Subject: ​Correct The Record Monday November 24, 2014 Morning Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:18:02 -0500
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Monday November 24, 2014 Morning Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*Bloomberg: “Hillary Clinton Leads in New Hampshire by Historic Margin”
<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-24/hillary-clinton-leads-in-new-hampshire-by-historic-margin-bloomberg-politicssaint-anselm-new-hampshire-poll>*

“Sixty-two percent of likely Democratic voters in the early primary state
said they support Clinton in a new Bloomberg Politics/Saint Anselm New
Hampshire Poll of likely primary voters conducted by Purple Insights.”

*New York Times: “Authors Sign Up to Raise Barnes & Noble’s Sales”
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/business/media/authors-sign-up-to-raise-barnes-nobles-sales-.html>*

“In an effort to increase holiday sales, which have fallen for the last two
seasons, Barnes & Noble is hoping to lure customers into stores this Black
Friday with something book lovers cannot download: signed copies. The chain
recruited 100 prominent authors — including Donna Tartt, David Mitchell,
Dan Brown, E. L. James, Jeff Kinney, George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton —
to each sign roughly 5,000 copies of their latest books.”

*Washington Post: “For Democrats, Hillary Clinton just has to say ‘Go.’ For
voters, she’ll have to say much more.”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/it-was-a-big-day-in-the-big-apple-for-hillary-clinton/2014/11/22/3ef252f8-725d-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html>*

“Ready for Hillary started on a shoestring, dismissed by some in Clinton
world as a quixotic enterprise. It has grown into something far more
important and valuable to a potential candidate…”

*Talking Points Memo: “Hillary's Biggest 2016 Challenge Might Start With An
'O'”
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-obama-approval-rating-2016>*

“The record tells us that, however the Obama presidency is faring like in
its final months, it's going to influence his aspiring successor's White
House ambitions.”

*Real Clear Politics: “Carville: ‘There's Not Much Appetite In Democratic
Party For Somebody Other Than Hillary Clinton’”
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/11/23/carville_theres_not_much_appetite_in_democratic_party_for_somebody_other_than_hillary_clinton.html>*

“On Sunday's edition of This Week, Democratic strategist James Carville
said there's not much appetite for someone other than Hillary Clinton in
the Democratic party and Democrats across the nation.”

*The Daily Beast: Jeff Greenfield: “Want President Hillary? Then Primary
Her”
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/24/want-president-hillary-then-primary-her.html>*

“It would be even more helpful to her election prospects if she were
confronted in the primary with questions more likely to be raised by the
Republican nominee in the fall: was the Russian “reset” policy naive? Was
it wise for the US to leave Iraq without even a residual force in place?
What specific aspect of US foreign policy was changed for the better under
her watch? Does she agree that the Affordable Care Act was offered to the
public under false pretenses?”

*Politico: “Mitch McConnell preps for 2016 battle”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mitch-mcconnell-2016-senate-elections-113123.html>*

“Hillary Clinton could end up at the top of the ballot if she decides to
run and becomes the party’s nominee, a scenario that could boost turnout,
giving Democrats hope that they can increase the gender gap among women
voters after seeing it shrink in 2014.”

*Articles:*

*Bloomberg: “Hillary Clinton Leads in New Hampshire by Historic Margin”
<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-24/hillary-clinton-leads-in-new-hampshire-by-historic-margin-bloomberg-politicssaint-anselm-new-hampshire-poll>*

By Lisa Lerer

November 24, 2014, 6:01 a.m. EST

[Subtitle:] New Hampshire primary voters are ready for Hillary, though they
have some questions about the Democrats.

Hillary Clinton holds a historic lead in the New Hampshire Democratic
primary, although a shift in opinion about the party's brand could be a
drag on her candidacy in the general election.

Sixty-two percent of likely Democratic voters in the early primary state
said they support Clinton in a new Bloomberg Politics/Saint Anselm New
Hampshire Poll of likely primary voters conducted by Purple Insights. It's
an advantage that puts her in elite company: Only former Massachusetts
Senator Ted Kennedy in 1980 and former Vice President Al Gore in 2000 have
broken the 50 percent mark more than six months before the primary.
“Clinton's numbers are so strong that it seems inconceivable that she could
have any serious challenger,” said Neil Levesque, executive director of the
New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College.

While she leads in the primary, the results harbor dangerous signals for
Democrats. When asked which party's nominee is more likely to “care about
people like you,” a trait traditionally associated with Clinton's party,
voters were almost equally divided, with 40 percent saying Democrats and 39
percent picking Republicans. In exit polls conducted after the 2012
presidential election, 55 percent of New Hampshire voters sided with
President Barack Obama and 42 percent with former Massachusetts Governor
Mitt Romney when asked to select the candidate who “is more in touch with
people like you.”

