Subject: Re: DRAFT: Remarks at Jewish Federation of Des Moines
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>
Cc: Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, Sarah Bard <[email-masked]>, Speech Drafts <[email-masked]>, Matt Paul <[email-masked]>, Lily Adams <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:54:22 -0500
List-Id: <speechdrafts.hillaryclinton.com>

That's the question on the table. Guidance from Podesta and group yesterday
was that we don't want her to be the attack dog in her remarks except for
core high level contrast. So that's why I'm asking if we should do the Iran
hit or not.

On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:49 PM, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]> wrote:

Also, shouldn't we be doing Iran troops in Syria-- weakening our coalition
and putting troops on Israel's doorstep?

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]> wrote:

We are doing so much on national security the graph on headwinds of global
economy seem obtuse. Can we get more in the lane of economic progress we
need close to home:  good paying jobs, raising incomes, minimum wage and
equal pay.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>
wrote:

Let's not say naive or uninformed.

On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Sarah Bard <[email-masked]> wrote:

Laura and team - Suggestion back was not name him specifically.  Reference
ideology, without using the exact language Bernie used, and making it very
clear what she's referencing.

 Something like, "those who suggest that we looks past human rights
violations, blatant disregard of international law and ... by the leading
state sponsor of terrorism, Iran, are dangerously naive or who largely
uninformed about how the world works."

Thank you
Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 23, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
wrote:

Let me know if we should add a Bernie hit on Iran in here. Right now its
pretty straight.
Thanks
Dan

<2016-01-23 Jewish Federation of Des Moines - 630pm.docx>