clinton fan to Iowa for the event.

A visit to Ready for Hillary’s Des Moines headquarters this week revealed
all manner of swag destined for display at the steak fry, including
4x8-foot barn signs emblazoned with one, definitively punctuated word,
“Ready.”

Also on display were hand fans featuring the iconic photo of Clinton in
sunglasses browsing her phone.

Tickets are still available online through Harkin’s campaign website and
the state Democratic Party site, and will be sold at the gate on Sunday.

Proceeds from the event will be directed to candidates running this year in
Iowa and across the country.

If you go

WHAT: The 37th annual Harkin Steak Fry.

WHERE: National Balloon Classic Balloon Field, 15335 Jewell St. in
Indianola.

WHEN: 1 to 4 p.m. Sunday.

TICKETS: Cost is $30 for adults and $15 for students with a valid student
ID. They’re currently available online at TomHarkin.com and will be sold at
the gateon Sunday. Donors can also attend as “hosts” and “sponsors” for
donations of $250 or $500.

MENU: It’s not just steak (and nothing is actually fried). Attendees will
have their choice of grilled steak or chicken as well as baked beans,
potato salad and a dinner roll. Beer is also available. It’s catered by
Hy-Vee.

WEATHER: It looks ideal, with highs in the mid-60s, partly cloudy skies and
a low chance of rain. If there is rain, the steak fry will go on as
scheduled, organizers said. The stage is covered, although, alas, the grass
fields around it are not.

BRING A SEAT: As an outdoor event with limited seating, attendees are
encouraged to bring blankets or lawn chairs.

TRAFFIC: As in years past, traffic and parking may be challenging. The
campaign is advising that construction on U.S. Highway 69 between Indianola
and Des Moines may slow traffic even further. Allow extra travel time. The
best route to the National Balloon Classic Balloon Field is on U.S. 69 from
the north or south to Indianola and then east on Iowa Highway 92.

*Politico: “Benghazi panel to hear from security experts”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/benghazi-panel-security-experts-110819.html>*

By Lauren French

September 10, 2014, 2:30 p.m. EDT

House lawmakers investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi will
hear next week from three experts on State Department recommendations
designed to increase security at U.S. consulates.

Greg Starr, an assistant secretary for diplomatic security, Mark Sullivan,
the chairman of the Independent Panel on Best Practices and a former Secret
Service director and Todd Keil, a former assistant secretary at Department
of Homeland Security, will brief members on recommendations from a State
Department panel tasked with investigate the militant attacks that killed
Ambassador Chris Stevens.

The three witnesses will testify on the work of the State Department’s
Accountability Review Board - a panel created after the attacks to
investigate the government’s security systems abroad.

But lawmakers won’t hear from former Ambassador Thomas Pickering or retired
Adm. Mike Mullen - the two co-chairs of the review board. Both have made
repeated appearances before congressional panels on the attacks.

Instead the hearing will focus on how the State Department has been
implementing the two dozen recommendations made by the review board since
it issued recommendations in December 2012.

The hearing will be on Sept. 17 at 10 a.m.

*The Hollywood Reporter: “Clintons to Honor Leonardo DiCaprio's
Environmental Activism (Exclusive)”
<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clintons-honor-leonardo-dicaprios-environmental-731964>*

By Tina Daunt

September 10, 2014, 12:03 p.m. PST

The Clinton Global Initiative will mark its 10th anniversary with a
star-studded Manhattan gala and internationalized awards ceremony Sept. 21,
honoring, among others, Leonardo DiCaprio for his environmental activism
and the former president of Kosovo, Atifete Jahjaga, for peacemaking.

While the initiative’s annual meetings always have attracted an A-list of
the world's activists, along with movers and shakers from commerce and
government, this year’s celebratory anniversary includes an expanded
entertainment component. Seth Meyers will host the gathering’s kick-off
event, the 8th annual Clinton Global Citizen Awards, featuring performances
by Aloe Blacc, Natalie Merchant, Jason Mraz and Raining Jane and The Roots.
The awards themselves will be presented by former Secretary of State
Madeline Albright, Eva Longoria and Randy Jackson, stepping away from his
duties as the event’s music director.