“Republicans are sticking to pocketbook issues and focusing on reigning the
government in,” said Kerry Marsh, a Manchester-based Republican strategist
with Spectrum Marketing Companies. “I think we're finally doing that right.”

Though New Hampshire is a small state, it has voted for the winner of the
White House in eight of the last nine presidential elections. Clinton runs
nearly even with Romney in a head-to-head match-up, with 46 percent of
likely general election voters selecting the former first lady and
secretary of state and 45 percent selecting the former Massachusetts
governor. She has a wider lead—7 percentage points—against Kentucky Senator
Rand Paul and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, whom she beats 47-39 among
the same group.

A surprise upset by Clinton in 2008 saved her presidential bid and marked
the start of a five-month primary slog with Obama. “As I caution all
presidential candidates in New Hampshire, taking New Hampshire for granted
is very dangerous,” said Terry Shumaker, a Manchester attorney and Clinton
supporter. “Last time, I believe, Hillary Clinton had an almost 30-point
lead in the polls in our state in the summer. That lead melted like an ice
sculpture on the mall in July and she came back and won our primary by
three points.”

Her primary win highlighted another quirk of the Granite State: women rule.
Female politicians currently hold the governor's mansion and every seat in
the congressional delegation. (That will change in January, when Republican
Frank Guinta replaces Democrat Carol Shea-Porter.) “Unlike past human
history, being a woman in New Hampshire is an advantage in any Democratic
primary and with the independents as well,” said Ray Buckley, the chairman
of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. “All things being equal, our primary
voters would tend to vote for a woman.”

Among all likely voters in the state, Clinton has the highest favorability
rating with 51 percent of voters expressing a positive opinion about her.
Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte and Romney, who owns a vacation home in the
state, came in second at 47 percent each.

While her lead hardly guarantees the nomination, Clinton's dominance in the
early polling may deter other Democrats from jumping into the race.
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, at 13 percent support, comes the
closest to Clinton of any potential Democratic challenger, though voters
are pretty much split in their opinions of her with 34 percent rating her
favorably and 35 percent giving her a negative review.

Other candidates, including Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley, Vice
President Joe Biden, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, and independent
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, lag in the single digits.

New Hampshire Democrats attribute at least a piece of her edge to the
Clinton family's long history in the state. “Former President Bill Clinton
has been here yearly for decades,” Buckley said. “They first came up in
'79. So, there's a long, long relationship with the Clintons' and New
Hampshire.”

The poll, which was conducted Nov. 12-18, has a margin of error of plus or
minus 4.9 percent for questions regarding the Democratic primary, and 4.4
percent for those asked of all likely voters.

*New York Times: “Authors Sign Up to Raise Barnes & Noble’s Sales”
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/business/media/authors-sign-up-to-raise-barnes-nobles-sales-.html>*

By Alexandra Alter

November 23, 2014

In an effort to increase holiday sales, which have fallen for the last two
seasons, Barnes & Noble is hoping to lure customers into stores this Black
Friday with something book lovers cannot download: signed copies.

The chain recruited 100 prominent authors — including Donna Tartt, David
Mitchell, Dan Brown, E. L. James, Jeff Kinney, George W. Bush and Hillary
Clinton — to each sign roughly 5,000 copies of their latest books. The
company will distribute the 500,000 signed books among its more than 650
retail stores.

“Customers get inundated with discounts and offers from every other
retailer,” said Mary Amicucci, vice president for adult trade and
children’s books at Barnes & Noble. “The goal was to find an exciting
reason for people to come to Barnes & Noble early in the morning and get
something that they can’t get on any other day of the year.”

Drawing customers into its physical stores has become an urgent priority
for Barnes & Noble. The chain has been battered in recent years by
competition from Amazon and by a sluggish book market. It has closed more
than 20 stores since summer 2013 and will spin off its money-losing Nook
division into a separate company next year.

Holiday sales at its retail stores and website have declined for the last
two seasons. In 2013, sales in the nine-week holiday period fell nearly 7
percent to $1.1 billion compared with the previous year, and in 2012, sales
fell nearly 11 percent to $1.2 billion.

Ms. Amicucci said the initiative began seven months ago when Barnes & Noble
compiled a wish list of 50 authors. When the first batch of authors
responded enthusiastically, the company recruited another 50. Some authors
went further, adding little illustrations to the books. Brandon Stanton,
the author of “Humans of New York,” drew dinosaurs, while Mo Willems, a
children’s book author, sketched his popular pigeon character.

