Subject: Re: DRAFT: Henderson rally insert
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Speech Drafts <[email-masked]>, Emmy Ruiz <[email-masked]>, Tim Hogan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:54:37 -0600
List-Id: <speechdrafts.hillaryclinton.com>

Revising that explosives point like this:

   - If you’re too dangerous to fly, you’re too dangerous to buy a gun,
   period.  And you know what, not only can suspected terrorists on the no-fly
   list buy guns, they can also buy explosives. Can you believe that?

   - Let's hear the Republicans running for President explain why suspected
   terrorists should be able to buy explosives in America. And if they decide,
   well, maybe that's not so smart after all, then they should have to explain
   why it's ok for suspected terrorists to buy assault weapons like the ones
   used in San Bernardino, but not explosives. And if that sounds too risky,
   then why in Heaven's name should they be able to buy any gun at all?
   - All the Republican candidates love to talk tough, let's see if any of
   them has the backbone to say no to the NRA and end this insanity.

On Jan 5, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
wrote:

For Henderson rally tomorrow, am giving her the top-line closing argument
(she's pretty well got it by now) and a new bullet on how people on the
no-fly list can actually buy explosives as well as guns. Plus call to
action.

<2016-01-05 Henderson rally insert.docx>