Subject: MUST READ from Admiral Stuart Platt: Defense News: Commentary: Climate Change Increases Instability for All
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:55:55 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*Defense News: Commentary: Climate Change Increases Instability for All
<http://www.defensenews.com/article/20141027/DEFFEAT05/310270016/Commentary-Climate-Change-Increases-Instability-All>*

By retired Adm. Stuart Platt

October 27, 2014 1:24 p.m. EDT

Recently, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke at Sen. Harry
Reid’s Clean Energy Summit in Nevada, where she announced that climate
change is “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of
challenges” facing us today. She is right on point. It was a strong
statement, in line with her past actions. But what many people might not
know is that climate change isn’t just an issue for environmentalists. It
is also an important one for the armed forces and national security
communities.

In March, the Pentagon published the latest quadrennial defense review, a
standard-bearing report for military strategy, security threats and defense
spending. It reads in part:

“The pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition
while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance
institutions around the world. These effects are threat multipliers that
will aggravate stressors abroad such as poverty, environmental degradation,
political instability, and social tensions — conditions that can enable
terrorist activity and other forms of violence.”

In other words, climate change exacerbates global unrest and worsens
conditions in already unstable countries. Specifically:

■ When droughts and severe storms damage crops, it puts stress on the
global food supply in regions where there is already too little to go
around.

■ When unexpected severe storms sweep through countries and destroy
infrastructure, governments struggle to provide social services for their
people.

■ When people have too few resources, they migrate across borders, leading
to land disputes and ethnic or religious confrontations

■ When crops are the backbone of your economy, crop failures lead to trade
disputes and economic struggles

Like many other complicated ills, climate change knows no barriers. The US
is not immune, especially to potential flooding problems. A large portion
of the American population lives in coastal areas.

In Virginia, for example, the mission readiness of Naval Base Norfolk could
be threatened if major investments are not made to adapt to already rising
sea levels. The Department of Defense has begun work on this, but if
serious actions aren’t taken to curb CO2 emissions and mitigate the effects
of climate change, we will be fighting a losing battle.

Some regions of the world are at higher risk for conflict than others.
Syria is an unfortunate example. The country suffered an extreme and
unusually long drought between 2006 and 2011. Three-fourths of farmers
suffered total crop losses, and President Bashar al-Assad mismanaged water
resources, ultimately displacing 1.5 million Syrians. Many believe that
these circumstances, understood by scientists to be partially the result of
climate change, contributed to the country’s civil war.

Military experts also are greatly concerned about the impending national
security challenges beginning to present themselves as Arctic ice melts
(not to mention how it’s contributing to sea level rise). The melting ice
is opening up the polar region, creating new and uncharted operating areas
for all the world’s navies and commercial vessels — not just for the US.

As shipping routes through the Arctic waters increase, we must be prepared
to defend our interests. Greater access to the Arctic will require more US
naval engagement in the region.

And no matter where a conflict occurs, we are often called upon to bring
prompt relief to at-risk populations, because America is a global leader.
It is a responsibility in which our brave men and women in uniform take
pride.

In short, fighting climate change is about much more than warmer
temperatures. It’s about famine, borders, the economy and yes, terrorism.
Fighting climate change is one of many critical components to stabilizing
the rest of the world. Instability breeds conflicts.

This is why Clinton prioritized addressing climate change at the State
Department. As secretary of state, she appointed a special envoy for
climate change to serve as an adviser on international climate change
policy. She also established the Bureau of Energy Resources, which
addresses the threat of climate change posed by the world’s energy
consumption. These are both important steps for a healthier environment,
but they’re also steps towards a safer world.

And so when Clinton says climate change is “the most consequential, urgent,
sweeping collection of challenges” facing us today, she does so with the
knowledge that it feeds into other serious global issues. The military
understands that it’s not just about warmer temperatures. It’s about
America’s basic national security.