Subject: Correct The Record Sunday February 15, 2015 Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:32:17 -0500
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Sunday February 15, 2015 Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*Orlando Sentinel opinion: Rep. Patrick Murphy: “Hillary: A leader for the
middle class: My Word”
<http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-ed-hillary-clinton-my-word-20150213-story.html>*

“As the nation turns its eyes to 2016, we need leaders with a true
willingness to reach across the aisle to deliver tangible results for the
middle class and our nation's economy. I believe Hillary Clinton is that
leader.”

*USA Today: “Clinton backs Philly's paid sick leave”
<http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015/02/14/clinton-backs-phillys-paid-sick-leave/>*

“On Thursday, the same day Philadelphia won the Democrats’ next
presidential nominating convention, Mayor Michael Nutter signed into law a
paid sick leave bill. And guess who likes it: Clinton tweeted her approval
today.”

*NBC News: “2016 Polls Show Clinton Leads in Key States, GOP Field Wide
Open”
<http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/2016-polls-show-clinton-leads-key-states-gop-field-wide-n306106>*

“By comparison, the Democratic nomination contest is much less competitive
in these three states. In Iowa, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
leads Vice President Joe Biden by more than 50 points, 68 percent to 12
percent.” ... "In hypothetical general-election matchups among registered
voters, Clinton leads both Bush and Walker in the battlegrounds of Iowa and
New Hampshire."

*The Hill: “Paul takes page from Clinton playbook”
<http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/232858-rand-paul-takes-page-from-clintons-playbook>*

“Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is adopting an old tactic of Hillary Clinton's,
making a habit of working across the aisle ahead of a presidential
election.”

*MSNBC: “Rand Paul mocks Hillary Clinton with parody Pinterest page”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/rand-paul-mocks-hillary-clinton-parody-pinterest-page>*

“The Kentucky senator tweeted out a link Saturday to a parody Pinterest
page that uses some tired anti-Hillary tropes to lampoon the potential
Democratic presidential nominee.”

*The Hill: “Boehner: Benghazi investigation not about Clinton 2016 bid”
<http://thehill.com/policy/international/232886-boehner-benghazi-investigation-not-about-clinton-2016-bid>*

“Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Sunday that Republican leaders are not
attempting to hurt Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential chances by
continuing to investigate the 2012 Benghazi attacks.”

*Associated Press: “Webb wants to get into 2016 race under 'right
circumstances'”
<http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_268798/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=Lao7p8ae>*

“Former Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia says he'd like to get into the race for
the Democratic nomination for president in 2016 ‘under the right
circumstances.’”

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Webb Says Money Is Chief
Dilemma in 2016 Bid”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/02/15/webb-says-money-is-chief-dilemma-in-2016-bid/>*

“Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, exploring a possible 2016 presidential
campaign, said he is in the process of deciding whether he can “put
together the type of money” needed and still remain independent of special
interests.”

*New York Times column: Maureen Dowd: “Call Off the Dogs”
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fmaureen-dowd&_r=0>*

“Just as Bill Clinton was able to forgive another architect of the vast
right-wing conspiracy, Richard Mellon Scaife, once Scaife was charmed by
Hillary in person and began giving money to the Clinton foundation, so,
too, was Bill won over by Brock’s book, ‘Blinded by the Right: The
Conscience of an Ex-Conservative,’ and Brock’s Media Matters and Correct
the Record websites, which ferociously push back against any Hillary
coverage that isn’t fawning.”

*DAVID BROCK RESPONDS, in email to Playbook: *"I've never worn a monocle.
Maureen must have me confused with Colonel Strasser from Casablanca."

*Articles:*

*Orlando Sentinel opinion: Rep. Patrick Murphy: “Hillary: A leader for the
middle class: My Word”
<http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-ed-hillary-clinton-my-word-20150213-story.html>*

By Rep. Patrick Murphy

February 15, 2015

The American economy is improving, but many Americans, particularly those
in the middle class, have yet to feel the recovery. In order to create
sustainable, long-term economic growth, we must invest in our
infrastructure, skilled labor and manufacturing, and education — and
promote policies that will help lift people out of poverty and into a
strong and growing middle class.

