Subject: Re: CONFIRMED Follow - up Call, Sunday, October 26, 9:30am EDT - PRE-CALL
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Robby Mook <[email-masked]>
Cc: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Joanne Laszczych <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:05:50 -0400

i read it as not needing the meeting

so going to not do meeting but call you on saturday

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:46 PM, <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Sorry I just saw the typo in my email so maybe it was misleading.  I was
> saying I don't think we need MORE than 30 minutes.  (Not sure if that was
> interpreted as we don't need the time at all). I definitely think we need
> to talk about post Eday schedule as soon as possible.  That can be with her
> but I wonder if it's better for the three of us to get on the same page
> first.  I just don't know where her mind is right now so you guys would be
> better to determine what's best to propose.
> On the digital piece I hope to have a memo for her tomorrow pm but I'm a
> bit skeptical it will arrive on time.  We have him working on a ton of
> stuff for no money so I've been trying to cut him a little slack but I'll
> check in again now.
> Happy to talk sat.  I'm completely off the grid 8am-12pm and then have
> calls after that but can jump off.  What time are you thinking?  I will
> just make sure I'm open.
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> That was the purpose I had - follow up on digital and any other matters.
>
> But for clarity - No pre-meeting Sunday.
>
> I will call you Saturday when I land in DC.
>
> Best
>
> cdm
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:07 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
>
> Agree--what I feel is needed on my end is for the three of us to talk
> about the timeline and next steps with her per that timeline I sent.
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 6:53 AM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> If we don't need the time, let's not do if.
>
> Will call you on Saturday.
>
> Best.
>
> cdm
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 5:03 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
>
> I don't necessarily think we need not time I was just curious on agenda.
> Teddy told me his memo would be done by the end of this week so hopefully
> we have that to her by then (although I'm worried that realistically means
> Monday).   Otherwise do you want me to give an update on the site?
> Should we discuss the timeline I sent?
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:34 AM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> I thought digital and follow-up but can do other stuff - but tell me how
> much more time we need than 30 mins
>
> cdm
>
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 7:22 PM, [email-masked] wrote:
>
> Sure thing.   Is this on digital specifically or overall stuff?
>
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Robby/John
>
> Are you free to follow-up on the call with HRC for 30 minutes on Sunday at
> 9am.  I committ to get us done by 10am so it still will be only an hour of
> your time.
>
> best.
>
> cdm
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joanne Laszczych <[email-masked]>
> Date: Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:19 AM
> Subject: CONFIRMED Follow - up Call, Sunday, October 26, 9:30am EDT
> To: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <
> [email-masked]>
> Cc: Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>, Nicholas S Merrill <
> [email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Robby
> Mook <[email-masked]>
>
>
> Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26.
>
> Please use:
>
> Dial i: 1-530-881-1000
> Code:   742374#
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AM
> To: Jake Sullivan
> Cc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; Joanne
> Laszczych
> Subject: Re: Follow - up Call
>
> Does 930am work better for folks then?
>
> cdm
>
> > On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speak
> then)
> >
> >> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> Can you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a follow up
> call?
> >>
> >> Best.
> >>
> >> cdm
>
>