Subject: RE: UPDATE -- new outline - 430pm
From: David Binder <[email-masked]>
To: John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>, Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, Jim Margolis <[email-masked]>, Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Oren Shur <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:57:41 -0800

I think it's great too.

From: John Anzalone [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:55 PM
To: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]>; Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>; Jim Margolis <[email-masked]>; Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>; John Podesta <[email-masked]>; Huma Abedin <[email-masked]>; Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>; Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]>; Robby Mook <[email-masked]>; Oren Shur <[email-masked]>; David Binder <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: UPDATE -- new outline - 430pm

I like the urgency of this.  People need help now.  She can shit done.

John Anzalone
Partner
Anzalone Liszt Grove Research
(o) 334.387.3121
Website<http://algpolling.com/>| Twitter<http://twitter.com/anzaloneliszt>| LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-anzalone/5/aa2/563>| Facebook<http://facebook.com/anzaloneresearch>

From: Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 3:48 PM
To: Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Jim Margolis <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Joel Beneneson <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, John Podesta <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Huma Abedin <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Jake Sullivan <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Oren Shur <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, David Binder <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: UPDATE -- new outline - 430pm

After getting feedback from WJC, Jake, Mandy, and Binder, I've filled this out considerably.  Please take a final look before we send forward to HRC/WJC.
Thanks
Dan

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Circling back around with everyone for an update.  After further discussions here this morning, folks came to two conclusions: First, that we should back off the explicit revolution language because it will get us into a fight we don't want; second, that we need to give her a full argument and a new speech, not a brief insert.  We then sketched out the attached outline.  I'm going to fill in some of the language with the goal of getting her a more robust document later this afternoon (although still an outline).  Could everyone take a look and weigh in now on the direction and argument?  And I'll recirculate before sending to her in a couple hours?
Thanks very much.
Dan