“Collaboration and turning ideas into action are core to the ethos of the
Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation, where partnerships in
global health, education and fighting climate change are improving the
lives of millions of people around the world,” Chelsea Clinton told The
Hollywood Reporter. “Hollywood likewise relies on collaboration to bring
creative visions to life and has been an excellent partner to the
Foundation across a number of our efforts. My family is grateful that some
of the most talented, caring and engaged artists in entertainment will help
us shine a light on this year’s Clinton Global Citizen Award honorees and
their extraordinary commitments and work to strengthen communities around
the world."

Former President Bill Clinton, who will attend along with former First Lady
and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and their daughter Chelsea, launched
the awards to honor outstanding individuals in civil society (including the
entertainment industry, philanthropy, public service and the private
sector), who exemplify global citizenship through their vision, leadership
and impact in addressing global challenges.

Apart from DiCaprio, who recently donated $7 million to protect the world's
oceans, and Jahjaga, who not only promoted reconciliation with Serbia but
also EU membership for his nation, this year’s honorees include Greg Asbed
and Lucas Benitez, for their work on behalf of farm workers throughout the
United States, and Hayat Sindi, for her efforts to encourage innovation and
entrepreneurship among young people in the Middle East.

Jackson, who is in his second year as the event's music producer, said it's
important that the performances at the awards ceremony reflect the
"collaborative effort so that speaks to the core of what the Clinton Global
Initiative is all about."

"There will be all types of music from all walks of life," he said. "The
impact of the Clintons' work around the world is just astounding. I've met
Bill and Hillary over the years. What they've done is just amazing to me.
It's about trying to change the world and I wanted to be a part of that."

Just as the annual Davos meeting in Switzerland has become the premier
international form for those hoping to profit from the globalized economy,
the Clinton Initiative has become the year’s top international forum for
those interested in social and environmental change. This year’s gathering
will bring more than 1,000 global leaders from business, government, and
civil society to create and implement “commitments” — programs designed to
address some of the world’s most pressing challenges. To date, members of
the CGI community have made more than 2,900 commitments, which are already
improving the lives of more than 430 million people in over 180 countries.

Along with the Clintons, this year’s attendees will include President
Barack Obama; Jordanian King Abdullah II ibn Al Hussein; Mary Barra, chief
executive officer of General Motors Company; Matt Damon, co-founder or
Water.org; Melinda French Gates, co-chair and trustee of the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation; Jim Yong Kim, president of World Bank Group; Jack Ma,
executive chairman of Alibaba Group; former Treasury Secretary Henry M.
Paulson, Jr., chairman of the Paulson Institute; Ginni Rometty, chairman,
president & CEO of IBM; Darren Walker, president of the Ford Foundation;
and Muhammad Yunus, chairman of Yunus Social Business — Global Initiatives.

*Huffington Post: “Wendy Davis Wants Hillary Clinton For President In 2016”
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/10/wendy-davis-hillary-clinton-2016_n_5798558.html>*

By Ryan Buxton

September 10, 2014, 1:15 p.m. EDT

Wendy Davis is in the middle of her campaign to become the governor of
Texas, and she's hoping she won't be the only woman assuming executive
office in the near future.

"I am expecting a woman in the White House in 2016," Davis told HuffPost
Live's Alyona Minkovski on Wednesday. "And I'm also expecting that Texas is
going to play a role in electing that woman."

Specifically, she's hoping Hillary Clinton will be the one to do it.

"I certainly hope that our former secretary of state will consider moving
forward in that direction," Davis said.

The current Texas state senator joined HuffPost Live to discuss her memoir
Forgetting To Be Afraid and the Texas gubernatorial election, in which she
faces Republican candidate Greg Abbott.

*CNN: “Carney: Obama would give more speeches if networks would let him”
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/10/politics/carney-interview/index.html?hpt=po_c1>*

By Peter Hamby

September 10, 2014

Washington (CNN) -- Former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney -- a
longtime journalist before he joined the Obama administration in its
infancy -- is back in the media game as a political analyst for CNN.

We caught up with Carney on Wednesday, in the hours before President
Obama's addresses the nation to outline his plan for dismantling ISIS, the
brutal terrorist group that's roiling Iraq and Syria.

A former White House insider, Carney had insight into how the president and
his team are preparing for such a major address.

