Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Doug Band <[email-masked]>, "Justin G. Cooper" <[email-masked]>, Terry McAuliffe <[email-masked]>
Cc: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:21:18 -0500

All:

Attached is the revised memo - please advise if any comments by Sunday am.

thanks

cdm

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:21 PM, John Podesta <[email-masked]>wrote:

> I'm good with this.
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Doug Band <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> > Are we doing this at 4? I have a 5pm mtg that can't be moved
> > Terry should also join
> >
> > From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 01:18 PM
> > To: Doug Band
> > Cc: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; Justin Cooper
> > Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model
> >
> > I can do 4-5pm.
> >
> > cdm
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Doug Band <[email-masked]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Agreed
> >>
> >> A call friday afternoon?
> >> I can do anytime from 230 to 530
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: John Podesta [mailto:[email-masked]]
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 08:34 AM
> >> To: Doug Band
> >> Cc: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; Justin Cooper
> >> Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model
> >>
> >> See you on return. We should try to button this up when you two are
> back.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Doug Band <[email-masked]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Justin and I are both going to the me
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: John Podesta [mailto:[email-masked]]
> >> > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 04:12 PM
> >> > To: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
> >> > Cc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
> >> > Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model
> >> >
> >> > Doug,
> >> > Are you going to the middle east? If not, want to do this in DC first
> >> > of the week? Cheryl, you back?
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Revised/Updated Memo attached.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Doug Band <[email-masked]
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Let's do a call and discuss this
> >> >>> Document is mostly fine with a few
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Late last night, laura graham called me as she couldn't reach my
> >> >>> brother
> >> >>> or her shrink. She was on staten island in her car parked a few feet
> >> >>> from
> >> >>> the waters edge with her foot on the gas pedal and the car in park.
> >> >>> She
> >> >>> called me to tell me the stress of all of this office crap with wjc
> >> >>> and cvc
> >> >>> as well as that of her family had driven her to the edge and she
> >> >>> couldn't
> >> >>> take it anymore. I spent a while on the phone with her preventing
> her
> >> >>> from
> >> >>> doing that, as I have a few times in the past few months, and was
> able
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> reach roger and her shrink.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Bruce said the stress of specifically the office had caused his very
> >> >>> serious health issues as you both know.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But I'm sure chelsea is more concerned with a mostly false story in
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> distinguished ny post about mf global and teneo not her role in what
> >> >>> happened to laura/bruce, what she is doing to the organization or
> the
> >> >>> several of stories that have appeared in the ny post about her
> father
> >> >>> and a
> >> >>> multitude of women over the years.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For teneo, well before mf global, we have been discussing this. Its
> >> >>> going
> >> >>> to hurt teneo to have wjc on the adv bd any longer but we need come
> up
> >> >>> with
> >> >>> a reorg concept for the relationship with wjc and teneo that is
> lower
> >> >>> key
> >> >>> and handled privately and properly that we should discuss
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Life is to short so let's have a call and get this over with
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email-masked]]
> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 04:38 PM
> >> >>> To: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
> >> >>> Cc: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
> >> >>> Subject: Draft Infrastructure Model
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Doug/Justin (and John):
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Not sure where things stand in terms of folks feelings and
> willingness
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> engage with WJC -- attached is a revised model memo based upon
> >> >>> offering one
> >> >>> option and outlining the creation of a personal office paid for by
> WJC
> >> >>> 100%
> >> >>> which acts as the interlocutor for his time regarding engagement
> with
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> various entities and serve as advisors to him regarding what and how
> >> >>> he does
> >> >>> things.  Each separate entity then would operate independently and
> >> >>> would
> >> >>> engage the leadership of the personal office - a designated CEO or
> COS
> >> >>> who
> >> >>> b/cs in effect what Doug and Justin have been de facto -- the
> arbiter
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> decision-maker.  That person would have the benefit (if you two
> >> >>> choose) of
> >> >>> Doug and Justin's best advice as consultants but ultimately would be
> >> >>> accountable for ensuring that the implementation of the President's
> >> >>> will
> >> >>> occurs in the various entities and the various entities would
> operate
> >> >>> according to the time and engagement and direction as necessary as
> the
> >> >>> President gives.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> See what you think.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This model would mean that all non-Foundation entities would no
> longer
> >> >>> be
> >> >>> co-located with Foundation; that folks would be on a single payroll
> -
> >> >>> Foundation or personal.  Whatever rules the Foundation creates for
> >> >>> folks
> >> >>> being able to earn outside income would apply equally (so e.g., if
> >> >>> Bari is
> >> >>> on the Foundation payroll and Dorvir; and Ami is on Teno and  the
> >> >>> Foundation
> >> >>> -- whatever rules there are for outside income would apply equally
> to
> >> >>> both
> >> >>> of them as Foundation employees -- namely, if rule becomes no
> outside
> >> >>> income, then both have to stop doing anything except Foundation to
> >> >>> stay on
> >> >>> Foundation payroll; if rule is you can earn outside income as long
> as
> >> >>> it is
> >> >>> disclosed and approved by the Board, that becomes the applicable
> rule;
> >> >>> etc.
> >> >>> - you get the pix).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It's easiest for me if folks sent actual edits or comments in
> writing
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> can be implemented -- otherwise this exercise b/cs one of feeling in
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> dark for me.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am happy to do a call on Thursday or Friday if that works too.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> best.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> cdm
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >
> >
>