Some authors said they hoped the new campaign would help the struggling
chain.

“The presence of a bookstore in a neighborhood matters,” said Lisa
Scottoline, who signed 5,000 copies of her novel “Betrayed.” “If it’s not
physically present, we will have fewer readers.”

David Baldacci, who signed several thousand copies of his new book, “The
Escape,” said he hoped the effort would help the last big bookstore chain
standing to better compete against Amazon. “You can go online and buy any
book you want, but there’s not a lot of excitement with clicking the buy
button,” he said.

Independent bookstores are also counting on authors to draw customers for
the holidays, a period when many of them make as much as 30 percent of
their annual sales. As part of the American Booksellers Association’s
“Indies First” holiday initiative, about 1,200 authors will sign books,
greet customers and, in some cases, work behind the counter at more than
400 independent bookstores around the country this Saturday.

As part of the effort, the fantasy and graphic novelist Neil Gaiman and his
wife, the author, musician and performance artist Amanda Palmer, will be at
the Golden Notebook in Woodstock, N.Y., and two other New York bookstores;
Geraldine Brooks will work alongside booksellers at Bunch of Grapes
Bookstore in Vineyard Haven, Mass.; and Sherman Alexie will volunteer at
three Seattle-area bookstores.

Oren Teicher, chief executive of the American Booksellers Association, said
author appearances and signed copies were among the best weapons
brick-and-mortar stores had against online retailers.

“Books are identical no matter where you buy them,” he said. “You don’t get
a different or better ending if you buy them from us.”

*Washington Post: “For Democrats, Hillary Clinton just has to say ‘Go.’ For
voters, she’ll have to say much more.”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/it-was-a-big-day-in-the-big-apple-for-hillary-clinton/2014/11/22/3ef252f8-725d-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html>*

By Dan Balz

November 22, 2014

NEW YORK — It was all Hillary Clinton, all day, Friday in New York, a day
that helped crystallize how much already has been done for the prospective
presidential candidate by others and, more importantly, what she has yet to
do for herself.

The events included a day-long session for the donors to Ready for Hillary,
the political action committee founded in early 2013 to help encourage
Clinton to run for president. She did not appear at the event, but many of
the Clinton clique were there.

In the evening, it was the former secretary of state herself in the
limelight at a black-tie gala hosted by the New-York Historical Society
Museum & Library, where she was given the History Makers award.

Ready for Hillary started on a shoestring, dismissed by some in Clinton
world as a quixotic enterprise. It has grown into something far more
important and valuable to a potential candidate whose top-down campaign in
2008 was one (but not the only) factor that led to her defeat to Barack
Obama in the contest for the Democratic nomination.

Because of the work of Ready for Hillary, if Clinton decides to run for
president, she will instantly have access to what the group’s leaders say
is a list of roughly 3 million people who have signed up as supporters,
volunteers, donors or all of the above. Ready for Hillary will shut down if
and when Clinton announces her candidacy. The list can’t simply be handed
over to her, but she will easily be able to convert fruits of the
organization’s efforts into a Hillary for President ground army.

Many people deserve credit for this. One is Adam Parkhomenko, the young and
tireless co-founder of the group, who has been looking to help make Clinton
president of the United States since he was in high school and who overcame
the doubters with his energy and a strategic grasp of the techniques and
imperatives of the most modern of campaigns.

Another who gets credit is Craig Smith, who has been part of the Clintons’
world for more than two decades and whose arrival at Ready for Hillary
signaled to many longtime Clinton loyalists — and donors — that the
organization deserved their backing, financial and otherwise. About $10
million has been raised since the founding.

Friday’s gathering in New York seemed very much like both a Clinton
political family reunion and the gathering-before-the-storm. In attendance
were scores of people from across the country, many of them instrumental in
helping Bill Clinton become president, some who served him as president,
and all of them now are just as determined to see Hillary Clinton get to
the White House in her own right.

The speakers constituted a who’s who of Clinton loyalists, from strategists
James Carville and Paul Begala to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to
former White House deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes. Equally notable were
those from Obama’s political orbit and others who are now part of the Ready
for Hillary operation or any of the other pro-Clinton political committees
and organizations that have been founded in the past two years.

Without doing anything other than not saying “no” to a second presidential
campaign, without having to make any of the hard calls of putting a
campaign together, Hillary Clinton has benefitted enormously from the work
of all these people. It’s fair to say that no one seeking the Democratic
nomination — no one who wasn’t already an incumbent president at least —
will have the kind of machinery in place that now exists for her.