But he also riffed on the state of the news media, the "not ideal" state of
the White House press briefing, Hillary Clinton's potential campaign and
how Twitter has accelerated the political news cycle.

CNN: So pull back the curtain a little bit, if you can, before tonight's
speech. What is happening today? Who is in the room with the president, and
what is he doing in there?

Carney: When speeches are important like this one, the president is the
primary writer of the speech. He will get a draft, a very good one, from
his team. From Ben Rhodes and Cody Keenan. But he will spend a good amount
of time making sure it's really what he wants to say. I am sure as we get
closer to speech time he will be fine-tuning it, working with his team. And
he is keenly aware of the unique opportunity to give a speech to the
nation. They don't come that often. There aren't that many occasions,
outside of a State of the Union address, where a president in this media
age has an audience as big as he'll have tonight.

CNN: From a communications strategy perspective, when do you guys make the
calculation that an issue deserves a national address in primetime?

Carney: The truth is we would do it more, but the networks, especially the
broadcast networks, are not always willing to say yes. The threshold
question is, you know, is it of national significance on a major issue
something that the president feels the American people need to hear about?
Matters of military force are the most obvious circumstances that merit a
prime time address. There are also issues around significant domestic
legislation, or national issues. He did a national speech launching health
care reform that was primetime. It's not a well you can go back to that
often, though, because it requires the networks to give the time. I
remember when I was there, we asked for time once and the networks shot us
down, which was very frustrating. [The White House requested primetime real
estate in April to tout health care enrollment numbers]. We did a little
research, and there was a pretty good case to be made that the reluctance
to give time has increased over the years. The ask we made might have been
granted in past presidencies. But that's just the nature of the business. I
don't think it's going to change.

CNN: How frustrated is the president that Middle Eastern conflict is
consuming his agenda right now, after taking a victory lap by ending the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and after the big 2009 Cairo speech that was
aimed at repairing America's image in the world?

Carney: I don't think he gets surprised or disappointed by the revelation
that the world doesn't bend to your will and your agenda all that
willingly. It's been the fundamental responsibility of being president, and
a huge part of the job, to deal with these kind of crises overseas and
potential threats to the United States. I don't think he is disappointed. I
think he is realistic about the fact that there is still a lot of work he
wants to get done. And he knows that the time he has left will go by pretty
quickly. My guess is that he realizes that the absolutely necessity of
dealing with the Islamic State, and with the situation in Ukraine, reduces
the amount of time and focus he can put on other topics. But it's not
really a choice for him. You don't have the choice you just have to do it.

CNN: The president caught a ton of flak for golfing after making a
statement on the beheading of James Foley. He said on 'Meet The Press' this
weekend that the optics of politics don't come natural to him. The guy is
obviously a talented showman and politician. Does he really not get the
theatrics of politics at this point?

Carney: Here is what I say about that. He definitely doesn't and never has
approached the job in a way that puts a high priority or focus on optics,
and I think thats because 10 years and a few months ago if you passed him
on the street, you wouldn't have known who he was. That makes him wholly
different. What that means is, he is a different kind of person than the
kind of person who normally takes this office. Sometimes that creates
problems, but I also thinks it's why he is president, and why he was
re-elected. You can't be both somebody who emerged from outside Washington
and catapulted onto the scene with a powerful message and also be a known
entity to national political reporters and the general American public as
somebody who was aspiring to the presidency for years. You can't be both.
He is not a typical and never was a typical politician. That's an asset and
a liability.

You can't say, 'I wish he was more like this or that,' because if he were,
he wouldn't be the guy who persuaded more than 50 percent of the country to
vote for him two times in a row. That's a long way of saying he is never
going to be the kind of president who is routinely focused on the optics
and theatrics of the office. Sometimes that's going cause him problems and
frustrate his aides. When that happens, you also have to remember it's part
of who he is.

CNN: Does he ever consult with former President Clinton before big moments
like this? Do they have that kind of relationship these days?

Carney: I don't know how often they talk. I don't think it would
necessarily be before a speech like this, but I could be wrong. He is
certainly close to former Secretary Clinton and to President Clinton. He
saw him not that long ago, in August. But there isn't a regular
conversation that I was aware of. But it's not an infrequent one either.