However, none of this will be possible if we cannot work together in
Congress — putting partisanship aside for the best interests of the
American people. This is, after all, what we were elected to do.

I made the focus of my first term ending the gridlock in Washington and
getting the country's fiscal house in order. These are key priorities for
the majority of Americans, but they are often thwarted by partisans in
Congress who would rather point fingers than create solutions for jobs and
the economy.

As the nation turns its eyes to 2016, we need leaders with a true
willingness to reach across the aisle to deliver tangible results for the
middle class and our nation's economy. I believe Hillary Clinton is that
leader.

Clinton has built a reputation as someone who can work across the aisle.
She has the record and experience necessary to lead on the issues that
matter most to our country. I know that she will put the priorities of the
middle class at the forefront and work toward economic growth and job
creation.

At the Children's Defense Fund, she worked to build bipartisan support to
pass many laws that have helped millions of kids.

As first lady, she experienced what it takes to work in a divided
government to pass legislation and grow the economy. Alongside her husband,
the Clintons created a decade of broad-based prosperity, balancing the
budget and creating millions of new jobs.

In the Senate, she worked across the aisle to expand alternative-energy
programs. She also teamed up with Republicans to deliver unemployment
benefits to millions of Americans. The New York Times called her record of
working across the aisle to support out-of-work Americans "a case study of
how legislative objectives trump ideology."

Clinton has said, "Don't support people who proudly say they don't believe
in compromise. That is a recipe for gridlock." In an increasingly divided
government, we will need a tested leader who believes in compromise and
putting the interests of the American people first. Should she choose to
run for president, I would support Hillary Clinton because she can be that
leader.

*USA Today: “Clinton backs Philly's paid sick leave”
<http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015/02/14/clinton-backs-phillys-paid-sick-leave/>*

By Martha Moore

February 14, 2015

Could this be a clue to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 platform? If there is one?

On Thursday, the same day Philadelphia won the Democrats’ next presidential
nominating convention, Mayor Michael Nutter signed into law a paid sick
leave bill. And guess who likes it: Clinton tweeted her approval today.

Other cities with paid sick leave laws include New York, Seattle, Portland,
Ore., and Oakland, Calif.

Clinton has already expressed support for state sick leave laws, which
currently exist in California, Connecticut and Massachusetts. “We need to
get paid leave provisions on every state ballot by 2016 that we can
possibly manage to do,” she said in a December speech at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women. When she was in the Senate, she backed a bill to
require paid sick leave for businesses that employ more than 15 workers.
Now President Obama is pushing for a federal paid sick leave law. He
mentioned it in his State of the Union address last month and a bill has
since been introduced in the House.

Clinton hasn’t had a heavy public schedule lately, and fundraising efforts
for her proto-campaign are meeting with tepid response, but she has been
edging into the public debate on some issues. On Thursday she teamed with
Republican Bill Frist, the former Senate Majority Leader, to write an op-ed
urging Congress to renew the Childrens Health Insurance Program. Earlier
this month, she poked Republicans who questioned mandatory vaccines with a
mildly mocking tweet: “The earth is round, the sky is blue and vaccines
work.”

*NBC News: “2016 Polls Show Clinton Leads in Key States, GOP Field Wide
Open”
<http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/2016-polls-show-clinton-leads-key-states-gop-field-wide-n306106>*

By Mark Murray

February 15, 2015, 9:01 a.m. EST

Less than a year before the first presidential contests begin, a trio of
new NBC News/Marist polls show that the Republican race is wide open in the
early nominating states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.

In fact, seven different possible Republican candidates get double-digit
support in at least one of the states. But only two candidates — former
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker — are in double
digits in all three states.

The early betting line for these critical states "points to a
rough-and-tumble Republican nomination battle," says pollster Lee
Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion.

In Iowa, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee leads the GOP pack getting
support from 17 percent of potential Republican caucus-goers, followed by
Bush at 16 percent, Walker at 15 percent, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie at
9 percent and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., at 7 percent.

In New Hampshire, Bush gets support from 18 percent of potential GOP
primary voters, followed by Walker at 15 percent, Paul at 14 percent and
Christie at 13 percent.

