Subject: Re: UPDATE -- new outline - 430pm
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, Jim <[email-masked]>, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Oren Shur <[email-masked]>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, David Binder <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:48:53 -0500

After getting feedback from WJC, Jake, Mandy, and Binder, I've filled this
out considerably.  Please take a final look before we send forward to
HRC/WJC.
Thanks
Dan

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> Circling back around with everyone for an update.  After further
> discussions here this morning, folks came to two conclusions: First, that
> we should back off the explicit revolution language because it will get us
> into a fight we don't want; second, that we need to give her a full
> argument and a new speech, not a brief insert.  We then sketched out the
> attached outline.  I'm going to fill in some of the language with the goal
> of getting her a more robust document later this afternoon (although still
> an outline).  Could everyone take a look and weigh in now on the direction
> and argument?  And I'll recirculate before sending to her in a couple hours?
> Thanks very much.
> Dan
>
>
>
>