CNN: We're starting to see blind quotes from Hillary Clinton "aides"
expressing criticism of Obama's handling of Syria and Iraq. If she runs for
president, how does Hillary balance the thornier parts of Obama's record
with her time in the administration?

Carney: Obviously that's something that she will figure out if she decides
to run. She was Secretary of State for President Obama for four years and
she understands that that record that will be part of what she runs on. Her
time as Secretary of State is something she should be proud of, and the
president's record on foreign policy is something she is more likely to
embrace than anything because she was a big part of it.

CNN: So what exactly is the point of White House briefings?

Carney: It's become kind of theatrical and probably less helpful than
either the White House or White House press corps wishes it would be. It's
kind of ironic because now I am contributor on a TV channel, but the reason
that is, by and large, is because of TV. Mike McCurry, my predecessor, one
of Bill Clinton's press secretaries, has apologized to every one of his
successors for being the press secretary who agreed to televise the
entirety of press briefings. Prior to that they were only televised for the
first 10 minutes and then the cameras were turn off. It was inevitable
anyway. But if you look at transcripts of a regular daily briefing in which
the cameras are on, and compare it substantively and tonally to an off
camera briefing on Air Force One — the gaggles that I would do and press
secretaries would do with traveling press the plane. the White House does —
it's a lot of different. The ones not on camera tend to be more sober more
based in information and less gotcha-oriented.

The format is not ideal anymore. The problem is if Josh [Earnest] or any
successor of his were to suddenly announce we weren't doing it anymore tree
would be an uproar by the press, and by the TV press. If they were to say
no more on camera briefings, that would not be accepted.

CNN: Does Twitter make your job easier or more difficult?

Carney: Oh man. Much more difficult. Not in a bad way. It put what was an
already an extremely fast news cycle into warp-speed. Obviously this White
House is the only one that has existed in the era of Twitter. These tools
can be very useful for getting information out. The White House has become
much more Twitter-focused with more people having Twitter handles on staff.
The fact that twitter has become such a driving force in breaking news
creates a whole host of challenges. It's sort of like the challenges that
CNN first created for White Houses back when they were the only 24-hour
television news network. It just changed the pace dramatically. So Twitter
and social media have done that again.

CNN: Last one: What was the dumbest news cycle during your time in the
White House?

Carney: Wow. There are so many to choose from. The first one that came to
mind was the birth certificate saga. There is one every week or every month
competing with serious stuff. Look, everybody finds themselves chasing the
ball down the field sometimes and they wish they hadn't. I think its both
reporters and White House. But everybody ends up being better served,
included readers and viewers of the media, if everybody reverts back to
stuff that actually matters.

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Rand Paul Sounds Cautious
Notes After Obama’s ISIS Speech”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/10/rand-paul-sounds-cautious-notes-after-obamas-isis-speech/>*

By Beth Reinhard

September 10, 2014, 11:39 p.m. EDT

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who recently assailed President Obama for not
acting more decisively against Islamic militants in Syria, sounded more
like his old, cautious self after the president’s speech Wednesday night
calling for air strikes.

Mr. Paul even agreed with Mr. Obama’s statement that the Islamic State,
known ISIL or ISIS, is not Islamic.

“I think there was one important point that he was making about them not
being Islamic or a true form of true Islam,” Mr. Paul said on Fox News,
pushing back on criticism of the speech from interviewer Sean Hannity. “I’m
all in for saying we have to combat ISIS, but also the ultimate war, the
long war, whoever knows how long ultimately, is going to need allies from
civilized Islam.”

In his speech, Mr. Obama had said that ISIS “is not Islamic,” adding that:
“No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of
ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.”

In his Fox comments, Mr. Paul also argued that past U.S. intervention in
the Middle East has created chaos and fomented the spread of radical Islam,
instead of squarely blaming Mr. Obama for the current crisis, as some of
his fellow Republicans have done.

The nuanced remarks by Mr. Paul — the most resistant voice to foreign
intervention in the 2016 field — contrasted with the no-holds-barred attack
against Mr. Obama by a possible GOP rival, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. He called
the president’s speech “fundamentally unserious” in a Fox News interview.

In a sign of his intention to position himself as a foil to Hillary
Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2016, Mr. Cruz
repeatedly referred to the “Obama-Clinton foreign policy.”