And in South Carolina, it's native son Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., at 17
percent, Bush at 15 percent, Walker at 12 percent, and Huckabee and retired
neurosurgeon Ben Carson tied at 10 percent.

Clinton holds a substantial lead in the early states

By comparison, the Democratic nomination contest is much less competitive
in these three states. In Iowa, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
leads Vice President Joe Biden by more than 50 points, 68 percent to 12
percent.

She's ahead of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., by the same margin in New
Hampshire, 69 percent to 13 percent.

And in South Carolina, Clinton has a 45-point advantage over Biden, 65
percent to 20 percent.

The NBC/Marist polls did not include Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in
these trial heats because she continues to insist — in both the present and
future tenses — that she won't be running for president in 2016.

All of the possible candidates that the polls measured either have formed
committees to explore a run, have begun to hire staff, or at least have
left open the possibility of a White House bid.

An early look at the general election

In hypothetical general-election matchups among registered voters, Clinton
leads both Bush and Walker in the battlegrounds of Iowa and New Hampshire.

In Iowa, Clinton holds an eight-point advantage over Bush, 48 percent to 40
percent, and an 11-point edge over Walker, 49 percent to 38 percent.

In New Hampshire, Clinton is up by six points over Bush (48 percent to 42
percent) and seven points over Walker (49 percent to 42 percent).

And in the GOP-leaning state of South Carolina, Bush leads Clinton by three
points, 48 percent to 45 percent. And Walker ties her at 46 percent each.

While Clinton is ahead in Iowa and New Hampshire, President Barack Obama
isn't much of an asset for her in these two states, with his job-approval
rating at 43 percent in both.

Obama's job rating is one point higher in South Carolina, at 44 percent.

Testing the most acceptable and least acceptable issues

The NBC/Marist polls also tested seven key issues — supporting Common Core,
supporting a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, wanting to
repeal the federal health-care law, believing that climate change is
man-made, opposing gay marriage, favoring raising taxes on the wealthy and
wanting to send more U.S. troops to combat ISIS — to see which were the
most acceptable and unacceptable to voters in these three states.

The most acceptable among all registered voters and Democrats: a candidate
who wants to raise taxes on the wealthy.

The least acceptable among all registered voters and Democrats: a candidate
who opposes same-sex marriage.

The most acceptable among Republican voters: a candidate who wants to
repeal the health-care law.

The least acceptable among Republicans: believing climate change is
man-made (in Iowa and South Carolina) and raising taxes on the wealthy (New
Hampshire).

The NBC/Marist of Iowa was conducted Feb. 3-10 of 891 registered voters
(margin of error of plus-minus 3.3 percentage points), 320 potential GOP
caucus-goers (plus-minus 5.5 percentage points) and 321 potential
Democratic caucus-goers (plus-minus 5.5 percentage points).

The NBC/Marist poll of New Hampshire was conducted Feb. 3-10 of 887
registered voters (margin of error of plus-minus 3.3 percentage points),
381 potential GOP primary voters (plus-minus 5.0 percentage points) and 309
potential Democratic primary voters (plus-minus 5.6 percentage points).

The NBC/Marist poll of South Carolina was conducted Feb. 3-10 of 877
registered voters (plus-minus 3.3 percentage points), 450 potential GOP
primary voters (plus-minus4 4.6 percentage points) and 352 potential
Democratic primary voters (plus-minus 5.2 percentage points).

*The Hill: “Paul takes page from Clinton playbook”
<http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/232858-rand-paul-takes-page-from-clintons-playbook>*

By Alexander Bolton

February 15, 2015, 6:00 a.m. EST

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is adopting an old tactic of Hillary Clinton's,
making a habit of working across the aisle ahead of a presidential election.

Paul, a likely presidential candidate in 2016, has sponsored bills with
Democratic colleagues on topics ranging from criminal justice reform to
fiscal oversight of the Pentagon, apparently in an effort to broaden his
appeal.

He could be helped in this regard by his overall worldview. Paul sees
interventionism overseas and government surveillance at home through a
skeptical lens, a position that is more common, overall, on the left than
the right.

Still, Paul is best known to many people as a leader of the 2010 Tea Party
revolution. Others recall that one of the first media firestorms he ignited
was centered on his complicated view of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Conspicuous teamwork with Democrats in Congress could help him appeal to
independents in next year’s primaries and in the general election.

