Subject: Re: Politica Point
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:12:56 -0400

of course - but then they wouldn't be the press - they would be rationale
beings assessing all angles - not just the news saleable one

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
wrote:

>  I think they're quite right about the intellectual challenges facing a
> potential campaign. And that's largely what we're now trying to prepare
> for. But I also think they're wrong to expect answers to their questions
> before there even is a campaign.
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>
>  The Clinton Brand of 2014 is missing three key elements that vaulted
> Bill Clinton to power in 1992. First was new ideas. Second was an authentic
> populist connection. Third was the idea of generational change.
>
>
>
> http://www.politico.com/story/2014/10/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-elections-111528.html#ixzz3EzNzOz2k
>
>