On one point Messrs. Cruz and Paul were wholeheartedly in agreement: The
president is violating the constitution by failing to seek permission from
Congress to wage war. Mr. Obama has said he has the authority to take
military action in Syria.

*The Hill blog: Presidential Races: “Cruz: Obama-Clinton foreign policy to
blame for rise of ISIS”
<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/217374-cruz-obama-clinton-foreign-policy-to-blame-for-rise-of>*

By Alexandra Jaffe

September 10, 2014, 10:28 p.m. EDT

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday offered a scathing critique of
President Obama for what he called “fundamentally unserious” remarks
outlining his plan to tackle the growing terrorist threat in the Middle
East.

Cruz also placed the blame for the growth of the Islamic State in Iraq and
Syria on both President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton’s shoulders, a nod to the prospect of both Cruz and Clinton running
for president in 2016, as most observers expect.

“I thought the remarks tonight continued the president’s approach to this
crisis, which is that they were fundamentally unserious,” Cruz said on Fox
News.

He said Obama offered “a defense of the failed Obama-Clinton foreign
policy,” which amounts to “a defense of leading from behind and has led to
most of the world being on fire.”

“What we didnt see tonight was a commander in chief focused on U.S.
national security who stood up and said there are radical Islamic
terorrists who have declared war on the United States…and we will respond
with overwhelming air force ot take them out,” Cruz added.

“Instead, he suggested tareted attacks and focused frankly on political
issues that are peripheral from the central question of how we protect
America from those who WOULD take jihad to our nation.”

Cruz continued to criticize the “Obama-Clinton foreign policy" because, he
said, the two Democrats "are intertwined."

“She was his secretary of State. She was in charge of implementing the
strategy of, quote ‘leading from behind,’ which featured the United States
effectively withdrawing from leadership in the world, and it created a
vacuum into which these players have stepped.”

The senator also decried the Obama-Clinton policy as “photo-op foreign
policy.”

“And so, there have beeen some air attacks, there has been a missile here,
a bomb there. What has been missing is a concrete miltiary objective to
elimiante ISIS, to take them out, becuase they have become qualitatively
more dangerous” as they have grown stronger economically, he said.

But Cruz argued that the president should seek congressional approval
before launching a military campaign, because it will cause Obama to
clarify his goals and approach to the threat.

“You want a demonstration of presidential hubris, look no further than this
speech tonight,” Cruz said.

*New Republic: “Five Lessons for Hillary Clinton From Andrew Cuomo's
Primary Scare”
<http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119390/andrew-cuomos-primary-frights-five-lessons-hillary-clinton>*

By Alec MacGillis

September 10, 2014

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who not so long ago was being touted
seriously as a 2016 presidential prospect (by your humble correspondent,
among others) had a bit of a fright in yesterday’s Democratic primary. He
got only 62 percent of the vote against Zephyr Teachout, a late-entering
challenger who spent one-fortieth as much for her votes as he did, and lost
whole swaths of the state to her by wide margins (Columbia County, adjacent
to my home county in Western Massachusetts, gave Teachout a whopping 78
percent of its vote. She also won easily in Albany County, where Cuomo now
spends most of his time.)

The primary was a dismally low-turnout affair, but you can be sure that it
was attracting interest from at least one denizen of the state: Hillary
Clinton of Chappaqua. Clinton, whose husband has been Cuomo’s boss and role
model, surely gleaned some lessons in Cuomo’s brush with embarrassment on
his left flank. Granted, these lessons may not hold much relevance for
Clinton if she does not face a serious challenge from the left in 2016.
Still, for now, here are some of the warnings—Teachout’s Teachings?—she
ought to take from yesterday:

1. Social issues alone won’t cut it with liberals. Cuomo has made much of
championing his liberalism on social issues, above all same-sex marriage.
But that clearly has not satisfied many liberals in the state who don’t
care for his pro-business centrism on the economic front, where he has
slashed taxes for the corporations and the wealthy. Clinton gets this, to
some degree, which is why she’s been voicing misgivings about rising income
inequality. Still, she can’t seem to help giving $200,000 speeches to
Goldman Sachs bankers.