This week, Paul introduced legislation with Senate Democratic Leader Harry
Reid (D-Nev.) to restore federal voting rights to non-violent offenders who
have been released from prison.

Last week, he unveiled a bill with Sen. Patrick Leahy (Vt.), the senior
Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, to give federal judges more discretion
to hand out sentences below the requirements of mandatory minimums.

Paul and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), one of the most liberal members of
the Democratic caucus, last month announced a proposal to extend the
Highway Trust Fund by giving companies a tax incentive to repatriate
overseas profits.

In her time in the Senate, Hillary Clinton sponsored an array of bipartisan
bills, with an eye on fashioning a pragmatic image after years of being
seen as a hyper-partisan figure.

In the summer of 2006, for example, she co-sponsored, with former Sen.
Robert Bennett (R-Utah), a proposed constitutional amendment to ban
desecration of the American flag that came within one vote of passing the
Senate.

And such efforts are not wholly confined to the past for Clinton, who is
preparing for another likely White House run in 2016.

Just this week, she joined forces with former Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist (R-Tenn.) to publish an op-ed in The New York Times urging Congress
to extend the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Political experts say Paul’s effort to defy ideological stereotypes could
pay off in next year’s primaries as well as in the general election.

“Paul wants to appeal to people who have low party identification,” said Al
Cross, a longtime Kentucky political columnist. “A lot of voters like
candidates who think outside the box and kind of cross party lines and get
something done.

“It’s mainly about the primary,” he added. “It’s more of a New Hampshire
strategy than anything else.”

In New Hampshire, independents make up more than 40 percent of the
electorate and they’re allowed to vote in either the Republican or the
Democratic primary.

Showing an ability to work across party lines could also help Paul pick up
Democratic votes in other important open-primary states such as Michigan
and South Carolina.

It’s not a unique approach, even among Republicans. New Jersey Gov. Chris
Christie (R), a centrist who might have trouble winning conservative votes,
has made a point of visiting almost every state with an open primary.

Paul has a solid base among Tea Party conservatives and libertarians thanks
to his father, former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), who ran for president three
times — once on the Libertarian ticket and twice as a libertarian-leaning
Republican.

But merely replicating his father’s showings would leave the Kentucky
senator a long way short of the presidency.

“It looks to me as if he’s trying to position himself to go a step beyond
where his father was. His father, whom I know and like, spent much of his
life trying to build a libertarian movement but never really in my view
contemplated becoming president,” said Vin Weber, a Republican strategist
who served as a senior advisor to Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign.

Paul is making an argument about his electability in a general election by
portraying himself as a conservative who can win over voters in the middle
and even pick off members of core Democratic constituencies, such as
African Americans.

“We need a bigger party,” Paul told a group of Republicans in South
Carolina last year. “We need to reach out to people where they are. We need
to be more diverse and look more like the American people. The message has
to be broadened to reach more people.”

“If you look at the field, there are a lot of people vying for the base or
the Tea Party end of the party without thinking about the middle. He’s
thinking beyond the primary,” said Jennifer Duffy, senior editor at The
Cook Political Report.

“He needs to sort of fix the reputation he brought to the Senate,” she
added. “He was [thought of as] very extreme, that he was a Tea Party guy.

“What Paul really wants to be is a guy who’s not easily defined,” she added.

Paul suggested in several 2010 interviews that the 1964 Civil Rights Act
went too far in prohibiting private businesses from using racially
discriminatory practices, even though he personally condemned such conduct.

He also said at the time that he would have voted for the law and has
contested any attempt to describe him as an opponent as a
“mischaracterization.”

Paul has since made a direct appeal to African-American voters by
sponsoring a handful of bills aimed at criminal justice reform.

He and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) have co-sponsored legislation that would
help adults seal non-violent criminal records and automatically expunge the
records of juvenile offenders who commit non-violent crimes before turning
15.

“It’s particularly smart because of the strict libertarian position with
[regard] to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. If he became identified with that
point of view, which has surfaced every now and then, that’s death in more
places than in just the African American [community],” Weber said.

