Subject: Re: Call @ 9:30pm
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>
Cc: Jennifer Palmier I <[email-masked]>, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Jim Margolis <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 21:32:17 -0500

i can't get into the call - it is saying pin is not correct

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]> wrote:

>  We're on hold with any paper going out tonight, and we need to reconvene
> @ *9:30pm. *
>
>  Robby I'm volunteering your #: *(202) 765-0457 x 55421
> <%28202%29%20765-0457%20x%2055421>#*
>
>
>      *From: *Philippe Reines
> *Sent: *Saturday, March 7, 2015 5:09 PM
> *To: *Jennifer Palmier I; Joel Benenson; Mandy Grunwald;
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Jim Margolis;
> [email-masked]; Nick Merrill; Huma Abedin;
> [email-masked]; John Anzalone; [email-masked]
> *Cc: [email-masked]
> *Subject: *Statement
>
>   For everyone's awareness on timing, we won't have approval on the
> statement or q&a before 6pm at earliest, *after* she is off stage. But at
> least it will get done tonight.
> As for updated q&a it's being reviewed, will try to circulate it for
> feedback soon but once it passes muster there might not be much wiggle
> room. But we tried to incorporate everyone's feedback from the call, and
> will not hit send before you all can see it and have the chance to flag any
> glaring problems.
>
>
>   From: Jennifer Palmieri
> Date: Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 4:52 PM
> To: PIR
> Cc: Jennifer Palmieri, Joel Benenson, Mandy Grunwald, "
> [email-masked]", Heather Samuelson, CDM, Jim Margolis, "
> [email-masked]", Nick Merrill, Huma Abedin, "
> [email-masked]", "[email-masked]", John Anzalone
> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT
>
>   Roger that.  Thank you
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>    We are getting her approval. I will be crystal clear when there is a
> final and for safety Heather or I will send the final clearly marked as
> such.
>
>
>   From: Jennifer Palmieri
> Date: Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 4:46 PM
> To: Joel Benenson
> Cc: Mandy Grunwald, "[email-masked]", Heather Samuelson, CDM,
> Jim Margolis, Jennifer Palmieri, "[email-masked]", Nick
> Merrill, Huma Abedin, "[email-masked]", PIR, "[email-masked]",
> John Anzalone
> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT
>
>   Do we consider this statement final?
>
>  Does that mean we are good to go or are we making changes to the q and
> a?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>   I'm good with these edits.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>  Comments from Margolis and me are tracked in the attached.
>
>  We have a couple minor language edits.  Our big suggestion is to cut the
> "bemused" paragraph about HRC's relationship to technology.  This seems
> more appropriate for HRC to say in person than on paper.  Additionally,
> we worry that the word "bemused" will drive "this is no laughing matter"
> reactions.
>
>  thanks
>
>  *Mandy Grunwald*
> *Grunwald Communications*
> *202 973-9400 <202%20973-9400>*
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robby Mook <[email-masked]>
> To: Heather Samuelson <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>; jim.margolis <
> [email-masked]>; Jennifer Palmier I <[email-masked]>;
> Kristina Schake <[email-masked]>; Nick Merrill <
> [email-masked]>; Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>; john.podesta <
> [email-masked]>; Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>; Turner,
> Katherine <[email-masked]>; Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>; Mandy
> Grunwald <[email-masked]>; John Anzalone <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Sat, Mar 7, 2015 2:04 pm
> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT
>
>  My edits attached.  The one thing in here I feel strongly about is that
> she NOT include the part about meeting with other former secretaries and
> that they told her she should do this.  I recognize that the boss will have
> to approve, but if she wants to include that, I'd say we should discuss
> with her.  I worry it opens a major can of worms and deflects the heat in a
> potentially unhelpful way.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Heather Samuelson <
> [email-masked]> wrote:
>
>>  All:
>>
>>  Per our call today, attached is the DRAFT statement.
>>
>>  As a reminder, this is a DRAFT and should not be circulated.
>>
>>  Please note that Katherine Turner from David Kendallâ EURO (tm)s office is
>> copied on here, and she and/or David should be copied on all future
>> communications.
>>
>>  Let us know your thoughts.
>>
>>  Best.
>>  Heather
>>
>
>     <2015-03-07 Draft statement - updated - REM.MG.JM Edits.docx>
>
>
>
>