2. Maybe voters care about ethics and campaign finance, after all. Teachout
and her running mate Tim Wu (an occasional contributor to this magazine)
based their campaign on a good-government platform: arguing for public
campaign financing at the state level, which Cuomo has been decidedly
lukewarm about, and drawing attention to the federal investigation into
Cuomo’s self-interested hobbling of the commission he appointed to propose
ethics reforms for Albany. This sort of stuff isn’t supposed to excite
voters, but it seems to have in this case. Something for Hillary to keep in
mind as her bundlers set out to hoover up Wall Street cash.

3. Beware women challengers. It’s hard to generalize from just one race,
but there may be something about a reformist challenge coming from an
appealing female candidate that makes it more credible. Hillary has
somewhat less to fear in this regard given that she can carry the
glass-ceiling-smashing standard as well. Still…watching Teachout in action
one couldn’t help but think of another zealous reformer who has attracted a
loyal following and has little affection for Hillary Clinton.

4. Don’t belittle your opposition, however minor. Cuomo’s approach to
dealing with the Teachout challenge was to refuse to even acknowledge it.
He declined to debate her, ignored her when she tried to say hello to him,
and refused even to give her his phone number so that she could call to
concede on Tuesdaynight. In hindsight, this boorish behavior seems to have
been a mistake: It won her sympathy with voters and, yes, with the press.
Already, the Clinton camp has been sending out signals that for another
Democrat to run in 2016—even as a respectful sparring partner—would be a
grave affront. This approach only seems likely to elevate whichever brave
soul does decide to step into the ring.

5. Liberals are a restive bunch these days. Who knows what’s behind it:
disappointment with Barack Obama, fury with congressional Republicans,
dismay about soaring inequality. Regardless, liberals seem to be in a
trouble-making mood. You could see it in their rejection of Christine
Quinn, the establishment favorite to succeed Mike Bloomberg in New York;
you can see it in the troubles that Rahm Emanuel is having in Chicago.
Right now, there’s no one openly serious about appealing to that
squirrely-ness in 2016 other than grumpy Bernie Sanders. But if someone
else comes along … you just never know.

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  September 12 – Tokyo, Japan: Sec. Clinton, Christine Lagarde, and
Caroline Kennedy speak at an event on improving the participation of women
in the economy (Washington Post
<http://washpost.bloomberg.com/Story?docId=1376-NBE5HC6TTDS701-5BKDBI2BQLDAGHGNS02DFJ1V12>
)

·  September 12 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Roosevelt
Institute’s Women and Girls Rising Conference (Women and Girls Rising
<http://womenandgirlsrising.strikingly.com/>)

·  September 12 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines a DGA fundraiser (
Twitter <https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/507209428274143234>)

·  September 14 – Indianola, IA: Sec. Clinton headlines Sen. Harkin’s Steak
Fry (LA Times
<http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-tom-harkin-clinton-steak-fry-20140818-story.html>
)

·  September 15 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Transcatheter
Cardiovascular Therapeutics Conference (CRF
<http://www.crf.org/tct/agenda/keynote-address>)

·  September 15 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton speaks at Legal Services
Corp. 40th Anniversary (Twitter
<https://twitter.com/AP_Ken_Thomas/status/507549332846178304>)

·  September 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines a 9/11 Health Watch
fundraiser (NY Daily News
<http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/hillary-clinton-mark-9-11-anniversary-nyc-fundraiser-responders-kin-blog-entry-1.1926372>
)

·  September 19 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the DNC with
Pres. Obama (CNN
<http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/27/politics/obama-clinton-dnc/index.html>)

·  September 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton attends CGI 10th Anniversary (The
Hollywood Reporter
<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clintons-honor-leonardo-dicaprios-environmental-731964>
)

·  September 29 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines fundraiser for DCCC (
Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-headline-dccc-fundraiser-110764.html?hp=l8_b1>
)

·  October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network
Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network
<http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>)

·  October 6 – Ottawa, Canada: Sec. Clinton speaks at Canada 2020 event (Ottawa
Citizen
<http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-speaking-in-ottawa-oct-6>
)

·  October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation
Annual Dinner (UNLV
<http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>)

·  October 14 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes
salesforce.com Dreamforce
conference (salesforce.com
<http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/highlights.jsp#tuesday>)

·  October 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for House
Democratic women candidates with Nancy Pelosi (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-nancy-pelosi-110387.html?hp=r7>
)

 ·  December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)