Paul and Sen. Angus King (Maine), an independent who caucuses with
Democrats, both support the FAIR Act, which would protect citizens from
police seizures of property without due process of law. Paul argues asset
forfeiture laws hit minorities disproportionately.

Last month, he and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced legislation calling
for an audit of the Pentagon. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another 2016
hopeful, also co-sponsored the measure.

*MSNBC: “Rand Paul mocks Hillary Clinton with parody Pinterest page”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/rand-paul-mocks-hillary-clinton-parody-pinterest-page>*

By Zachary Roth

February 14, 2015, 4:43 p.m. EST

In honor of Valentine’s Day, Sen. Rand Paul is having some pointed fun at
Hillary Clinton’s expense.

The Kentucky senator tweeted out a link Saturday to a parody Pinterest page
that uses some tired anti-Hillary tropes to lampoon the potential
Democratic presidential nominee.

“Hillary Clinton’s new Valentine’s Day Pinterest board is worth a look,”
wrote Paul. “Check it out and please RT!”

The Pinterest page, which uses the same profile image as Clinton’s genuine
Twitter account, includes pictures on themes that figure to be prominent
Republican attack lines should Clinton pursue the 2016 Democratic
nomination for president: among them Clinton’s ties to President Obama;
anxiety over the prospect of Bill Clinton’s return to the White House; and
of course, Benghazi.

The stunt may seem light-hearted, but it has a serious intent: to bolster
Paul’s brand as a tech-savvy Republican who can appeal to young voters; to
keep him in the spotlight as other potential GOP candidates like Jeb Bush
and Scott Walker threaten to eclipse him; and to court conservatives by
going after a perennial favorite target of the right.

It isn’t the first time Paul has taken to social media to mock the former
first lady. After last November’s midterms, he sent out a series of tweets
that used the hashtag #HillarysLosers and showed pictures of Clinton
appearing with Democratic Senate candidates who’d just been defeated.

A spokesman for Paul didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on
the Pinterest page.

*The Hill: “Boehner: Benghazi investigation not about Clinton 2016 bid”
<http://thehill.com/policy/international/232886-boehner-benghazi-investigation-not-about-clinton-2016-bid>*

By Keith Laing

February 15, 2015, 11:43 a.m. EST

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Sunday that Republican leaders are not
attempting to hurt Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential chances by
continuing to investigate the 2012 Benghazi attacks.

“The idea here is to get the American people the facts about what
happened,” Boehner said during an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

“Why wasn’t the security for our embassy in Libya given to our ambassador
after repeated requests the night of the event,” Boehner continued. “Why
didn’t we attempt to rescue the people that were there? Why were the people
there told not to get involved?

“And then, as importantly, when did the president know this and why for
some two weeks did he describe it differently than what it really was?” he
added

Democrats have accused Republicans of trying to score political points by
continuing to focus on the 2012 Benghazi attacks, which resulted in the
deaths of four U.S. citizens, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Clinton, who is widely seen as the likely frontrunner for the 2016
Democratic presidential nominee, was still serving as secretary of State at
the time of the Benghazi attack.

Boehner said Sunday that there are still questions that need to be answered
about the Obama administration’s handling of the 2012 attacks, even as he
denied the investigations were an attempt to harm Clinton’s presumed
presidential campaign.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions,” he said. “[Rep.] Trey Gowdy
[R-S.C.], the chairman of the Benghazi Committee, has been told by me I
don’t need a big show here. What we need are facts. The American people
deserve the truth about what happened and that’s all we’re interested in.”

Boehner said Clinton may be called to testify before Congress about
Benghazi this year even if she runs for president.

“She was never interviewed by the Accountability Review Board shortly after
the event,” he said. “I think that we just need to know what the facts were
and if she’s got facts that she can supply, we need to know them.”

Boehner said the final decision about whether Clinton will be called to
testify is “up to Chairman Gowdy. “If he believes that necessary to get to
the truth, so be it,” Boehner said.

*Associated Press: “Webb wants to get into 2016 race under 'right
circumstances'”
<http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_268798/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=Lao7p8ae>*

[No Writer Mentioned]

February 15, 2015

WASHINGTON (AP) - Former Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia says he'd like to get
into the race for the Democratic nomination for president in 2016 "under
the right circumstances."