One example: Jerry Crawford, the Iowan who has been a top adviser through
all the Clintons’ campaigns, told reporters Friday that the work of Ready
For Hillary has been “extraordinary” in preparing for a 2016 candidacy.

“We will be at or beyond on day one of the Clinton campaign, if and when it
comes, where we ended up last time,” he said.

What Clinton hasn’t yet done for herself, however, remains the key to her
real hopes of winning the White House. One is to organize a campaign that
is more disciplined and more strategic than her campaign of 2008. She
cannot afford another messy campaign operation, and how she avoids that
will take considerable thinking.

Still, machinery doesn’t win elections, which means the second and more
important step for her is to know exactly why she wants to run for
president again and how she is alike and different from her husband and
Obama, and then to be able to articulate those reasons in a compelling and
forward-looking message.

Clinton is nibbled from all sides as she thinks through the rationale for a
campaign. On the left are rising demands for a populist economic message of
the kind associated with Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. She has
edged toward that, but sometimes awkwardly, as when she said last month,
“businesses don’t create jobs,” a shorthand that baffled nearly everyone by
its inarticulateness.

For Bill Clinton, opportunity — not class warfare — long has been at the
core of his message. Hillary Clinton, however, runs in different times than
did her husband, a time of greater inequality and underlying frustration.
The balancing act is more challenging today than it was for him.

At the award dinner Friday night, Hillary Clinton picked up on the theme of
opportunity in a conversation with author Walter Isaacson. He asked her how
having a granddaughter has affected her thinking.

After the usual grandmotherly statements about how special her
granddaughter is and will be, she took note of the world of privilege into
which baby Charlotte was born and will be raised. But then she noted that
many other children born on the same day as her granddaughter would grow up
in circumstances far more challenged and challenging. “Talent is
universal,” she said. “Opportunity is not.”

Can candidate Clinton articulate with both specificity and inspiration how
to widen the circle of opportunity?

Her prospective candidacy offers the possibility of the first female
president in history, but for all the power behind that aspiration, it is
not a message. Nor, as the midterms proved, are narrow appeals to women of
the kind that fell short for Democratic candidates for Senate in Iowa and
Colorado — two states vitally important in a general election.

Nor can she count on the “demography is destiny” theme that many Democrats
see as their ace in the hole in future presidential campaigns. In the
corridors at the Ready For Hillary meeting, more than one Clinton loyalist
said that will not be enough to win in 2016.

The black-tie dinner was also a reminder of the potential gap between
Clinton and the voters she will appeal to if she is a candidate. Much of
the conversation with Isaacson was about the Roosevelts — Franklin, Eleanor
and Teddy. One point made by both Clinton and Isaacson was that while the
Roosevelts came from privileged circumstances, they found in public service
ways to advocate for those without.

At the Ready For Hillary meeting, one person, who did not want to be
identified in order to speak more candidly, said she should run for
president not as Hillary Clinton but as “Hillary Smith,” shorn of accolades
and awards that have come at her for so many years. It was good advice, not
exactly starting over, but starting fresh.

What Friday reinforced is what many in her party recognize. Democrats may
be ready for Hillary. The bigger question is: When will Hillary be ready?

*Talking Points Memo: “Hillary's Biggest 2016 Challenge Might Start With An
'O'”
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-obama-approval-rating-2016>*

By Dylan Scott

November 24, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EST

One of the most important elements of a Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential
candidacy might be completely out of her hands.

Two of the favored rhetorical questions around her presumed bid are: How
much will she distance herself from President Barack Obama? And, relatedly,
will she be able to capture the Obama coalition that propelled the
President to victory twice, but hasn't shown up in the midterm elections?

They are of course linked: If Obama is unpopular, a Clinton campaign will
be tempted to present a sharp contrast. At the same time, the President
will likely remain popular with the core Democratic base that she needs to
harness. But the record tells us that, however the Obama presidency is
faring like in its final months, it's going to influence his aspiring
successor's White House ambitions.

The third-term problem is a historical fact at this point: U.S. voters just
don't choose to give a party three (or more) consecutive terms in the White
House. Since FDR, George H.W. Bush is the only President to be elected to
succeed a two-term predecessor from the same party.

Political scientists have documented the link between presidential approval
rating and final vote tallies (regardless of whether it is an open election
or an incumbent is running.) In a 2012 book, "The Timeline of Presidential
Elections", Columbia University's Robert Erikson and the University of
Texas's Christopher Wlezien concluded that presidential approval rating is
one of the best indicators of what the actual vote will look like.

"(Obama's) approval rating has real bearing on 2016," Wlezien told TPM in
an email.

