Subject: Re: Tomorrow | Gowdy
From: Cheryl Mills <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Cc: Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>, Heather Samuelson <[email-masked]>, Kristina Schake <[email-masked]>, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:23:39 -0400

no additional comments - though I do think we are kicking it up again and
don't know how not to get to that place

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:33 PM, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> I'd flip the last two clauses.
> On Mar 26, 2015 7:28 PM, "Nick Merrill" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>>  Can everyone take a look at this and provide thoughts on what our on
>> the record response will be tomorrow?  Note that our language has changed
>> notably from what I sent around last week in 2 places.  One is at the end
>> of the first sentence in an effort to make clear that these emails have all
>> been turned over and put the onus for whatever the expansion of the request
>> is on State, and secondly a mention of her being ready and willing to come
>> testify.
>>
>>  "Secretary Clinton has already turned all of her work emails over to
>> the State Department, and the Department has been responsive to the
>> committee, and will continue to be.  Representatives of Secretary Clinton's
>> office have been in touch with the committee to make clear that we want to
>> make everything public, that she's ready and willing to come and appear
>> herself, and we call on the committee to do so as soon as possible."
>>
>