The Vietnam War veteran and Navy secretary under President Ronald Reagan
was asked during a C-SPAN appearance Sunday about his timeline, and he
answered: "I will know it when I see it."

Webb already has announced a presidential exploratory committee.

Webb says "we're out talking to people" and the goal is to see if a
campaign would be "viable" and could be funded in a way so he could make it
into candidate debates.

If the answers are "yes," Webb says he'll move forward, and "if not, we
won't."

*Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Webb Says Money Is Chief
Dilemma in 2016 Bid”
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/02/15/webb-says-money-is-chief-dilemma-in-2016-bid/>*

By Thomas M. Burton

February 15, 2015, 11:52 a.m. EST

Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, exploring a possible 2016 presidential
campaign, said he is in the process of deciding whether he can “put
together the type of money” needed and still remain independent of special
interests.

Mr. Webb, a Democrat, said his chief political dilemma is building a
realistic campaign without becoming beholden to donors in an era where the
Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has allowed individual donors to
give millions to support campaigns.

Appearing on Washington Journal on C-Span, Mr. Webb said nowadays, “someone
can write an individual check for $26 million” and a candidate such as
former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush can seek to raise $100 million within three
months. Against that backdrop, the former Virginia senator said he is
evaluating whether a campaign will be possible for him.

Mr. Webb, who formed an exploratory committee in November, will be a
speaker at a state event in Iowa in April, a potential forum for him to
make the case that he is a viable alternative to Hillary Clinton for the
party’s nomination.

Mr. Webb, who served in the Senate from 2007 to 2013, cast his possible
campaign as one that would be aimed at leveling the economic playing field
between millions of Americans with flat or declining salaries, and the very
wealthy amassing “money that’s being made on passive income” such as stock
dividends and capital gains. Acknowledging that he himself makes money on
stocks, he voiced the concern that “people are getting separated” and
actually getting further apart financially.

A onetime combat Marine in Vietnam and a graduate of the U.S. Naval
Academy, Mr. Webb repeated his concerns about how President Barack Obama
has used military force. Addressing the recent history in Libya, he said
the “real story on Libya is, when can a president unilaterally use military
force” if no treaties compel the U.S. to do so?

“The doctrine of when we use military force has become very vague,” he said.

*New York Times column: Maureen Dowd: “Call Off the Dogs”
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fmaureen-dowd&_r=0>*

By Maureen Dowd

February 14, 2015

WASHINGTON — I’LL pay for this column.

The Rottweilers will be unleashed.

Once the Clintons had a War Room. Now they have a Slime Room.

Once they had the sly James Carville, fondly known as “serpenthead.” Now
they have the slippery David Brock, accurately known as a snake.

Brock fits into the Clinton tradition of opportunistic knife-fighters like
Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

The silver-haired 52-year-old, who sports colorful designer suits and once
wore a monocle, brawled his way into a Times article about the uneasy
marriage between Hillary Clinton’s veteran attack dogs and the group of
advisers who are moving over from Obamaland.

Hillary hasn’t announced a 2016 campaign yet. She’s busy polling more than
200 policy experts on how to show that she really cares about the poor
while courting the banks. Yet her shadow campaign is already in a
déjà-vu-all-over-again shark fight over control of the candidate and her
money. It’s the same old story: The killer organization that, even with all
its ruthless hired guns, can’t quite shoot straight.

Squabbling competing factions helped Hillary squander a
quarter-of-a-billion dollars in 2008.

As Nicholas Confessore and Amy Chozick chronicled, the nasty dispute
spilled into public and Brock resigned last week from the board of a
pro-Clinton “super-PAC” called Priorities USA Action — whose co-chairman is
Jim Messina, Obama’s 2012 campaign manager — accusing the political action
committee of “an orchestrated political hit job” and “the kind of dirty
trick I’ve witnessed in the right-wing and would not tolerate then.”

He should know.

The former “right-wing hit man,” and impresario of “dirty tricks,” as Brock
has said of himself, made his living in the ’90s sliming Anita Hill as “a
little bit nutty and a little bit slutty” and breaking the Troopergate
story, which accused Arkansas state troopers of setting up liaisons for
Bill Clinton and spurred Paula Jones’s 1994 sexual harassment lawsuit.