The link might not be as strong as it otherwise would be when a President
is running for re-election, John Sides, a political scientist at George
Washington University, told TPM. But based on his own look at the data,
Sides said, it still has an effect on an open race, as 2016 will be.

"When the incumbent is not running, better approval ratings still appear to
help the incumbent party's new candidate," he said, "but the relationship
is weaker."

If better approval ratings help, then worse ones could surely hurt. Obama
is currently sitting at 42 percent, according to Gallup. He was at 52
percent when he won re-election in 2012 with 51 percent of the popular
vote. Reagan was polling at 51 percent in October 1988 and Bush took 53
percent of the popular vote, per the archive of Gallup polls compiled by
the University of Connecticut.

Much has already been made of any moments in which Clinton has been
perceived to be distancing herself from the President. The response to her
interview with The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg, in which she appeared to
criticize the Obama White House's "don't do stupid stuff" mantra in foreign
policy, was a classic example. It can sometimes be overwrought.

Things could certainly change by November 2016. Reagan sank as low as 43
percent in March 1987 by the end of the Iran Contra scandal. He had managed
to recover by the time Bush was on the ballot. Still, it will be important
for Clinton to avoid being lumped in with the Obama administration or even
the first Clinton administration, one Democratic strategist advocating for
a Hillary 2016 bid said.

"If she decides to run, she should not run as a third Bill Clinton term or
a third Barack Obama term," Craig Smith, Clinton White House political
director and a senior adviser to the Ready for Hillary PAC, said on Friday
when asked by TPM. "She should run for a first Hillary Clinton term."

How easy will that be, given the historical precedents and her tenure as
one of the top Cabinet officials in the Obama administration?

"As long as she lays out a clear vision of where she wants to take this
country and a clear message about why she's doing this," he said, "I think
it'll be fine."

Republicans, for their part, seem intent on linking Clinton to the Obama
presidency as frequently as possible. It has already become a staple of GOP
messaging, and the anti-Clinton PAC America Rising has purchased an online
home for it: Obama3rdTerm.com.

"There is no major issue in which Sec. Clinton and President Obama
disagree. She was the Mother of Obamacare, the face of his foreign policy,
and a behind the scenes advocate for all his domestic initiatives," Tim
Miller, America Rising PAC's executive director, told TPM in an email. "Any
idea that she will be able to effectively distance herself from him ignores
reality."

*Real Clear Politics: “Carville: ‘There's Not Much Appetite In Democratic
Party For Somebody Other Than Hillary Clinton’”
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/11/23/carville_theres_not_much_appetite_in_democratic_party_for_somebody_other_than_hillary_clinton.html>*

[No Writer Mentioned]

November 23, 2014

On Sunday's edition of This Week, Democratic strategist James Carville said
there's not much appetite for someone other than Hillary Clinton in the
Democratic party and Democrats across the nation.

"When Secretary Clinton runs," Carville definitively said, "she's going to
run on her own agenda and think there's going to be a lot."

"There's not much appetite in the Democratic party and around the country
for somebody other than Hillary Clinton. This is something that they make
up," Carville said to host George Stephanopoulos.

"The Republicans will need all the help they want to win a presidential
race. I'm not worried. Everything helps Republicans if you listen to them.
Obama helps Republicans. Hillary is going to help Republicans. I mean, the
sun coming up helps Republicans. Why don't they win some elections?"
Carville added.

JAMES CARVILLE: All evidence is from '94 to '96, from 2010 to 2012. All
evidence is that it doesn't matter. It's a different kind of an event. Now,
I think that when Secretary Clinton runs, she's going to run on her own
agenda and think there's going to be a lot. I think she's going to take
this thing very seriously, is going to run very hard and I think --

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, THIS WEEK: where does she break for President Obama?
where does she break from President Obama?

CARVILLE: I think she'll say he's done remarkable things as president but
the one thing we haven't done -- the great unfinished work for this nation
is how do we build a middle class and that was the one thing that I want to
do. That is the great that the United States is faced with is we have lost
our essence because we're becoming too separated by income and everything
else. I think that's her message and she can be as critical as she wants
about that...

I think that beltway liberals -- and I believe this, and I really respect
you and I like your magazine (The Nation), there's not much appetite in the
Democratic party and around the country for somebody other than Hillary
Clinton. This is something that they make up --

MATTHEW DOWD, ABC NEWS: It's true and it's going to help Republicans in the
general election.

CARVILLE: Again, I go out there --

DR. BEN CARSON: I agree with you.

