Subject: Re: Trade statement okay to go
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>
Cc: Marlon Marshall <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Jesse Ferguson <[email-masked]>, Josh Schwerin <[email-masked]>, Nick Merrill <[email-masked]>, Kristina Schake <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:06:21 -0400

Here's the final:

“Hillary Clinton believes that any new trade measure has to pass two tests:
First, it should put us in a position to protect American workers, raise
wages and create more good jobs at home. Second, it must also strengthen
our national security. We should be willing to walk away from any outcome
that falls short of these tests.  The goal is greater prosperity and
security for American families, not trade for trade’s sake. She will be
watching closely to see what is being done to crack down on currency
manipulation, improve labor rights, protect the environment and health,
promote transparency, and open new opportunities for our small businesses
to export overseas.  As she warned in her book, Hard Choices, we shouldn’t
be giving special rights to corporations at the expense of workers and
consumers."

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> We are good to share with labor and press.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>