He has tried to discredit anyone who disagreed with his ideological hits
(myself and reporters I know included). And that’s still the business he’s
in, simply on the other side as a Hillary zealot. (His conversion began in
1996 when he published a biography of Hillary that was not a total hit job
and that began the thaw.)

Just as Bill Clinton was able to forgive another architect of the vast
right-wing conspiracy, Richard Mellon Scaife, once Scaife was charmed by
Hillary in person and began giving money to the Clinton foundation, so,
too, was Bill won over by Brock’s book, “Blinded by the Right: The
Conscience of an Ex-Conservative,” and Brock’s Media Matters and Correct
the Record websites, which ferociously push back against any Hillary
coverage that isn’t fawning.

With the understood blessing of the Clintons, Brock runs a $28 million
cluster of media monitoring groups and oppo research organizations that are
vehicles to rebut and at times discredit and threaten anyone who casts a
gimlet eye at Clinton Inc.

As Confessore and Chozick wrote, he uses a fund-raiser named Mary Pat
Bonner, whose firm has collected millions of dollars in commissions — a
practice many fund-raising experts consider unethical.

Everyone wants to be at the trough for this one because Hillary is likely
to raise, and more important, spend more than $1 billion on her campaign.

The Clinton crowd is trying to woo Brock back into the fold because he’s
good at getting money and knows how their enemies think. The Clintons
appreciate the fact that Brock, like Morris, is a take-no-prisoners type
with the ethical compass of a jackal. Baked in the tactics of the right,
Brock will never believe that negative coverage results from legitimate
shortcomings. Instead, it’s all personal, all false, and all a war.

This is a bad harbinger for those who had hoped that Hillary would “kill
off the wild dogs,” as one Obama loyalist put it, and Bill would leave
behind the sketchy hangers-on in the mold of Ron Burkle and Jeffrey Epstein.

Hillary’s inability to dispense with brass-knuckle, fanatical acolytes like
Brock shows that she still has an insecure streak that requires Borgia-like
blind loyalty, and can’t distinguish between the real vast right-wing
conspiracy and the voices of legitimate concern.

Money-grubbing is always the ugly place with the Clintons, who have
devoured $2.1 billion in contributions since 1992 to their political
campaigns, family foundation and philanthropies, according to The Old
(Good) New Republic.

David Axelrod, the author of a new memoir, “Believer,” wrote that Hillary’s
past gurus, Morris and Penn, were nonbelievers — mercenary, manipulative
and avaricious. He told Politico’s Glenn Thrush that he would have advised
Hillary not to cash in with her book and six-figure speeches.

Axelrod reiterated to me that Hillary’s designated campaign chairman, John
Podesta, Bill Clinton’s last chief of staff who left his post as an Obama
counselor on Friday, “has the strength and standing to enforce a kind of
campaign discipline that hasn’t existed before.”

But, for now, what Republicans say about government is true of the
Clintons: They really do believe that your money belongs to them.

Someday, they should give their tin cup to the Smithsonian. It’s one of the
wonders of the world.

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  February 24 – Santa Clara, CA: Sec. Clinton to Keynote Address at
Inaugural Watermark Conference for Women (PR Newswire
<http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillary-rodham-clinton-to-deliver-keynote-address-at-inaugural-watermark-conference-for-women-283200361.html>
)

·  March 3 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton honored by EMILY’s List (AP
<http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_268798/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=SUjRlg8K>)

·  March 4 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton to fundraise for the Clinton
Foundation (WSJ
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/01/15/carole-king-hillary-clinton-live-top-tickets-100000/>
)

·  March 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton to keynote Irish American Hall of
Fame (NYT <https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/562349766731108352>)

·  March 19 – Atlantic City, NJ: Sec. Clinton keynotes American Camp
Association conference (PR Newswire <http://www.sys-con.com/node/3254649>)

·  March 23 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton to keynote award ceremony for
the Toner Prize for Excellence in Political Reporting (Syracuse
<http://newhouse.syr.edu/news-events/news/former-secretary-state-hillary-rodham-clinton-deliver-keynote-newhouse-school-s>
)