Subject: Fwd: NYT inquiry?
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
Cc: Heather Samuelson <[email-masked]>, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:59:25 -0500

Robby/JP/HA

FYSA below.  Happy to discuss when we talk tomorrow.

best.

cdm
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kendall, David <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: NYT inquiry?
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "
[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>

His main focus was trying to persuade me to give him copies of the HRC
emails State has recently produced to the Committee "so that the NYT can
fairly and credibly analyze and report on them authoritatively  and thereby
take the spin out of any false leaks or assertions by the
Benghazi Committee majority.". He knew that some of the HRC dox had been
produced--wasn't sure if they all had been.  He knew that State had asked
other former SOS's for their emails but didn't know what the response was.
I couldn't tell what his likely angle was (and even if he had one).

----- Original Message -----
From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:00 AM
To: Kendall, David
Subject: Re: NYT inquiry?

Got it - any angle he was pursuing?

cdm

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:12 PM, "Kendall, David" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Talked to Heather late afternoon aand told her I'd heard from Dem Staff
Director on Benghazi Select Comm that NYT was sniffing around, maybe to do
a story on State production to Committee or on our production to State.
I'd gotten a call from NYT's Mike Schmidt (very young) about 2:00 pm--said
nothing on background or on record.  I didn't feel he had anything, but. We
may get a further inquiry from him over weekend.
>
> ________________________________
>
> NOTICE:
>
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication
> in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone
> (call us collect at (202) 434-5000) and immediately delete this message
> and all its attachments.