Subject: Re: IDP Dinner
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:29:36 -0400

What if it's "just ask the folks in the sharing economy" instead?

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> I know input at this point is probably unwelcome,  but I don't like the
> uber reference used the way it is here.
> On Jul 17, 2015 3:39 PM, "Dan Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> >
> > So the candidate woke up this morning wanting to do this speech a little
> differently -- more personal and unique to her.  Here's where we've landed.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for late comments. Just two:
> >>
> >> We have a line the middle after mental health hit about not yelling at
> each other. Isn't that line out if wham given that we just spent the first
> half of speech whacking republicans
> >>
> >> Also, in Econ discussion:  should we include "strong growth, fair
> growth, long term growth"'so we start to brand it and own it?
> >> Don't think we need to elaborate but it does sum up her Econ
> philosophy, no?
> >>
> >> Joel
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Team, thanks for the good feedback on the Iowa speech. Latest draft is
> attached, which also reflects her suggestions.  Two notes: 1) apparently a
> time limit is being strictly enforced, so I've cut this down a bunch. 2)
> HRC felt strongly about not touching Planned Parenthood right now. Jen
> talked to her about it so perhaps could elaborate.
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Dan Schwerin <
> [email-masked]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's a first cut at HRC's remarks for the IDP dinner. Would love
> your thoughts. She is reviewing as well. A few notes:
> >>>>
> >>>> -- This opens by recalling previous collaborations with the other Dem
> candidates. To me, this is a chance to seem big and inclusive when they are
> likely to be trying to drive wedges.  Easy to cut, but might be a nice
> grace note.
> >>>> -- This draft throws out some red meat early on with Donald Trump to
> get the crowd jazzed at the top. Then she can do your affirmative agenda
> and circle back to the fuller contrast later on. Plenty of other ways to
> organize this, but a good hit at the top seemed important.
> >>>> -- Given the growing controversy over the leaked Planned Parenthood
> video, with Boehner calling for hearings and other GOPers piling on, we
> should think about whether this is a good time to join the battle and come
> to Planned Parenthood's defense, or whether it's wiser to stay away. For
> now, its in here.
> >>>> -- Finally, you'll see a hit on Governor Branstad for his veto of
> mental health funding.  Matt thinks this is a good fight to pick and I
> agree. Gives you a chance to make an emotional appeal on an issue you care
> about so much. The Governor is also riling folks up with his education
> cuts, so that's in here as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Am going to keep working this and punching up the language, but
> wanted to share early draft in case folks have initial reactions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> <2015-07-16 IDP dinner - 9pm.docx>
> >
> >
>
>