Subject: Re: Summary of Call with Mac Toler
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
Cc: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Heather Samuelson <[email-masked]>, "Turner, Katherine" <[email-masked]>, David Kendall <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:03:16 -0400

I think we get tic - we are asking for 100 but Phil said they likely will only give us 50

cdm

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 7:20 PM, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> CDM, as we discussed, this list seems right to me.
> I am curious if anyone has seen the breakout room? i think 15 is a
> good number to give them but practically dont think we should expand
> this core list. esp if this is the space HRC comes to escape during
> her breaks.
> also USSS will need to coordinate with Capitol hill security. i want
> to know in advance if they are going to fight with us about HRC going
> through a mag. Usss can reach out directly unless Mac wants to be the
> go between. They would also keep her motorcade on the grounds.
> lastly, i assume we are not getting tickets but that they would have
> reserved signs for HRC?
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Folks
>> 
>> Here is my take on the answers to the questions below - John/Huma/Jake - can
>> you provide any suggested changes or updates.
>> 
>> See below.
>> 
>> best.
>> 
>> cdm
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Turner, Katherine <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:21 PM
>> Subject: Summary of Call with Mac Toler
>> To: "Kendall, David" <[email-masked]>, Cheryl Mills
>> <[email-masked]>, Heather Samuelson <[email-masked]>,
>> "Saharia, Amy" <[email-masked]>
>> 
>> 
>> I had a call with Mac Toler this morning.  Mac works for the majority on the
>> Committee, and wears two hats:  he is both an attorney and the Committee’s
>> “security manager.”  He has requested from us the following:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 1.       Highest priority, as soon as possible:  a list of any individuals
>> who would want to be in the SCIF, in the event that a SCIF session is
>> necessary, so that they can confirm clearances with DOS.  Notably, on this
>> point, he said “This is just Mac speaking, so take this with a grain of
>> salt, but I don’t think we want to go into a classified session” because of
>> the logistical hurdles, but said they need to plan for that contingency in
>> case HRC requests the need to go into classified session in order to answer
>> a question, or another member asks a question that requires such an answer.
>> I asked what the highest level of classified info at issue would be; he
>> believed we should plan for up to TS/SCI, and confirmed that in a follow-up
>> email.
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> Katherine
>> 
>> Heather
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2.       The number of people (preferably a list with names) who are on what
>> he called the “Clinton Team” who will need to be seated in the row behind
>> her.
>> 
>> I would rather give number [7] vice names
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> Katherine
>> 
>> Heather
>> 
>> [Cheryl]*
>> 
>> Phil S
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> Connelly
>> 
>> *Note - I plan to be in hold room if my preference prevails
>> 
>> 3.       The number of people (if any) who plan to stay in the break-out
>> room (as opposed to needing a seat in the hearing room).
>> 
>> My preference is to give number - 15
>> 
>> In terms of who actually are must-shows if they can come:
>> 
>> John P
>> 
>> Jen P
>> 
>> Brian F
>> 
>> PIR
>> 
>> Jake
>> 
>> Huma
>> 
>> Phil B
>> 
>> Mike S
>> 
>> Amy S (W&C)
>> 
>> 
>> 4.       The number of guest passes we are requesting for seating in the
>> general audience.
>> 
>> 100
>> 
>> 5.       Any logistical requests we might have (e.g., with respect to
>> parking spaces).
>> 
>> 4 parking spots
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Katherine Turner
>> 
>> Williams & Connolly LLP
>> 
>> 725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
>> 
>> (P) 202-434-5487 | (F) 202-434-5029
>> 
>> [email-masked] | www.wc.com/kturner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may
>> contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you have
>> received this message in error, please do not read, use, copy, distribute,
>> or disclose the contents of the message and any attachments. Instead, please
>> delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender immediately.
>> Thank you.
>>