CARVILLE: And you go watch it. The Republicans will need all the help they
want to win a presidential race. I'm not worried. Everything helps
Republicans if you listen to them. Obama helps Republicans. Hillary is
going to help Republicans. I mean, the sun coming up helps Republicans. Why
don't they win some elections?

*The Daily Beast: Jeff Greenfield: “Want President Hillary? Then Primary
Her”
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/24/want-president-hillary-then-primary-her.html>*

By Jeff Greenfield

November 24, 2014

[Subtitle:] How Michael Dukakis’s failure in 1988 shows how helpful a
tough, drawn-out primary can be for the Democratic frontrunner.

I asked Google to find stories about a potential challenge to Hillary
Clinton’s presumed Presidential run, and in about a third of a second, I
was offered 37,500,000 of them.

There’s no point in recycling the same list of possible foes, nor the
competing arguments for and against a contested nomination. (There’s an
excellent take that appeared on this site last September: Yes, sometimes a
contest be invigorating—Reagan in ’80, Clinton in ’92, Obama in ’08—and
sometimes it can open wounds that never heal—Goldwater in ’64, McGovern in
’72, Ford in ’76, Carter in ’80.

But if you’re looking for a telling example of a politically helpful
primary challenge, there’s no better example than one that should have
happened, almost happened, but didn’t.

It happened—or didn’t—in 1988, when Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis
was grinding his way to the Democratic nomination. Two potentially major
rivals had long since been sidelined: Senator Joe Biden by charges of
plagiarism, and former Senator Gary Hart by—well, you know. Those in the
race—Senator Paul Simon, Rep. Dick Gephardt, Rev. Jesse Jackson—were far
behind. Another dark horse, Tennessee Senator Al Gore, was finding little
traction in his efforts to become a centrist alternative.

Gore’s last stand would be in the New York primary. On April 12, during a
debate sponsored by the Daily News, Gore confronted Dukakis with an issue
that had not surfaced at any time during the campaign. Why, Gore wanted to
know, did Dukakis support a state program that gave weekend furloughs to
convicted criminals, even after some of those prisoners had committed
crimes while on furlough? The audience booed the question, Dukakis went on
to win the New York primary convincingly, and Gore dropped out of the
Presidential race.

If you’re familiar with recent political history, you know what happened
next. James Pinkerton, a policy aide in the campaign of George H.W. Bush,
found press reports that detailed the story of Willie Horton—a convicted
murder who, while out on furlough, had terrorized a Maryland couple and
raped the woman. Bush campaign chief Lee Atwater watched focus groups move
sharply away from Dukakis when they learned of the story. (Atwater said at
one point that by the time the campaign was over, voters would think of
Horton as Dukakis’ running mate). Bush himself raised the furlough
issue—without mentioning Horton by name—during his RNC acceptance speech,
and the campaign featured an ad showing showing men in prison garb moving
through a revolving door.

Then an independent campaign—the National Security Political Action
Committee—put on its own ad, showing the mug shot of Willie Horton looking
very menacing and very, very black. To this day, Bush media maven Roger
Ailes adamantly denies that he or the campaign had any role in the Willie
Horton mug shot ad. And to this day, liberals in the political world use
the name “Willie Horton” to describe an appeal to primal racial fears.

Now consider a different question: suppose Al Gore had stayed in the race.
Or suppose another of Dukakis’ opponents—Jesse Jackson, most
intriguingly—had kept the question alive. Was it really a good idea to
furlough convicted murderers? Was it a mistake to veto the bill that would
have curtailed such furloughs?  For a one-time political operative like
myself, it offers the possibility of a rarely seen event in campaigns: the
open, frank admission of a mistake.

“Candidates always like to tell you what they did right,” I imagine Dukakis
saying. “Now I want to tell you what I did wrong—and what I learned from
it. Giving prisoners a chance at redemption is a good idea; but we were too
careless, and innocent people suffered because it it. I think it taught me
to ask harder questions about good intentions; it’s a lesson I intend to
remember as President.”

I’m not suggesting that it would have changed the outcome of the 1988
election; and you have to question the overall tactical shrewdness of any
campaign that sent its candidate riding around in a tank looking like
Snoopy heading out to fight the Red Baron.

What the “missing furlough” debate does tell us, however, is that a
candidate who is not confronted by a tough policy challenge in a primary
may wind up unprepared for that challenge in the fall, which of course is
the moment when it matters most. Republicans, for example, may have found
intra-party attacks on Mitt Romney’s business career offensive; they are,
after all, the party of the “builders”. Democrats, as Romney should have
remembered from his campaigns in Massachusetts, have no such compunctions.
Democrats will not take kindly to criticism of pubic employee unions, which
provide cash and foot soldiers for the party; a candidate too close to
those unions should not be surprised to find herself under fire come Autumn.

