Subject: Re: Leaks
From: "Christopher Edley" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:18:33 -0700

Misunderstanding. Yes email to board, but maybe not a dozen others?

The real issue is the agemcy review teams.

Be well.

On 10/18/08, [email-masked] <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Chris,
> I'm fine with that. Did not expect these docs to shared with agency teams. I
> don't see an alternative to electronic distribution to Board. Fedex
> distribution seems impractical given the time constraints. That means that
> Board members will not have a chance to review the docs before our Friday
> meeting. That may be ok, but it will mean more of Friday will be spent
> reading out which I thought you thought was unproductive.
> John
> ------Original Message------
> From: Chris Edley
> To: John Podesta
> To: Benjamin Todd Jealous
> To: Chris Lu
> To: Cassandra Butts
> Cc: Jeanne Lambrew
> Cc: Alex Aleinikoff
> Cc: Mariano-Florentino Cuellar
> Cc: Darling-Hammond, Linda
> Sent: Oct 18, 2008 7:48 PM
> Subject: Leaks
>
> I've spoken or corresponded with a few people on my policy teams.  I
> recommend that we share no policy documents with the agency review teams --
> including the leads.  For the 20-page documents this week, I have grave
> reservations about electronic distribution to anyone other than members of
> the board and the most senior members of the staff. I see very little upside
> to broader distribution, and a great deal of risk, especially prior to
> 11/4.
>
>
> --
> (personal email)
> Christopher Edley, Jr.
>  Professor and Dean
> UC Berkeley Law School
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

(personal email)
Christopher Edley, Jr.
Professor and Dean
UC Berkeley Law School