Subject: For 8am
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Heather Stone <[email-masked]>, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, Jim <[email-masked]>, Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Kristina Schake <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, David Binder <[email-masked]>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, Oren Shur <[email-masked]>, Navin Nayak <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:53:41 -0500

I hope on our 8am we can discuss next steps for the "real people/fighting
for you" riff we gave HRC.  She asked us to come back with a different
approach so would welcome guidance.

Also, several of us discussed tonight leaning into the argument that
Bernie's revolution is really a recipe for gridlock.  Anzo's new Iowa poll
found that this was one of the more effective contrasts and also that
overwhelming majorities prefer "a president who can build on recent
successes and work to find common ground to get the results that are
possible" over "a president who promises to shake up Washington and tries
to make big sweeping changes."  We played around with a riff about how
people "can't wait for the revolution" to see progress on wages, on drug
prices, etc.  They need real results now.  Joel, Mandy, and Jake all seemed
to think this was worth exploring, so would be great to discuss with the
full group.

Thanks
Dan