Subject: UPDATE -- new outline
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, Jim <[email-masked]>, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Oren Shur <[email-masked]>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, David Binder <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:29:47 -0500

Circling back around with everyone for an update.  After further
discussions here this morning, folks came to two conclusions: First, that
we should back off the explicit revolution language because it will get us
into a fight we don't want; second, that we need to give her a full
argument and a new speech, not a brief insert.  We then sketched out the
attached outline.  I'm going to fill in some of the language with the goal
of getting her a more robust document later this afternoon (although still
an outline).  Could everyone take a look and weigh in now on the direction
and argument?  And I'll recirculate before sending to her in a couple hours?
Thanks very much.
Dan