How does this apply to She Who Must Always Be Named?

Much of the conversation has focused on potential challenges from the Left.
Is Clinton too close to the Wall Street-Goldman Sachs wing of the
Democratic Party? Does she need to distance herself from the deregulatory
policies of the Bill Clinton years? Is she too hawkish for the activists
who helped make her vote for the Iraq War so costly back in the 2008
campaign?

It would be even more helpful to her election prospects if she were
confronted in the primary with questions more likely to be raised by the
Republican nominee in the fall: was the Russian “reset” policy naive? Was
it wise for the US to leave Iraq without even a residual force in place?
What specific aspect of US foreign policy was changed for the better under
her watch? Does she agree that the Affordable Care Act was offered to the
public under false pretenses?

If these issues raise uncomfortable questions for Democrats, Clinton has
reasons not to be too unsettled. She no doubt remembers that another
candidate for President had to explain his break with many root assumptions
that Democrats held about issues ranging from crime to trade to welfare.
And that debate during the 1992 primaries worked out pretty well for the
nominee.

*Politico: “Mitch McConnell preps for 2016 battle”
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mitch-mcconnell-2016-senate-elections-113123.html>*

By Manu Raju

November 24, 2014, 5:39 a.m. EST

[Subtitle:] Facing a daunting map, Republicans are already plotting ways to
hang onto their new Senate majority.

Mitch McConnell spent years charting the Republican path back to power —
and now he’s already plotting to make sure they don’t lose it.

The Kentucky Republican is quietly pushing his fellow Republican senators
to beef up their political shops. He’s considering a new super PAC that
could spend millions on Senate races. And he’s locking down operatives for
another cycle who were key to GOP triumphs this month.

The under-the-radar moves less than three weeks after the 2014 midterms and
a month-and-a-half before McConnell takes over for Harry Reid makes clear
the brutal reality in front of Republicans: Their majority could be short
lived.

Republicans face a daunting map in 2016, when they will be forced to defend
24 seats in a presidential year, while Democrats have to defend only 10
seats — a scenario McConnell is taking so seriously he’s leaving nothing to
chance, starting now.

“You can start too late, but never too soon,” McConnell said in an
interview in the Capitol hallways last week, citing the words of the late
Happy Chandler, a former Kentucky senator turned commissioner of baseball.

Last week, McConnell summoned all 24 Republicans up for reelection in 2016
to a morning meeting at the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which
was even attended by potential 2016 presidential candidates like Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio, who has said he wouldn’t run for the White House and
Senate at the same time. At the meeting, McConnell and Mississippi Sen.
Roger Wicker, the new NRSC chairman, made a blunt declaration to their
colleagues: Reelection, they said, starts now.

With the NRSC’s new executive director, Ward Baker, and the deputy
executive director, Kevin McLaughlin, the two GOP operatives made a
presentation of how much campaigns have changed since the senators last ran
in 2010, even noting iPhones were just a couple years old back then and
iPads had just come on market. They implored their candidates to begin a
heavy fundraising push immediately, and tried to tell them on what to
expect in the ad war.

For instance, the GOP projected based on past trends that 83,000 radio and
TV spots from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee alone would air
in all 2016 Senate races. And McConnell detailed how he shrewdly adjusted
his tactics to pull off a resounding primary and general election victory
for a sixth term in 2014.

In the 35-minute discussion, the GOP leaders and top operatives also urged
Republican senators to immediately hire their own pollsters, consultants
and staff, given there will be a major competition for operatives with the
crowded 2016 GOP presidential primary about to take shape. If there are
certain staff who need training, they said, the NRSC was prepared to help
groom them.

“Members need to begin to do the things to tool their campaigns
differently, to understand the significant change in resource needs,” Sen.
Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said, recounting the message from the meeting. “And
now is the time to begin to think about the mechanics of the campaigns.”

Burr, who is up for reelection for a third term in 2016, has just $720,000
in cash in a state where more than $100 million was spent in the 2014 North
Carolina Senate race, in which Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan narrowly lost to
Republican Thom Tillis. But despite the lack of money, Burr said he plans
on running and even seemed ready to take on Hagan if she were to run
against him.

“Repeats in North Carolina, historically, don’t work too well,” Burr said
in an interview. “You have to ask yourself, how many people will write a
check to somebody who just lost?”

