Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:27:20 +0000

I am working on language that could be used for either paper statement or
remarks on Friday, and will circulate tonight.

On 11/19/14, 5:03 PM, "Huma Abedin" <[email-masked]> wrote:

>Just ask john. 
>John, did you and hrc talk about EA this afternoon?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Nick Merrill [mailto:[email-masked]]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 04:53 PM Eastern Standard Time
>To: Huma Abedin; Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>;
>[email-masked]' <[email-masked]>
>Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
>Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>
>I see her in 37 minutes so it would be good to have a sense by then...
>
>On 11/19/14, 4:51 PM, "Huma Abedin" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>>I think she may have talked to him.
>>She's out of pocket for a bit now.
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Nick Merrill [mailto:[email-masked]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 04:47 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>To: Huma Abedin; Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>;
>>[email-masked]' <[email-masked]>
>>Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
>>Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>
>>Just heard back from the WH.  Jen Palmieri is going to call me to go over
>>stuff, and mentioned that John is supposed to be calling HRC this
>>afternoon to go through the plan, so it would be good if when he did we
>>were synced up with him on approach.
>>
>>From: Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
>>Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 4:38 PM
>>To: Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>, Jacob Sullivan
>><[email-masked]>, NSM <[email-masked]>
>>Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
>>Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>
>>
>>Hrc just called to check in on draft statement. Needless to say, she's
>>anxious to look at it. what do you think timewise you need to have
>>something realistically?
>> 
>>
>>From: Philippe Reines [mailto:[email-masked]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 03:57 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>To: Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>; NSM <[email-masked]>
>>Cc: Huma Abedin; DBS <[email-masked]>
>>Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>> 
>>
>>We need to start getting used to saying things on camera, might as well
>>start now. 
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>From: Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>
>>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:15:44 -0500
>>To: Nick Merrill<[email-masked]>
>>Cc: Huma Abedin<[email-masked]>; Dan
>>Schwerin<[email-masked]>; Philippe Reines<[email-masked]>
>>Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>
>>In my view, that's better than paper statement but would like Podesta and
>>PIR view.
>>
>>On Wednesday, November 19, 2014, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>
>>wrote:
>>> 92Y is not a great opportunity, no Qs and falls during the POTUS
>>>remarks.  Q&A is with Walter Isaacson on Friday evening, could easily do
>>>it there.
>>> From: Jacob Sullivan <[email-masked]>
>>> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 3:12 PM
>>> To: NSM <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, Dan Schwerin
>>><[email-masked]>, Philippe Reines <[email-masked]>
>>> Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>>
>>> What is context of 92Y appearance?  Does she have to answer qs?  Best
>>>would be for her to answer q Fri, supporting action and then calling for
>>>immediate negotiations on legislative path toward CIR.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, November 19, 2014, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>
>>>wrote:
>>>> She is currently a surprise at the 92nd Street Y, and no significant
>>>>press presence.
>>>> From: Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 1:46 PM
>>>> To: Jacob Sullivan <[email-masked]>, NSM
>>>><[email-masked]>
>>>> Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>, Philippe Reines
>>>><[email-masked]>
>>>> Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>>>
>>>> First they said fri, then said tomorrow night.
>>>> She is on stage at 92nd street Y at the same time as his speech.
>>>>  
>>>> From: Jake Sullivan [mailto:[email-masked]]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 01:12 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>>> To: Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>
>>>> Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>; Philippe Reines
>>>><[email-masked]>; Huma Abedin
>>>> Subject: Re: Executive Action | HRC
>>>>  
>>>> I thought this was fri?
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, November 19, 2014, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> Taking HRC off for a moment.  We are out giving a speech at St.
>>>>>Jude¹s
>>>>> tomorrow at about 1:15pm Eastern, so that¹s one option depending on
>>>>>the WH
>>>>> timing. We could also tweet and expand up it on Friday where she¹s
>>>>>out a
>>>>> couple of times, once talking about Cookstoves first thing in the
>>>>>morning
>>>>> and then doing a Q&A with Walter Isaacson at the NY Historical
>>>>>Society at
>>>>> night.  Or we could do a more formal statement, as HRC is suggesting.
>>>>> As
>>>>> you¹re all aware, we don¹t typically put out formal statements, so
>>>>>while
>>>>> that certainly doesn¹t preclude us from doing so here, it¹s just a
>>>>>matter
>>>>> of how light a touch we want to take, or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/19/14, 12:04 PM, "H" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I want to release it right after POTUS announces. Can you get info
>>>>>>from
>>>>>>WH that will help us?
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>