Subject: RE: Sanders ad - new chain
From: David Binder <[email-masked]>
To: Oren Shur <[email-masked]>, Rich Davis <[email-masked]>, "Margolis, Jim" <[email-masked]>
Cc: Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>, John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>, John Anzalone <[email-masked]>, David Dixon <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Christina Reynolds <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>, Navin Nayak <[email-masked]>, Jon Fromowitz <[email-masked]>, Matt Paul <[email-masked]>, Michael Halle <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:02:05 -0800

I agree Oren, and agree with Mandy, this ad will not be viewed as an attack ad in the slightest.

From: Oren Shur [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 2:01 PM
To: Rich Davis <[email-masked]>; Margolis, Jim <[email-masked]>
Cc: Joel Benenson <[email-masked]>; John Podesta <[email-masked]>; Mandy Grunwald <[email-masked]>; John Anzalone <[email-masked]>; David Binder <[email-masked]>; David Dixon <[email-masked]>; Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>; Christina Reynolds <[email-masked]>; Robby Mook <[email-masked]>; Navin Nayak <[email-masked]>; Jon Fromowitz <[email-masked]>; Matt Paul <[email-masked]>; Michael Halle <[email-masked]>
Subject: Sanders ad - new chain

Bringing discussion back to this chain. + Matt/Mike.

I don’t think this ad warrants an on-air response from us.  And we’d probably look silly if we did it.  Not a great spot.

Anyone disagree?