In 2014, retirements became a major problem for Democrats, as they lost
open seats vacated by retiring members in Montana, West Virginia and South
Dakota. McConnell, a former NRSC chairman himself who has spent years
studying campaigns in other states and spent an inordinate amount of time
strategizing with NRSC officials this past cycle, is expected to eventually
set a deadline for when lawmakers need to announce whether they will retire.

Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk, a freshman Republican who suffered a stroke in
2012 and travels around the Capitol in a wheelchair, said he was “doing
everything possible” to prepare for a run and win potentially tough primary
and general election races in 2016. Other potential retirees, like Indiana
Sen. Dan Coats and Arizona Sen. John McCain, have also sent signals they
are likely to run again, buoyed by the fact that they are no longer in the
minority.

After last week’s NRSC meeting, Wicker felt bullish.

“I don’t expect any [GOP] retirements,” Wicker said confidently in an
interview. “I do not. I think we are excited about the chance to govern,
the chance to legislate as the founders intended, I think there’s a lot of
enthusiasm, yes.”

Donors, he said, are feeling much happier, and many have dumped big bucks
early into the campaign accounts of Republican senators who have held a
bevy of fundraisers at the NRSC since Election Day.

“People need to start to get prepared,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the
No. 2 Senate Republican who attended the meeting.

The Republican path to keep the Senate won’t be easy. They have to defend
seats in blue states and swing states, like Pennsylvania, New Hampshire,
Ohio, Florida, Illinois and Wisconsin — compared to just 10 for Democrats.
Moreover, Democrats could have some serious statewide recruits. In recent
interviews, two Democratic senators who lost this year — Arkansas’ Mark
Pryor and Alaska’s Mark Begich — punted on their intentions to run in 2016
in their respective states, though they didn’t rule it out.

“We’ll see,” Begich said when asked if he’d run against Sen. Lisa Murkowski
(R-Alaska) in 2016.

Plus, Hillary Clinton could end up at the top of the ballot if she decides
to run and becomes the party’s nominee, a scenario that could boost
turnout, giving Democrats hope that they can increase the gender gap among
women voters after seeing it shrink in 2014.

With Democratic turnout typically higher in an election year and a
big-spending Democratic super PAC, Senate Majority PAC, prepared to dump
tens of millions into the effort to bring its party back to the majority,
McConnell is seeking more effective ways to spend GOP money.

Josh Holmes, McConnell’s chief political adviser, is holding private
conversations with donors and operatives to see if there’s interest to form
a new super PAC dedicated to helping Senate Republicans retain the
majority. Currently, a bevy of big-spending GOP outside groups influence
key races, including the Karl Rove-linked American Crossroads, as well as
the Koch brothers’ Americans for Prosperity. But in 2016, their attention
may focus on the presidential race.

Plus, Holmes has identified at least $8 million spent by smaller super PACs
on individual races in 2014 that Republicans believe could have been better
spent this cycle.

Holmes declined to comment, but a decision on whether to create a specific
Senate GOP super PAC is expected to be made by the first quarter of the
year.

So far, Wicker said, GOP donors are feeling good.

“In 2012, we got off to a tough start because our donors were so
discouraged that we actually lost ground in the Senate as well as the
presidency,” Wicker said. “We’re now in an era of good feeling and our
donors believe in us and we need to get started early.”

One of the ways to instill confidence was to ensure there is continuity at
the NRSC. McConnell sung the praises of Baker during the 2014 elections and
pushed for him to stay. McLaughlin, a close friend of Holmes’, was a key
force in the GOP effort to train Republican candidates in 2014 and avoid
the Todd Akin-like gaffes that doomed past Republican chances.

The NRSC team didn’t wait until after November to begin pushing Republicans
up in 2016 to get their campaigns in order. Since May, top NRSC officials
have held three meetings with the chiefs of staff for all of the 24
Republican senators, including one right before the election. The No. 1
goal for the party, the GOP operatives said, is incumbent retention,
something that Republicans recognize won’t be easy in 2016.

“Obviously, I’m going to be the No. 1 target,” said Sen. Ron Johnson
(R-Wis.) when asked about his race for a second term. “I don’t dispute that
whatsoever.”

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  December 1 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton keynotes a League of
Conservation Voters dinner (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-green-groups-las-vegas-111430.html?hp=l11>
)

·  December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)

·  December 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton honored by Robert F. Kennedy
Center for Justice and Human Rights (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/hillary-clinton-ripple-of-hope-award-112478.html>
)

·  February 24 – Santa Clara, CA: Sec. Clinton to Keynote Address at
Inaugural Watermark Conference for Women (PR Newswire
<http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillary-rodham-clinton-to-deliver-keynote-address-at-inaugural-watermark-conference-for-women-283200361.html>
)