Subject: Re: DRAFT: "We Can't Wait" Speech
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:56:02 -0500

That's always the trade-off with her.  I erred on the side of inclusion so
she wouldn't come back at me saying "What about paid leave?" or "Why isn't
community banking in here?"  But I think you're right and I'll thin it out.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:53 PM, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> I like a lot of this, but it has the feel of the kitchen sink being thrown
> in. Can we pare some of the less important stuff out or do you think she
> wants to see it all in? In the here's where we agree graph, I'd make Wall
> St last.
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>
>> Team, attached is a full draft of a speech based on the outline we gave
>> HRC yesterday.  At its core is the argument that Sanders' ideas will lead
>> to gridlock, not action, and Americans can't wait to see results.
>>
>> This is about 2800 words, which is roughly 25 minutes.  So cuts welcome.
>>
>> I need to get to HRC and WJC soon, so I apologize about the short-turn
>> around but would love reactions ASAP.
>> Thank you.
>> Dan
>>
>