Subject: Uber
From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:13:23 -0400

John, I just want to be sure you saw this edit.  You ok with us replacing
uber with "folks in the sharing economy"?  Given the CEO of Uber's vocal
support for ACA, it seems like a nice way to stick it to Bush.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> What if it's "just ask the folks in the sharing economy" instead?
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, John Podesta <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>
>> I know input at this point is probably unwelcome,  but I don't like the
>> uber reference used the way it is here.
>> On Jul 17, 2015 3:39 PM, "Dan Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > So the candidate woke up this morning wanting to do this speech a
>> little differently -- more personal and unique to her.  Here's where we've
>> landed.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for late comments. Just two:
>> >>
>> >> We have a line the middle after mental health hit about not yelling at
>> each other. Isn't that line out if wham given that we just spent the first
>> half of speech whacking republicans
>> >>
>> >> Also, in Econ discussion:  should we include "strong growth, fair
>> growth, long term growth"'so we start to brand it and own it?
>> >> Don't think we need to elaborate but it does sum up her Econ
>> philosophy, no?
>> >>
>> >> Joel
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>
>> >> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Dan Schwerin <
>> [email-masked]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Team, thanks for the good feedback on the Iowa speech. Latest draft
>> is attached, which also reflects her suggestions.  Two notes: 1) apparently
>> a time limit is being strictly enforced, so I've cut this down a bunch. 2)
>> HRC felt strongly about not touching Planned Parenthood right now. Jen
>> talked to her about it so perhaps could elaborate.
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Dan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Dan Schwerin <
>> [email-masked]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Here's a first cut at HRC's remarks for the IDP dinner. Would love
>> your thoughts. She is reviewing as well. A few notes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- This opens by recalling previous collaborations with the other
>> Dem candidates. To me, this is a chance to seem big and inclusive when they
>> are likely to be trying to drive wedges.  Easy to cut, but might be a nice
>> grace note.
>> >>>> -- This draft throws out some red meat early on with Donald Trump to
>> get the crowd jazzed at the top. Then she can do your affirmative agenda
>> and circle back to the fuller contrast later on. Plenty of other ways to
>> organize this, but a good hit at the top seemed important.
>> >>>> -- Given the growing controversy over the leaked Planned Parenthood
>> video, with Boehner calling for hearings and other GOPers piling on, we
>> should think about whether this is a good time to join the battle and come
>> to Planned Parenthood's defense, or whether it's wiser to stay away. For
>> now, its in here.
>> >>>> -- Finally, you'll see a hit on Governor Branstad for his veto of
>> mental health funding.  Matt thinks this is a good fight to pick and I
>> agree. Gives you a chance to make an emotional appeal on an issue you care
>> about so much. The Governor is also riling folks up with his education
>> cuts, so that's in here as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Am going to keep working this and punching up the language, but
>> wanted to share early draft in case folks have initial reactions.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks
>> >>>> Dan
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> <2015-07-16 IDP dinner - 9pm.docx>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>