Subject: RE: Draft email to NYT
From: Christina Reynolds <[email-masked]>
To: Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:48:38 -0400

Looks good to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Palmieri [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 7:47 PM
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>; John Podesta
<[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Subject: Draft email to NYT

John  and  Z - Andy Rosenthal said that our letter was too long and would
need to be changed to run as "letter to the editor."  This is my proposed
response to pull the plug and say we are going to go elsewhere.  Can you
give a look see?

Thank you for getting back to me.

I know our letter would be unusual for a "letter to the editor."  To be
clear. we assumed the letter would be posted online because of the length;
understood that it was not suitable for the editorial page.
But the text of the letter, is the text of the letter.  I understand the
Times may not want to publish the whole letter, but I don't think it is a
good idea for us to start editing it either. So if you all decide you cannot
run the full piece, I understand.  We will let you and Dean know if we
decide to publish the letter elsewhere.

Thanks for your consideration,

Jennifer

Sent from my iPhone