Subject: Fwd: Favor . . .
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:56:44 -0500

fysa
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: Favor . . .
To: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>

Cheryl: what I sent around was hardly worth it. I had to do it for a speech
so I repackaged it.
As for the campaign, I will send you something by 7:00a.m. Or so on
wednesday. If you have not heard from me. Buzz me.
I think that it will be the fastest, most complete top line overview that
you will find that morning.
There will be a ton of more in-depth analysis but this should give you a
tree top baseline.
After its over, let me know what else you need.
Basically, 2014 means virtually nothing about 2016 except that people are
tired of obama and want a change. There will be a lot of breathless
analysis on how the dems war on women backfired.
It will be the 4th change election in 5 cycles.
D
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
------------------------------
*From: * Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
*Date: *Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:17:47 -0500
*To: *Doug Sosnik<[email-masked]>
*Subject: *Favor . . .

got it.

can i also ask you a favor?

I got forwarded a copy of your election memo (yes - that is my way of
saying I have been dropped from the list).

would you do a memo I could share with HRC with your take on

a. What happened structurally in 2014 vis a vis turnout and levels of
support among different demographics?

b. How was 2014 similar or different from 2010?

c. What should takeaways for 2016 generally be: what are the right lessons?
 what are the wrong lessons?

cdm

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Sosnik, Doug <[email-masked]> wrote:

>
>